Currencies

Highlights Biden’s chances of winning the US election are rising, but it is still unsettled and could bring negative surprises to financial markets. The fiscal cliff will not subside immediately as the Senate Republicans have been vindicated for their fiscally hawkish approach. We doubt Democrats will win both Senate seats in Georgia to restore the lost “Democratic Sweep” scenario that offered maximum policy reflation. President Trump’s lame duck period, if he loses, lasts for three months and could bring negative surprises on China, the Taiwan Strait, Big Tech, Iran, or North Korea. The US remains at “peak polarization,” though we expect a growing national consensus over the long haul. Go long a basket of Trans-Pacific Partnership countries on a strategic time horizon to capitalize on what we believe will be Biden’s pro-trade-ex-China policy. Feature Chart 1Market Response To US Election The US presidential election remains undecided despite former Vice President Joe Biden’s increasing likelihood of victory. Votes will be recounted in several states while one potential tipping-point state, Pennsylvania, could easily swing on a Supreme Court decision. The Senate is likely to remain in Republican hands, though there is still a ~20% chance that it will flip if Democrats win both of the likely Georgia runoff elections on January 5. Thus our base case is the same as in our final forecast: Biden plus a Republican Senate. Financial markets first rallied and have now paused (Chart 1). The pause makes sense to us. Ultimately the best-case scenario of this election was always Biden plus a Republican Senate – neither tariffs nor taxes would increase. But this same scenario also always posed the highest risk of near-term fiscal tightening that would undermine the US recovery and global reflation trade. GOP Senators will insist on a smaller fiscal relief bill and may wait too long to enact it. Below we discuss these dynamics and why we maintain a tactically defensive position amid this contested election. We will not go full risk-on until the critical short-run risks subside: the contested election, the fiscal impasse, Trump’s “lame duck” executive orders, and the international response. Biden Not Yet President-Elect Biden is leading the vote tally in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin as we go to press. To all appearances he has reclaimed the “Blue Wall” (MI, PA, WI) and made inroads in the Sun Belt (AZ, GA). We will not go full risk-on until the critical short-run risks subside. Map 1 shows tentative election results. Unsettled states are colored lightly while settled states are solid red or blue. This map points to a Biden victory even if Georgia and Pennsylvania slip back to Trump. The President would need to reclaim the latter two and one other state to reach 270 Electoral College votes. Map 1US 2020 Election Results (Tentative) Chart 2 shows the final prediction of our quantitative model. While our model predicted a Trump victory at 51% odds, we subjectively capped Trump’s odds at 45% because we disagreed that Trump would win Michigan.1 We did not do the same for our Senate model as the results matched with our subjective judgment that Republicans would keep control. Chart 2Our Presidential Quant Model Versus Actual Results Investors cannot yet conclude that the contested election risks have abated. If Biden wins only AZ, NV, MI, and WI, then he will end up with 270 Electoral College votes. This is the minimal vote needed for a victory. It is legitimate, but it means that a net of one faithless elector, or a disqualified elector, could throw the nation into a historic and nearly unprecedented crisis. If the Electoral College becomes indecisive for any reason, the House of Representatives will decide the election. Each state will get one vote. The results of the election suggest Republicans have four-to-ten seat majority of state delegations in the House (Table 1). Trump would win. Polarization and unrest would explode. Not for nothing did we brand this election cycle “Civil War Lite.” Table 1State Delegations In US House Of Representatives The greater the margin of victory in the Electoral College, the less vulnerable the nation is to indecision in the college, or to a result decided in the courts. The Republicans have a strong case in Pennsylvania that votes that arrived after November 3 should not be counted. It is not clear if the Supreme Court will revisit the case, having left it unresolved prior to the election. If Pennsylvania’s 20 electoral votes become the fulcrum of the election, and the Supreme Court rules to exclude votes received after November 3, and if Trump thereby wins the count, a national crisis will erupt. This is not high probability at the moment because Biden can afford to lose Pennsylvania if he wins Nevada or Georgia. But the history of contested elections teaches that investors should not rush to conclusions. Senate Gridlock Will Survive Georgia Runoffs The most likely balance of power is a Democratic president with a Republican Senate and Democratic House, i.e. gridlock. Chart 3 shows the likely balance of power in Congress. Democrats would need to win both runoff elections in Georgia to win 50 seats, which would give them a de facto majority if Biden wins, since Vice President Kamala Harris would become President of the Senate and break any tie votes there. They are unlikely to do so. Chart 3AGridlock In US Government Chart 3BGridlock In US Government Why do we doubt that Democrats will win both Georgia seats, given that Trump is now falling short in the statewide presidential vote? First, Republicans tend to do well in runoffs as Georgia is a conservative-leaning state (Chart 4). Second, the Republican vote was greater than the Democratic vote in both Senate elections, though falling short of 50%. Third, exit polls show that voters leaned Republican in the suburbs and were mostly concerned about the economy, not the coronavirus. Fourth, also clear from exit polls, Republican voters will be more motivated to retain control of the Senate with Trump out, while Democratic voters will be less motivated with Biden in (Chart 5). Voter turnout will drop in the special election as usual. Neither Trump nor the presidency will be on the ballot on January 5. Still, it is possible for Democrats to win both seats and hence de facto control of the Senate. We would say the odds are roughly 20% (0.5 x 0.4 = 0.2). Chart 4GOP Does Well In Georgia Runoffs Chart 5Georgia 2020 Election Results (So Far) If Democrats pulled off two victories in Georgia, the “Blue Sweep” scenario would be reaffirmed and several legislative proposals that had a 0% chance of passage in a Republican Senate would become at least possible. Certainly taxes would go up – the Democrats would be able to use the reconciliation process to push through reforms to the health care system paid for by partially repealing the Trump Tax Cut and Jobs Act. They would also be able to pass legislation that is popular with moderate Democrats who would then hold the balance in the Senate. The Green New Deal would become possible, if highly improbable. There would be a small chance of removing the filibuster in an exigency, but a vanishingly small chance of other radical structural changes, like creating new seats on the Supreme Court or granting statehood to Washington DC and Puerto Rico. A 50-50 count in the Senate, with Harris breaking the tie, would produce a larger increase in the budget deficit than otherwise. Stocks would have to discount the tax hike but they would recover quickly on the prospect of combined monetary and fiscal ultra-dovishness. Fiscal Impasse Prolonged Biden plus a Republican Senate is positive for the US corporate earnings outlook over the 24 months between now and the 2022 midterm election. It is also positive for the global earnings outlook over the four-year period due to the drastically reduced odds of a global trade war. But it is negative in the near term because it will result in a smaller and delayed fiscal relief package – and sooner than later the market will need a signal that the government will not pull the rug out from under the recovery. Biden plus a GOP Senate is negative in the near term due to fiscal risks but positive beyond that. True, the US economy continues to bounce back rapidly, which is why the Republicans performed so well in this election despite a recession, a pandemic, and a failure to pass another round of stimulus beforehand. In October the unemployment rate fell to 6.9%. Yet previous rounds of fiscal support are drying up. The job market is showing some signs of underlying weakness and these will worsen as long as benefits run out and COVID-19 cases discourage economic activity (Chart 6). Personal income has dropped off from its peak when the first round of stimulus was passed in March. Without the dole it will relapse (Chart 7). Chart 6US Job Market Weakening Sans Stimulus Chart 7US Personal Income Will Drop Sans Stimulus Will Senate Republicans agree to a fiscal deal in the “lame duck” session before the new Congress sits on January 3? We have no basis for a high-conviction view. They might agree to a deal in the range of $500 billion to $1 trillion, but only if the Democrats come down to these levels in the talks. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is one of the big winners of the election. He held his seat and likely maintained Republican control of the Senate without capitulating to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s demands of a $3 trillion-plus relief bill. He wagered that Republicans would do better with voters if they concentrated on reopening the economy (and confirming Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court) while limiting any fiscal bill to targeted COVID response measures. He drew a hawkish line against broad-based social spending and bailouts for state and local governments. The gambit appears to have worked. House Democrats, far from gaining seats, lost five. We would not be surprised if Pelosi were replaced as speaker in 2021. Her plan backfired so badly that if Trump had stayed on message in his campaign, he might even have won. The implication is that unless Pelosi comes down to McConnell’s number, the fiscal impasse will extend into January and February. The American public approves of fiscal relief, but that did not force McConnell’s hand earlier, as the economy was recovering regardless (Table 2). Unless the economy slumps or financial markets selloff drastically, he will likely insist on a skinny deal that includes liability protections for businesses while minimizing bailouts for indebted blue states. Table 2Americans Support Fiscal Stimulus Package Hence investors are likely to get bad news before good news on the US fiscal front. And if other bad news arises, the absence of fiscal support will be sorely felt. This motivates our tactically defensive posture until the fiscal impasse is resolved. Peak Polarization Polarization is at peak levels in the US and the election result suggests it will remain elevated. Whichever party wins will win with a narrow margin. There is simply no commanding mandate for either party, as has been the case this century, so the struggle will continue (Chart 8). Chart 8Polarization Will Continue With Narrow Margins Of Victory Of course, polarization may subside temporarily, assuming Trump loses. At least under Biden the Electoral College vote will coincide with the popular vote, improving popular consent. Biden will have a lower disapproval rating, probably throughout his term. High disapproval tends to coincide with crises in modern US history, but in 2021, after the dust clears from this election, the country may catch its breath (Chart 9). Chart 9Presidential Disapproval Will Fall Much will depend on whether the presumed Biden administration is willing to sideline the left-wing of the Democratic Party to court the median voter. Exit polling in the swing states strongly suggests that the Biden administration won the election (if indeed it did) by improving Democratic support among the majority white population, non-college educated voters, and senior citizens, all groups that delivered Trump the victory in 2016. The Democrats had mixed results among ethnic minorities and suburban voters. Their biggest liability was their focus on issues other than the economy (Chart 10). Chart 10Exit Polls Say Focus On Bread And Butter Over the coming decade we think the combination of (1) cold war with China and (2) generational change on fiscal policy will produce a new national consensus. But we are not there yet. The contested election is not guaranteed to end amicably. If Trump wins on a technicality, the country will erupt into mass protests; if he loses and keeps crying stolen election, isolated domestic terrorist incidents are entirely possible. Moreover the battle over the 2020 census and redistricting process will be fierce. Democrats will be hungry to take the Senate in 2022, failing Georgia in January, to achieve major legislative objectives while Biden is in office. And the 2024 election will be vulnerable to the fact that Biden may have to bow out due to old age, depriving the Democrats of an incumbent advantage. The bottom line is that Republicans outperformed and will not be inclined to help the Biden administration start off on strong footing. The implication is the fiscal battle will extend into the New Year unless a stock market selloff forces Republicans to compromise. Fiscal cliffs will be a recurring theme until at least the 2022 election. A deflationary tail risk will persist. Obama’s Legacy Secured? The sole significance of a gridlocked Biden presidency will lie in regulatory affairs, foreign policy, and trade policy. These are the policy areas where presidents have unilateral authority and Biden can act without the Senate’s approval. In this context, Biden’s sole focus will be to consolidate the legacy of the Barack Obama administration, in which he served. 1. Obamacare (ACA): Republicans failed to repeal and replace this bill despite a red sweep in 2016. Biden’s election ensures that Obamacare will be implemented, if not expanded, as he will have the power to enforce the law at the executive level. The risk is that the conservative-leaning Supreme Court could strike it down. Based on past experience, the health care sector will benefit from the drop in uncertainty once the court’s decision is known (Chart 11). For investors the lesson of the past four election cycles is that Obamacare is here to stay, but Americans will not adopt a single-payer system until 2025 at the earliest conceivable date. We are long health equipment and see this outcome as beneficial to the health sector in general, particularly health insurance companies. Big Pharma, however, will suffer from bipartisan populist pressures to cap prices. 2. Iran Nuclear Deal (JCPA): Biden will seek to restore Obama’s signature foreign policy accomplishment, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, i.e. the Iran nuclear deal of 2015. The purpose of the deal was to establish a modus vivendi in the Middle East so that the US could “pivot to Asia” and focus its energy on the existential strategic challenge posed by China. Biden will stick with this plan. The Iranians also want to restore the deal but will play hard to get at first. Israel and Saudi Arabia could act to thwart Iran and tie Biden’s hands in the final three months of Trump’s presidency while they have unmitigated American backing. Chart 11Obamacare Preserved The implication is that Iranian oil production will return to oil markets (Chart 12), but that conflict could cause production outages, and Saudi Arabia could increase production to seize market share. Hence price volatility is the outcome, which makes sense amid fiscal risks and COVID risks to demand as well. 3. The Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP): Biden claims he will “renegotiate” the Trans-Pacific Partnership, which was the Obama administration’s key trade initiative. The idea was to group like-minded Pacific Rim countries into an advanced trade deal that addressed services, the digital economy, labor and environmental standards, and pointedly excluded China. Trump withdrew from the deal out of pique despite the fact that it served the purpose of diversifying the American supply chain away from China. The impact of rejoining is miniscule from an economic point of view (Chart 13), but it will be a boon for small emerging markets like Mexico, Chile, Vietnam, and Malaysia. Chart 12Restoring The Iran Nuclear Deal Chart 13Rejoining The Trans-Pacific Partnership The bigger takeaway is that Biden will continue the US grand strategic shift toward confronting China, which will be a headwind toward Chinese manufacturing and a tailwind for India, Latin America, Southeast Asia. The US will cultivate relations with the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) as a more coherent economic bloc and a manufacturing counterweight to China (Chart 14). A lame duck Trump will  attempt to cement his legacy by targeting China/Taiwan, Iran, North Korea, or Big Tech. When it comes to on-shoring, Biden’s focus will be reducing dependency on China and improving the US’s supply security in sensitive areas like health and defense. Trade and strategic tensions with China will persist, but a global trade war is not in the cards. Manufacturing economies ex-China stand to benefit. 4. The Paris Climate Accord: Biden will not be able to pass his own version of the Green New Deal without the Senate, so investor excitement over a government-backed surge in green investment will subside for the time being (Chart 15). He will also moderate his stance on the energy sector after his pledge to phase out oil and gas nearly cost him the election. He was never likely to ban fracking comprehensively anyway. Chart 14ASEAN's Moment Biden will be able to rejoin the international Paris Agreement and reverse President Trump’s deregulation of the energy sector. He will re-regulate the economy to lift clean air, water, environment, and sustainability standards. This is a headwind for the energy sector, but stocks are already heavily discounted and congressional gridlock is a positive surprise. Chart 15Returning To The Paris Climate Accord There may be some room for compromise with Senate Republicans when it comes to renewables in a likely infrastructure package next year. Post-Trump Republicans may also be interested in Biden’s idea of a “carbon adjustment fee” on imports, which is another way of saying tariffs on Chinese-made goods. Like the health care sector, the election is tentatively positive for US energy stocks – especially once fiscal risks are surmounted. Investment Takeaways Chart 16Lame Duck Trump Risk: Taiwan Strait Three near-term risks prevent us from taking a tactically risk-on investment stance. First, the contested election, which could still throw up surprises. Second, the fiscal stimulus impasse, which could persist into January or February and will reduce the market’s margin of safety in the event of other negative surprises. Third, a lame duck Trump will attempt to cement his legacy via executive orders. He could target China/Taiwan, Iran, North Korea, or even Big Tech. On China, Trump is already tightening export controls on China and selling a large arms package to Taiwan (Chart 16). The lame duck period of any presidency is a useful time for the US to advance strategic objectives. Trump will also blame China and the coronavirus for his defeat. He could seek reparations for the virus, restrictions on Chinese manufacturing and immigration to the US, export controls or sanctions on tech companies, secondary sanctions over Iran or North Korea, delisting of Chinese companies listed in the US, sanctions over human rights violations in China’s autonomous regions, or travel bans on Communist Party members. During these three months, Big Tech will face crosswinds – risks from Trump, but opportunities from gridlock. Polarization has helped support US equity and tech outperformance over the past decade. Frequent hold-ups over the budget in Congress weigh on growth and inflation expectations, thus favoring growth stocks and tech. Internal divisions have prompted the US to lash out abroad, increasing risks to international stocks and driving safe-haven demand into the dollar and tech. More broadly the second wave of the pandemic is a boon for tech earnings and Biden will restore the Obama administration’s alliance with Silicon Valley. But tech is already priced for perfection and this favorable trend will be cut short when COVID restrictions ease and Biden works out a compromise with the Senate GOP over stimulus and the budget (Chart 17). Beyond these near-term risks, we have a constructive outlook for risk assets over the next 12 months. Chart 17Biden, Peak Polarization, And Big Tech Chart 18Global Stocks, Cyclicals Benefit When US Fiscal Impasse Resolved Insofar as Biden seeks to restore US commitment to global free trade, and more stable and cooperative relations with allies and partners ex-China, global policy uncertainty should fall relative to the United States. Once near-term fiscal hurdles are cleared, the dollar’s strength can subside and global stocks and global cyclicals can start to outperform (Chart 18). Chart 19Trump An Exclusively Commercial President We also favor stocks over bonds on a strategic horizon. Trump was an exclusively commercial president whose approval rating had a tight correlation with the stock-to-bond ratio (Chart 19). A surge in stocks would help power Trump’s approval. This relationship is not standard across presidents. But it does make sense during periods of policy change that affect earnings. Trump’s tax cuts are the best example. Equities outpaced bonds in anticipation of tax cuts in 2017. Trump’s approval rating recovered once the bill was passed. President Obama’s approval rating also correlated somewhat with the stock-to-bond ratio during the critical fiscal cliff negotiations under gridlock from 2010-12. Once Biden works out a compromise with GOP Senators, bond yields will rise and stocks will power upward. The takeaway from these points is that volatility can remain elevated over the next 0-3 months (Chart 20). We would not expect it to go as high as in 2000, when the dotcom bubble burst, but Trump’s lame duck maneuvers against China could generate a massive selloff. But this cannot be ruled out. Indeed, Trump’s constraints have almost entirely fallen away regardless of whether he loses or wins. Investors should take a phased and conservative approach to adding risk in the near term. The outlook will brighten up when the president is known, a fiscal deal is reached, and President Trump’s legacy as the Man Who Confronted China is complete. Chart 20Volatility Will Stay Elevated In Short Run Chart 21Go Long Trans-Pacific Partnership Given our view that Biden will be hawkish on China, especially amid gridlock at home, we are maintaining our short CNY-USD trade. We also recommend buying a basket of Trans-Pacific Partnership bourses, weighted by global stock market capitalization, on a strategic time-frame to capture what we expect will be Biden’s pro-trade-ex-China policy (Chart 21). Finally, to capture the views expressed above regarding Biden’s likely market impacts, over the short and long run, we will go long US health care relative to the broad market on a tactical basis and long US energy on a strategic basis.   Matt Gertken Vice President Geopolitical Strategy mattg@bcaresearch.com   Footnotes 1 As things stand, the model overrated the Republicans in Arizona and Georgia as well, though really Georgia looks to be the only state Democrats won that the model gave high odds of staying Republican. If we had used the level rather than the range of Trump’s approval rating – or if we had neglected opinion polling altogether – the model would have called a Biden win.

Highlights We agree with the market consensus that the long-term dollar outlook is bearish, but caution against chasing the dollar lower in the short term. While the election results remain uncertain, currency markets also continue to ignore risks of a no-deal Brexit and significant escalation in Covid-19 infections. As such, pro-cyclical currencies remain vulnerable to a countertrend reversal, especially as the greenback remains oversold. The Japanese yen stands as a viable portfolio hedge. For longer-term currency investors, a more robust portfolio of US and Chinese paper and precious metals should do better than a pro-cyclical basket. The Bank of England delivered significant stimulus this week. As we argue below, EUR/GBP remains a sell, but we will wait to buy sterling at 1.25. Look to rebuy a basket of Scandinavian currencies versus the USD and EUR at a trailing trigger point of -2%. New trade idea: Go long EUR/CHF. Feature The US election outcome has taken many investors by surprise. Going into election night, former Vice President Joe Biden was widely expected to win in a “blue wave.” This implied that the former Vice President wins the White House while Democrats gain control of the Senate and retain the House. This was not the BCA view. What has become evident is that similar to 2016, the polls have been offside. What we now know is that Republicans will likely keep control of the Senate. In short, the real prospect of a contested election and/or political gridlock in Washington is coming to fruition. President Donald Trump has been telegraphing that he views the results as fraudulent, triggered by some news agencies calling Arizona a Democratic win on Wednesday before all votes were counted. Some legal action is now becoming a real possibility, with Trump threatening to take matters to the Supreme Court and already filing lawsuits contesting the results in Michigan, Georgia and Pennsylvania. Democratic legal teams are surely preparing for retaliation. Cleaner risk-on/risk-off currency measures such as the AUD/JPY exchange rate were tracking 10-year Treasury yields tick-for-tick. The dollar price action has been consistent with our forecast of additional volatility, with wild swings in both the AUD/JPY exchange rate and the Chinese RMB. However, the direction of the DXY has been surprising, simply on the basis that the dollar is seasonally strong in November and, since the Great Financial crisis, the dollar has tended to rally into year-end (Chart I-1). In fact, given the political “certainty” going into elections, one would have expected the dollar to soar on Wednesday on a safe-haven bid. Chart I-1The Dollar Move This Week Was Unusual Chart I-2The Market Made A Shift Cleaner risk-on/risk-off currency measures such as the AUD/JPY exchange rate were tracking 10-year Treasury yields tick-for-tick, consistent with a safe-haven bid, as the election was becoming uncertain. Once it became clear that fiscal gridlock would be a reality, the market focus shifted from fiscal policy to the prospect that the Federal Reserve is likely to deliver additional stimulus (Chart I-2). US real rates have fallen relative to its trading partners. This is also consistent with the surge in technology equities and positive market action.  In a recent piece, we also argued that historically, the dollar has not really benefitted from uncertainty when the US is the source of political risk (Chart I-3). We had been, however, cautioning investors against other tail risks that we expect to continue to dominate the FX market narrative: Brexit and the new wave of Covid-19 infections.1  As such, even as the US election uncertainty gets resolved, markets remain vulnerable, and the dollar could still benefit from safe-haven flows. As we have argued, it will be a countertrend bounce rather than a renewed bull market. Chart I-3US Policy Uncertainty And The Dollar An Election “Post-Mortem” It is impossible to tell for sure when we will know the definitive election results, as the political theater is likely to continue in the coming days. What is clear is that the polls were widely offside in this election (Chart I-4). Chart I-4The Polls Were Offside Nevada will continue to accept ballots until November 10 and North Carolina until November 12 if they are postmarked by election day. A decision will have to be made in Pennsylvania, where Trump is still ahead in the polls, if ballots received after November 3 will be valid. As our geopolitical strategists argue,2 it would not be surprising if the Supreme Court ruled that ballots received after election day cannot be accepted, as the original deadline was changed to November 6 by a lower court decision. The two likely outcomes as we go to press are a GOP Senate and Democratic House, with either Biden or Trump in the White House. Betting markets are pricing in the former outcome. Our contention is that both are neutral-to-dollar bullish. Chart I-5The Dollar And Real Yields Democratic leaders have been more aggressive in their demands for a greater government role in the economy. What is clear is that Senate Republicans will block very aggressive stimulus, but will still agree to some spending. However, smaller stimulus may be offset by policies favorable for markets, such as lower taxes3 and lower regulation, remaining in place. This is a bullish outcome for the dollar since on the one hand, US equities continue to enjoy a higher rate of return, and on the other hand, real bond yields are likely to be higher with less-than-expected fiscal stimulus.  Should Trump win the White House, the biggest risk down the road is a renewed trade war, not only with China but even with Europe. This was evident in RMB overnight trading, as Trump started to positively surprise in the polls with Florida. Economically, a trade war will lift the price of foreign goods and services. Foreign currencies should depreciate, as demand for their goods adjusts lower to a higher tariff. This will boost the dollar. That said, it is possible that market focus has rapidly shifted from the government to the Fed. For one, foreign policy is unlikely to be the focus in the near term, given the immediate need for fiscal stimulus and a pandemic. Meanwhile, US real rates have been falling relative to its trading partners this week (Chart I-5). Ten-year TIPS yields have also declined relative to similar real rates in Germany or the UK. In short, the bond market may be pricing in that the Fed will offset any decline in inflation expectations by more stimulus later. For now, they remain on hold. The Real Risk To Dollar Short Positions What is becoming clear to market participants is that the US Treasury market continues to maintain its safe-haven properties. This was evident both in the March drawdown and in recent trading sessions. So, the big risk to dollar short positions is economic uncertainty that drives inflows into the US dollar. Chart I-6Japan Has Been Buying Treasurys Chart I-7Capital Outflows From Japan Chart I-6 shows that Japanese investors and officials have remained very active buyers of US Treasurys, despite real rates being higher in Japan. This partly explains why the yen has not been a particularly potent safe haven compared to the dollar this year. In a nutshell, the huge pool of Japanese external assets has not been repatriated home during times of market stress. Japan is the biggest holder of US Treasurys in the world, and looking at portfolio investment, it remains deeply negative in 2020. In short, income receipts have been rapidly re-invested abroad (Chart I-7). Japanese investors and officials have remained very active buyers of US Treasurys, despite real rates being higher in Japan. Overall, the Japanese yen still remains a safe-haven asset. The yen did outperform from the September drawdown in markets, and has proven to be a better hedge than the Swiss franc or the US dollar over the longer term (Chart I-8). Chart I-8The Yen Remains The Perfect Hedge Chart I-9An Explosion In Covid-19 Cases The need for a portfolio hedge is particularly important, since the US presidential elections are not the only source of uncertainty. As we approach the winter season in the northern hemisphere, a new wave of infections is taking hold. Norway and Switzerland, small countries that were able to manage infection rates over the summer, are seeing a resurgence in cases. Even Sweden, where infection rates had dropped significantly, is going through a very severe second wave (Chart I-9). In the case of Sweden, this is seriously questioning the theory of “herd immunity,” since the economy never really shut down. The key variable for the dollar will be global and relative growth. For much of the summer months, the US was under siege from a second wave while the Eurozone and many other countries were well into their reopening phases. Now the reverse is happening, where the reacceleration in cases is somewhat faster outside the US, triggering temporary lockdowns. If this threatens the improvement in relative economic growth between G10 economies and the US, this could catalyze a dollar rally (Chart I-10). Chart I-10The Dollar And Relative Growth Our longer-term bias remains that the potential economic impact from Covid-19 is likely to be much less than what many economies endured for the first half of 2020. The virus is less deadly, as mortality rates across many countries have come down, and there is a potential for a vaccine soon. As global economies recover, the dollar will decline, with portfolio rotation into cheaper markets. That may be the story for 2021. As we argued last week, the market remains due for a reset in the short term, which should benefit the dollar. The BoE, Brexit And The Case For The Pound As both the pandemic and US election risks remain at the fore of investors’ concerns, Brexit uncertainty continues to brew in the background. UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson has been forced to relock the economy as the number of new cases surge. At the same time, negotiations between the EU and the UK continue in their stop-and-go pattern. Both sides failed to reach an agreement this week, and talks should resume on Sunday or Monday. More importantly, key issues such as the treatment of Northern Ireland remain unresolved, with political bickering over other concerns such as fishing access rights, “level playing field” conditions for businesses and energy cooperation. The Bank of England decided today to front-run the impending economic slowdown by aggressively increasing its target for government bond purchases by £150 billion to £875 billion. This was bigger than expected. The target for corporate bond purchases stays at £20 billion. This will balloon the BoE’s balance sheet to over 40% of GDP. This will be at par with the Fed, but still lower than the European Central Bank or the Bank of Japan. With lower estimates for Q3 GDP growth and a double-dip recession baked in the cake for Q4, additional stimulus was warranted. The BoE also expects UK GDP to only return to pre-pandemic levels in 2022, rather than 2021. The reaction in the gilt market was muted, with rates back to yesterday’s levels, and the pound was slightly up on broad-based dollar weakness. Such action is warranted, given the already very low levels of UK interest rates, especially relative to the US. And with the Fed effectively signaling unlimited quantitative easing, the efficacy of other central bank actions on relative monetary policy trends has dramatically fallen. We saw the same reaction from the Aussie dollar earlier this week, even though the Reserve Bank of Australia cut interest rates and expanded its QE program. The UK budget deficit has tended to move in lockstep with central bank purchases.  Domestically, the shift by the BoE was important. The UK budget deficit has tended to move in lockstep with central bank purchases (Chart I-11). When domestic demand is low, the right policy is for government to step in and prevent a negative feedback loop of falling prices, rising real rates and higher savings. We, therefore, commend the Chancellor of the Exchequer, Rishi Sunak's, push to extend the furlough scheme and relief to businesses until the end of next March. This should cushion the blow from the lockdown on the economy. The important takeaway is that the BoE’s QE program opens the door for more fiscal stimulus, since the government can issue debt that will be purchased by the central bank. And given the UK borrows in its own currency, this is not a threat to the pound, especially given extremely low financing costs (Chart I-12) and the lack of inflationary pressures in the UK. In fact, this is a key distinction from the prior warfare episodes, where soaring deficits were met with higher inflation that pushed up interest rates and triggered massive devaluations in the currency. Today, the problem is deficient rather than excess demand. Chart I-11UK Debt And Central Bank QE Chart I-12Cheap Debt Financing Costs The key risk for the pound, therefore, remains a “no-deal” Brexit. This possibility is probably higher with a Trump presidency, since former Vice President Joe Biden has opposed Brexit. This limits the potential for a favorable trade deal with the US, should Democrats gain control of the White House. On the positive side, we have noted before that the pound is in an “ugly contest” with all fiat currencies. For example, even though speculators are short the pound today, positioning is much less extreme than in 2016 or 2019, when the Brexit referendum and the election of Prime Minister Johnson led to “maximum pessimism” on cable. Moreover, the pound is cheap. The cheapness of a currency can be measured by the trade balance, since a cheap currency will stimulate exports while imports will be relatively expensive. On this metric, the UK trade balance has violently swung to near balance (Chart I-13).  Chart I-13The UK Trade Balance Is Improving As a strategy, we are short EUR/GBP for now as a play on cable strength. Interest rates still favor the UK relative to Germany or France, and the dollar could receive a bid over the next one-to-three months, as we have argued above. We also have a limit-buy on GBP/USD at 1.25. In terms of targets, cable will be between 1.35-1.40 over the next six months. In an optimistic scenario, the pound could go 20-25% higher. Concluding Thoughts We continue to advocate for a prudent strategy when trading foreign exchange markets over the next few weeks: Hold some portfolio protection. Our preferred vehicle is the Japanese yen, as argued above. Longer-term, as the dollar declines, the Chinese yuan will benefit. The Chinese bond market could be becoming the safe-haven in Asia. A basket of Chinese bonds and silver has provided less volatility than procyclical currencies (Chart I-14). Focus on trades at the crosses. An interesting divergence has opened between EUR/CHF and EUR/USD. Either the euro is too high or the franc is too high (Chart I-15). Given more pervasive deflation in Switzerland, our bias is the latter. Go long EUR/CHF for a trade. Buy Scandinavian currencies if they drop another 2% versus an equal weighted basket of the euro and USD. Go short the gold/silver ratio at 80. Chart I-14An Alternative To US Treasurys Chart I-15Buy EUR/CHF   Chester Ntonifor Foreign Exchange Strategist chestern@bcaresearch.com Footnotes 1 Please see Foreign Exchange Strategy Weekly Report, "Tail Risks In FX Markets," dated October 2, 2020. 2 Please see Geopolitical Strategy Special Report, "Gridlock," dated November 4, 2020. 3 Our Chief Strategist, Peter Berezin, argues that the Trump tax cuts could become permanent. Currencies U.S. Dollar Chart II-1USD Technicals 1 Chart II-2USD Technicals 2 Recent data from the US have been mostly positive: The ISM Manufacturing PMI increased from 55.4 to 59.3 in October, while the ISM Services PMI declined from 57.8 to 56.6. Headline PCE increased by 1.4% year-on-year in September. Nonfarm productivity increased by 4.9% quarter-on-quarter in Q3. Initial jobless claims increased by 751K for the week ending on October 30. The DXY index fell by 1.5% this week. The Fed stood on hold as widely expected, but the dollar still witnessed tremendous volatility this week. While we believe that the US dollar will depreciate in the long term, especially in the post-COVID world, we do see near-term volatilities amid the election and rising COVID numbers. Report Links: The Dollar In A Market Reset - October 30, 2020 A Few Market Observations -  October 23, 2020 Does The US Save Too Much Or Too Little? - October 16, 2020 The Euro Chart II-3EUR Technicals 1 Chart II-4EUR Technicals 2 Recent data from the euro area have been positive: GDP recovered by 12.7% quarter-on-quarter in Q3, well above the 9.4% expansion as expected. Headline inflation was unchanged at -0.3% year-on-year in Q3. Core inflation was also unchanged at 0.2% year-on-year. The unemployment rate was unchanged at 8.3% in September. PPI fell by 2.4% year-on-year in September. Retail sales increased by 2.2% year-on-year in September.  The euro increased by 0.7% against the US dollar this week. Rising COVID cases in Europe and re-implemented lockdown measures continue to spur worries for the recovery. In a speech on Wednesday, ECB Board Member Isabel Schnabel said that further monetary policy support is required to safeguard favorable financial conditions and underpin economic activity. Report Links: Addressing Client Questions - September 4, 2020 On The DXY Breakout, Euro, And Swiss Franc - February 21, 2020 Updating Our Balance Of Payments Monitor - November 29, 2019 Japanese Yen Chart II-5JPY Technicals 1 Chart II-6JPY Technicals 2 Recent data in Japan have been mostly negative: Construction orders fell by 10.6% year-on-year in September. Housing starts dropped by 9.9% year-on-year in September. The Jibun Bank Services PMI increased from 46.9 to 47.7 in October. The Japanese yen appreciated by 1% against the US dollar this week amid market volatilities. The BoJ meeting minutes released this week showed divergences among BoJ members. While most members agree that maintaining the existing monetary policy should be sufficient in current conditions, other members mentioned it would be necessary to reconsider the strategy towards achieving price targets. Report Links: The Near-Term Bull Case For The Dollar - February 28, 2020 Building A Protector Currency Portfolio - February 7, 2020 Currency Market Signals From Gold, Equities And Flows - January 31, 2020 British Pound Chart II-7GBP Technicals 1 Chart II-8GBP Technicals 2 Recent data from the UK have been positive: Nationwide housing prices increased by 5.8% year-on-year in October. The British pound increased by 0.8% against the US dollar this week. On Thursday, the BoE kept key interest rates unchanged at 0.1%. However, the Bank increased its bond-buying program by another £150 billion, much larger than expected, bringing the total amount to £895 billion. The increased stimulus plan will help weather further deterioration as the crisis continues to strike the UK’s services sector. Report Links: Revisiting Our High-Conviction Trades - September 11, 2020 Updating Our Balance Of Payments Monitor - November 29, 2019 A Few Trade Ideas - Sept. 27, 2019 Australian Dollar Chart II-9AUD Technicals 1 Chart II-10AUD Technicals 2 Recent data from Australia have been positive: Building permits increased by 8.8% year-on-year in September. Exports continued to grow by 3.9% month-on-month in September, while imports fell by 5.9% month-on-month. The trade balance jumped to A$5.6 billion in September from A$2.6 billion in the previous month. The Australian dollar surged by nearly 3% against the US dollar this week. The RBA lowered its interest rate from 0.25% to 0.1% this week to provide further support for job creation and economic recovery. Moreover, the Bank will increase the size of its QE program by purchasing A$100 billion of government bonds over the next six months. Accommodative policies, lower COVID cases and elevated current account surplus all underpin the Aussie dollar. Report Links: An Update On The Australian Dollar - September 18, 2020 On AUD And CNY - January 17, 2020 Updating Our Balance Of Payments Monitor - November 29, 2019 New Zealand Dollar Chart II-11NZD Technicals 1 Chart II-12NZD Technicals 2 Recent data from New Zealand have been mixed: Building permits increased by 3.6% month-on-month in September. The participation rate marginally increased from 69.9% to 70.1% in Q3, while the unemployment rate ticked up from 4% to 5.3% in Q3. The ANZ Activity Outlook Index was little changed at 4.6% in November. The New Zealand dollar increased by 1.5% against the US dollar this week. The latest ANZ Business Outlook report showed that New Zealand’s business outlook data remained stable. Investment intentions dropped, while employment intentions increased. Following the RBA’s action this week, the RBNZ is likely to carry out more stimulus in its policy meeting next week. Report Links: Currencies And The Value-Versus-Growth Debate - July 10, 2020 Updating Our Balance Of Payments Monitor - November 29, 2019 Place A Limit Sell On DXY At 100 - November 15, 2019 Canadian Dollar Chart II-13CAD Technicals 1 Chart II-14CAD Technicals 2 Recent data from Canada have been positive: GDP increased by 1.2% month-on-month in August. Exports marginally increased from C$44.9 billion to C$45.5 billion in September, led by higher exports of lumber and aircraft. Imports also slightly increased from C$48.1 billion to C$48.8 billion, mainly on higher crude oil imports. The Canadian dollar increased by 2.4% against the US dollar this week. On a quarter-on-quarter basis, Canada’s exports were up 26.9% in the third quarter, showing a strong recovery over the summer. However, it’s still down 7.5% compared with the same quarter last year. Report Links: Currencies And The Value-Versus-Growth Debate - July 10, 2020 More On Competitive Devaluations, The CAD And The SEK - May 1, 2020 A New Paradigm For Petrocurrencies - April 10, 2020 Swiss Franc Chart II-15CHF Technicals 1 Chart II-16CHF Technicals 2 Recent data from Switzerland have been mostly positive: Real retail sales increased by 0.3% year-on-year in September. The KOF Leading Indicator declined from 110.1 to 106.6 in October. Headline inflation increased from -0.8% to -0.6% year-on-year in October. The Swiss franc appreciated by 1.2% against the US dollar this week. The recent SECO survey showed no further recovery of consumer sentiment since the summer. As downside risks continue to loom, the SNB is likely to fight appreciation in the franc. Go long EUR/CHF as trade. Report Links: On The DXY Breakout, Euro, And Swiss Franc - February 21, 2020 Currency Market Signals From Gold, Equities And Flows - January 31, 2020 Portfolio Tweaks Before The Chinese New Year - January 24, 2020 Norwegian Krone Chart II-17NOK Technicals 1 Chart II-18NOK Technicals 2 There have been no significant data from Norway this week. The Norwegian krone soared by 4% this week, recouping the recent loss. On Thursday, the Norges Bank kept its key interest rate on hold at a record low 0%, as expected, and said that they would maintain policy accommodative until they see clear signs of a recovery. Report Links: Revisiting Our High-Conviction Trades - September 11, 2020 A New Paradigm For Petrocurrencies - April 10, 2020 Building A Protector Currency Portfolio - February 7, 2020 Swedish Krona Chart II-19SEK Technicals 1 Chart II-20SEK Technicals 2 Recent data from Sweden have been mixed: Manufacturing PMI increased from 55.9 to 58.2 in October. Industrial production declined by 2.6% year-on-year in September. Manufacturing new orders fell by 0.3% year-on-year in September. The Swedish krona increased by 2.8% against the US dollar this week. Statistics Sweden showed that GDP increased by 4.3% quarter-on-quarter in the third quarter in 2020, following an 8% drop in the second quarter. Exports and imports have recovered close to pre-pandemic levels. The labor market has also shown strength. The services industry, however, is still negatively affected by the crisis, although they make up a relatively smaller share in the GDP. Kelly Zhong Research Analyst Report Links: Revisiting Our High-Conviction Trades - September 11, 2020 Updating Our Balance Of Payments Monitor - November 29, 2019 Where To Next For The US Dollar? - June 7, 2019 Trades & Forecasts Forecast Summary Core Portfolio Tactical Trades Limit Orders Closed Trades

I will be co-hosting a webcast with our Chief Geopolitical Strategist, Matt Gertken, in which we will discuss arguably the two biggest topics of the moment. The US Election Result, And The Pandemic: What Happens Next? on Friday November 6 at 8.00AM EST (1.00PM GMT, 2.00PM CET, 9.00PM HKT). Also, in lieu of the next strategy report, I will be presenting the quarterly webcast on Thursday November 12 at 10.00AM EST (3.00PM GMT, 4.00PM CET, 11.00PM HKT). I hope you can join both webcasts. Highlights Productivity growth will continue to outperform in the US versus Europe through 2021. Equity investors should tilt towards viable small companies and businesses with operations in the US rather than in Europe. Higher productivity growth in the US means that this cycle’s low in US versus euro area core CPI inflation is unlikely to be reached until deep into 2021, at the earliest. Remain structurally overweight long-dated US bonds versus long-dated core European bonds. Structurally favour European currencies versus the dollar. Investors who cannot tolerate volatility should own CHF/USD. Investors who can tolerate volatility should own the more undervalued SEK/USD. Fractal trade: Underweight Australian construction. Feature If the economic difference between the US and Europe could be encapsulated in one picture, then the Chart of the Week would be that picture. In the US, you can hire and fire workers very easily. In Europe, you cannot. This means that in good times, the US can create millions of jobs, Europe much less so. The flip side is that in bad times, the US can destroy millions of jobs, Europe much less so. Chart of the WeekThe US Can Hire And Fire Workers. Europe Much Less So After the dot com bust of 2000, employment fell by 2 percent in the US, but did not fall at all in France. After the global financial crisis of 2008, employment fell by 6 percent in the US, but by just 1.5 percent in France. After the pandemic recession of this year, US employment has rebounded strongly, yet is still down by 7 percent. In contrast, employment in France is down by just 3 percent.  After A Recession, Productivity Surges In The US, But Not In Europe If an economy can shed millions of jobs in a recession, then it is easier to restructure the economy with a new labour-saving technology or strategy that substitutes for the labour input permanently. In which case – to paraphrase Ernest Hemingway – the economy’s productivity growth comes gradually, and then suddenly. The suddenly tends to be immediately after a recession. In Europe, where the economy cannot easily shed workers in a recession, such a sudden post-recession productivity boom never happens. In the US, it always does. For example, at the start of the Great Depression a substantial part of the US automobile industry was still based on skilled craftsmanship. These smaller, less productive craft-production plants were the ones that shut down permanently, while plants that had adopted labour-saving mass production had the competitive advantage that enabled them to survive. The result was a major restructuring of the auto productive structure. Another simple example is the ‘typing pool’ which was a ubiquitous feature of the office environment until the late 1990s. Following the 2000 downturn, these typing jobs became extinct, to be replaced by the wholesale roll-out of Microsoft Word. Productivity growth will continue to outperform in the US versus Europe through 2021. After the 2000 downturn, productivity surged by 9 percent in the US, but rose by just 2 percent in France. After the 2008 recession, productivity increased by 5 percent in the US, but did not increase at all in France. And after this year’s recession, productivity is already up by 4 percent in the US, while it is down by 1 percent in France1 (Chart I-2). Chart I-2After Recessions, Productivity Surges In The US But Not In Europe If history is any guide, productivity growth will continue to outperform in the US versus Europe through 2021. One conclusion is that equity investors should tilt towards viable small companies and businesses with operations in the US rather than in Europe. A Surge In Productivity Means Lower Inflation Yet the flip side of the post-recession productivity boom is rising unemployment. After the 2000 downturn, the number of permanently unemployed US workers continued to rise until September 2003, two years after the trough in economic activity. After the 2008 recession, permanent unemployment continued to rise until February 2010, almost a year after the economy had bottomed (Chart I-3). Chart I-3US Permanent Unemployment Peaks Well After The Economy Bottoms Therefore, optimistically assuming the pandemic trough in the economy occurred in the second quarter of 2020, the rise in the number of permanently unemployed US workers is likely to continue through the winter. In fact, it could last much longer because, compared to the global financial crisis, the pandemic is wreaking much more structural havoc on the way that we live, work, and interact. This means that compared to a common-or-garden recession, many more jobs are now economically unviable. Worse, if a resurgent pandemic causes a double-dip recession, then the peak in structural unemployment will be pushed back even further. Higher structural unemployment depresses rent inflation. Higher structural unemployment hurts the security and growth of wages. Therefore, as we pointed out in last week’s Special Report, The Real Risk Is Real Estate, one major consequence is that it depresses housing rent inflation (Chart I-4). It also depresses owner equivalent rent (OER) inflation – the imputed costs that homeowners notionally pay ‘to consume’ their home – because OER inflation closely tracks actual rent inflation (Chart I-5). Chart I-4Higher US Permanent Unemployment Depresses Rent Inflation Chart I-5Owner Equivalent Rent Inflation Tracks Actual Rent Inflation This is important for European investors, because another big difference between the US and Europe is the treatment of owner-occupied housing costs in the consumer price index (CPI). The US includes OER in its inflation rate, whereas Europe does not. The result is that shelter – the sum of OER and actual rents – carries a 42 percent weighting in the US core CPI, compared with just a 13 percent weighting in the euro area core CPI. Hence, US core CPI inflation closely tracks rent inflation (Chart I-6). Meaning that US core CPI inflation reaches its cycle low only after the number of permanently unemployed workers reaches its peak. This holds true both in absolute terms, and in relative terms versus euro area core CPI inflation. After the 2000 downturn, both the absolute and relative inflation cycle lows were not reached until late 2003. After the 2008 recession, the inflation lows were not reached until late 2010 (Chart I-7 and Chart I-8). Chart I-6US Core CPI Inflation Tracks ##br##Rent Inflation Chart I-7Only After Permanent Unemployment Peaks Does US Core Inflation Bottom, Both In Absolute Terms... Chart I-8...And Relative To Euro Area Core CPI Inflation On this basis, this cycle’s low in US versus euro area core CPI inflation is unlikely to be reached until deep into 2021, even on the most optimistic assumptions. Some Investment Conclusions From an investment perspective, US versus euro area core CPI inflation is important because it drives relative bond yields. As the spread between relative inflation rates compresses, the spread between long-dated bond yields also compresses (Chart I-9). Chart I-9When US And Euro Area Core CPI Inflation Rates Converge, So Do US And Euro Area Bond Yields One conclusion is to remain overweight long-dated US bonds versus long-dated core European bonds. Our preferred expression is to stay overweight a 50:50 portfolio of higher yielding US T-bonds and Spanish Bonos versus a 50:50 portfolio of near-zero yielding German Bunds and French OATs. In this strategic position, any price moves in the aftermath of the US election result are just short-term noise. A second conclusion is that the likely yield spread compression between US and European long-dated bond yields will structurally favour European currencies versus the dollar. Though an important caveat is that the dollar will retain its haven qualities during periods of market stress, because many haven assets and markets are denominated in the greenback.  Remain overweight long-dated US bonds versus long-dated core European bonds. Therefore, investors who cannot tolerate volatility should own Europe’s haven currency, the Swiss franc versus the dollar. Investors who can tolerate volatility should own the more undervalued Swedish krona versus the dollar. Fractal Trading System* This week’s recommended trade is to underweight the Australian construction sector versus the market. One way to implement this is to short an equally-weighted basket of James Hardie, Lendlease, and Boral versus the market. Set the profit target and symmetrical stop-loss at 5.7 percent. In other trades, short MSCI Finland versus MSCI Switzerland achieved its 7 percent profit target. But long 30-year T-bond versus French 30-year OAT reached its 3.2 percent stop-loss just before the T-bond’s strong post-election rally. The rolling 1-year win ratio now stands at 53 percent. Chart I-10Australia: Construction Materials Vs. Market When the fractal dimension approaches the lower limit after an investment has been in an established trend it is a potential trigger for a liquidity-triggered trend reversal. Therefore, open a countertrend position. The profit target is a one-third reversal of the preceding 13-week move. Apply a symmetrical stop-loss. Close the position at the profit target or stop-loss. Otherwise close the position after 13 weeks. * For more details please see the European Investment Strategy Special Report “Fractals, Liquidity & A Trading Model,” dated   December 11, 2014, available at eis.bcaresearch.com.   Dhaval Joshi Chief European Investment Strategist dhaval@bcaresearch.com Footnotes 1 Productivity is defined here as real GDP per employed person, and productivity growth is quoted for the periods q1 2002 through q4 2003, q2 2008 through q4 2010, and q4 2019 through q3 2020. Fractal Trading System   Cyclical Recommendations Structural Recommendations Closed Fractal Trades Trades Closed Trades Asset Performance Currency & Bond Equity Sector Country Equity Indicators Bond Yields Chart II-1Indicators To Watch - Bond Yields Chart II-2Indicators To Watch - Bond Yields Chart II-3Indicators To Watch - Bond Yields Chart II-4Indicators To Watch - Bond Yields Interest Rate Chart II-5Indicators To Watch - Interest Rate Expectations Chart II-6Indicators To Watch - Interest Rate Expectations Chart II-7Indicators To Watch - Interest Rate Expectations Chart II-8Indicators To Watch - Interest Rate Expectations

Highlights Our base case of a Biden win with a GOP Senate may come to pass. But the US election is not over yet. Trump still has a chance of victory by winning Pennsylvania and one other state. If the vote count does not settle the outcome clearly this week, a full-fledged contested election will emerge that may not be settled until just before December 14 (or even January). Risk-off sentiment will prevail in the interim, given the importance of the executive-legislative configuration for the pandemic response and the fiscal policy outlook. What we know is that Republicans kept the Senate, in line with our final forecast last week. This means gridlock is assured – which is positive for US stocks beyond near-term fiscal risks. Stay long JPY-USD, short CNY-USD, long stocks over bonds, long health care equipment, and long infrastructure plays. Keep dry powder for the presidential outcome, as global trade hangs in the balance. Feature The US presidential election is unsettled as we go to press, but we know that Republicans will keep control of the Senate and hence that American government will be divided or “gridlocked” for the next two years. As things stand, Democrats picked up two senate seats, Arizona and Colorado, but fell short everywhere else. They may even have lost a seat in Michigan. This leaves the balance of power at ~52-48 in favor of Republicans – which is one seat better than our final 51-49 forecast in their favor (Chart 1).1 Chart 1Our Senate Election Model Correctly Predicted Republican Control Table 1Gridlock Is Inevitable Regardless Of Presidential Outcome Gridlock is the inevitable consequence. If President Trump pulls off a victory in any two of the upper Midwestern states (Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin), then he will still face a Democrat-controlled House of Representatives. If former Vice President Joe Biden pulls off a victory in two of these states, then he will face a Republican controlled Senate (Table 1). Chart 2Gridlock More Favorable Than Sweep For Wall Street, But Fiscal Risks Abound In Short Run Historically gridlock offers more upside for the S&P 500 than a single-party sweep (Chart 2), and we agree with this expectation when it comes to the long-run impact of this election. However, we have also warned against the fiscal risks of a Biden win with a Republican Senate in the short run. The status quo Trump gridlock is reflationary at first but later problematic due to trade war. The Biden gridlock is deflationary at first but the best outcome for investors over the long run. Consider the following: Trump with Senate Republicans: Trump is a spendthrift and he and his party joined the House Democrats in blowing out the budget deficit from 2018-20. Trump’s victory will force House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to concede to a Republican-drafted ~$1-$1.5 trillion new COVID-19 fiscal relief bill right away. For the second term, Trump will push an infrastructure bill, border security, and make his tax cuts permanent. The fiscal thrust in 2021 will be flat-to-up. The budget deficit will probably end up somewhere between the Republican “high spending” scenario and the Democratic “low spending” scenario in our budget deficit projections (Chart 3). This is positive for US growth and especially corporate earnings, but it comes with a catch: Trump will be emboldened in his trade wars, which could expand beyond China to Europe or others. Tariffs and currency depreciation will weigh on global growth. Still, Trump’s second term will occur in the early stages of the business cycle and the Fed is committed not to hike rates until 2023, so the overall picture is reflationary.   Chart 3Trump Gridlock Reflationary, Biden Gridlock Deflationary Over Short Run Biden with Senate Republicans: Since Senate Republicans did not capitulate to large Democratic spending demands prior to the election, when their seats were at risk, they will have less incentive to do so afterwards when the president hails from the opposing party. The only way they will agree to a new fiscal stimulus in the “lame duck” session (November-December) is if the Democrats concede to their skinny proposals for the time being. But Democrats will probably insist on their demands having made electoral gains. In this case, either financial markets will sell off, forcing Republicans to capitulate, or investors will have to wait until early 2021 to receive a new fiscal bill that is uncertain in size and timing. The first battle of Biden’s presidency will be with the GOP Senate. The Republican “low spending” scenario in Chart 3 is most likely. It is not realistic that Congress will allow the baseline scenario, in which the budget deficit contracts by ~7.4% of GDP. Republican senators today are not the Tea Party House Republicans of 2010, who were rabid fiscal hawks. Still, uncertainty will weigh heavily and markets will have to fall before GOP senators wake up to the underlying risk to the economic recovery. The consolation is that beyond this 3-6 month period of negative sentiment and deflationary fiscal risk, the outlook will be fairly positive. Biden will not use broad-based unilateral tariffs the way Trump did, with the possible exception of China later in his term. And the Republican Senate will not agree to tax hikes at any point, making taxes a concern for 2023 or thereafter. This is the best of both worlds for US business sentiment and the corporate earnings outlook over the two-year period. Risk-off sentiment will prevail until the election is decided. This could be in a couple of days if the vote count is clear in Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. Or it could extend until just before December 14, when the Electoral College votes, if the litigation and court rulings in these critical states drag on, which we discuss below. The reason risk-off sentiment will prevail is that the US economy is burning through its remaining stimulus funds rapidly, the fiscal trajectory is unclear until the presidency is decided, Europe is going into partial lockdowns over the pandemic, and a Biden victory would imply more US lockdowns. Diagram 1 outlines the macro and market implications as we see them, depending on the presidential outcome. We never took the view that a Democratic sweep of White House and Senate would be the best outcome for the overall investment outlook, though we conceded that it was the most reflationary and bullish in the short term. But now this point is moot. Investors will have to wait another two years at minimum for the full smorgasbord of Democratic spending proposals to have a chance at passage. Diagram 1Gridlock Rules Out Massive Fiscal Boost Bottom Line: The presidency is indeterminate as we go to press. What is clear is that Republicans retained the Senate. Therefore gridlock will prevail. This is generally market positive, though a Biden win would weigh on risk assets in the near term until financial markets force Republican senators to capitulate to a new fiscal bill. A Controversial Election Or A Contested Election? The critical battleground states are undecided as we go to press. Trump needs to win any two of Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin to retain the White House. The vote count will last through Wednesday and possibly beyond. The Republican and Democratic legal teams are preparing for trench warfare. Major legal challenges are highly likely and will delay the final outcome into December or even January. The first thing is to finish counting the absentee and mail-in ballots. Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Arizona are not accepting ballots after election day, so they will finish counting soon. Then all that remains is to see if any legal disputes arise that prevent the Electoral College members from being settled in these states, which is still possible. For example, Wisconsin is within a percentage point. Nevada will accept ballots by November 10 and North Carolina by November 12 as long as they are postmarked by election day. It is likely but not certain that Democrats will keep Nevada (~75% counted) while Republicans will keep North Carolina (~100% counted). Thus Pennsylvania poses the biggest risk of a contested result – and this was anticipated. The deadline to receive mailed ballots is Friday, November 6, but a legal dispute is already underway as to whether the original November 3 deadline should be reinstated.2 We will not pretend to predict the final court verdict on Pennsylvania, but it would not be surprising at all if the Supreme Court ruled that ballots received after election day cannot be accepted. The constitution grants state legislatures the sole power of choosing a state’s electors. Each state passes its own election laws. The Pennsylvania state legislature clearly stated that ballots must be returned by election day. It was a court decision that extended the deadline. The Supreme Court could easily determine that a lower court does not have the power to change the deadline. But nobody will know until the court rules. The fact that Trump appointed several of the judges has little bearing on their decisions because they serve lifetime appointments. Once election disputes rise above state vote-counting to the federal level, Trump gets a lifeline. First, the two-seat conservative leaning on the Supreme Court should produce strict readings of the law that could favor his bid. Second, the GOP’s victory in the Senate means that Democrats cannot unilaterally settle disputed electoral votes in their own favor at the joint session of Congress on January 6, which they could have done with a united Congress. Third, the Republicans are likely to have maintained a one or two-state majority of state delegations in the House of Representatives (based on results as we go to press), which means that Trump would win if the candidates failed to reach a 270-vote majority on the Electoral College or tied at 269. Note that an Electoral College tie is a distinct possibility in this election. Right now, if Trump loses in Michigan and Wisconsin, but wins Pennsylvania, and nothing else changes, then an Electoral College tie could result at 269-269 electoral votes.3 Polls … And Exit Polls Before condemning the entire profession of opinion pollsters to death it will be important to receive the verified results of the election and compare them with the final polling averages. It is clear that Trump was widely underrated yet again, but it is not yet clear that this was primarily or exclusively the fault of pollsters. Right now Trump is down by 1.8% in the nationwide popular vote, whereas he lagged by 7.2% in the average of the national polls and 2.3% in the battleground average on election day. This is a big 5.4% gap in the national poll, but in the battleground poll it is a minor 0.5% polling gap and as such merely confirms what many observers knew, that the battleground polls were the ones that really mattered due to the Electoral College. Trump’s battleground support average was 46.6% and his approval rating was 45.9% on election day, which respectively is 1.8% and 2.5% below his tentative share of the national vote at 48.4%. These gaps are within the average 3% margin of error – and normally sitting presidents outperform their polling by around 1%. State opinion polling had huge errors like the national poll. Charts 4 and 4B shows the final election polling in the critical swing states along with a “T” or “B” to mark Trump’s and Biden’s tentative vote share as we go to press. Swing state polls showed Trump staging a major rally in the final weeks of the campaign, which is what prompted us to upgrade his odds to 45%. Neither major pundits nor the mainstream media paid enough attention to this shift. Several prominent outlets denied that there was any real tightening in the polls even in late October. Chart 4APundits Overlooked Trump’s Rally In Swing State Polls In Final Weeks Chart 4BPundits Overlooked Trump’s Rally In Swing State Polls In Final Weeks What this demonstrates to us is the power of momentum in opinion polling, especially in the final week before an election when people’s attitudes harden and they bare more of their true opinions. It does not tell us that opinion polling is dead. What about the exit polls? Biden cut into Trump’s lead in key demographic groups just as the Democratic Party machinery anticipated, but it is not clear if it was enough to win the election. Trump lost ground and Democrats gained ground, relative to 2016, with white voters, old folks, and non-college-educated voters. But Trump improved his support among blacks and Hispanics, a signal point that gives the lie to much of this year’s media hype (Charts 5A and 5B). Chart 5ADemocrats Gained Ground With White, Elderly, And Non-College-Educated Voters; GOP Gained Among Blacks And Hispanics Chart 5BDemocrats Gained Ground With White, Elderly, And Non-College-Educated Voters; GOP Gained Among Blacks And Hispanics By far voters cared most about the issues, not personalities, and the biggest issue was the economy (35% of voters versus 20% on racial inequality and 17% on the coronavirus, which was apparently overrated as an issue by Democrats). The economic focus is the only explanation for Trump’s outperformance – the law and order narrative was less popular. Trump’s vote share may end up exactly equal to the number of respondents who said the economy was “good” or “excellent” (48%). Otherwise Trump’s base is well known: it consists predominantly of white people, rural people, those in the Midwest and South, those who have been fairly successful in income, and those who think America needs a “strong leader” more than a unifier with good judgment who seems to care about the average person. If Trump is defeated, the clear implication is that he failed to expand his base. If he wins, the clear implication is that Democrats suffered in the key regions for their aggressive approach to COVID lockdowns, their condoning of lawlessness, and their divisive handling of racial inequality and police brutality. With such a close vote for the White House, sweeping narratives are questionable. It is not clear yet whether liberalism or nationalism won, and at any rate the margin was thin. What is clear is that Democrats substantially disappointed in the Senate and they might even have failed to gain the White House. Given that this year witnessed a recession, pandemic, and widespread social unrest – well-attested historical signs that point to the failure of the incumbent party and recession – Democrats apparently failed to capitalize. National exit polls suggest the fault lay in their relative neglect of bread and butter in favor of the coronavirus or left-wing social theory. This is true not so much in the House of Representatives but in the presidential and senate races. If Trump wins – especially through a contested election – then US political polarization will rise due to the continued divergence of popular opinion and the constitutional system. “Peak polarization” will last another four years at least. But if Trump loses, given that Republicans held the Senate, there is room for compromise that would reduce polarization. But it is too early to say. Investment Takeaways Trade and foreign policy hinge on the presidency. Trump is favored in several of the key states at the moment and he is especially favored in a contested election process, but it is too soon to make investment recommendations on the executive branch other than that US equity outperformance is likely to continue on both of the scenarios at hand. Table 2Earnings Shock From Partial Repeal Of Trump Tax Cuts Has Been Averted For now we recommend investors stay long JPY-USD, short CNY-USD, long health care equipment, and overweight stocks relative to bonds. On the Senate, the key takeaway is that Biden and the Democrats will not be able to raise taxes. This is a big benefit to the sectors that faced the greatest earnings shock from a partial repeal of Trump’s Tax Cuts and Jobs Act – namely real estate, tech, health care, utilities, consumer discretionary, and financials (Table 2). A simple play on these sectoral benefits courtesy of Anastasios Avgeriou, our US equity strategist, would be to go long small caps versus large caps, i.e. S&P 600 relative to the S&P 500, but wait till the fiscal hurdle is cleared. The BCA infrastructure basket should benefit regardless, as infrastructure is one of the few areas of bipartisan agreement, especially amid a large output gap.   Matt Gertken Vice President Geopolitical Strategy mattg@bcaresearch.com   Footnotes 1 We upgraded the Republicans to favored status last week based on our quantitative Senate election model, which showed a 51% chance that Republicans would maintain control, with 51-49 votes. Our presidential model also showed Trump winning with a 51% chance, but we subjectively capped his odds at 45% due to our doubts about his ability to win Michigan given Biden’s 4% lead in head-to-head public opinion polls there. 2 It is possible that Nevada’s November 10 deadline or North Carolina’s November 12 deadline could become relevant, but we doubt it. 3 Precise Electoral College outcomes cannot be predicted due to faithless electors, i.e. electoral college members who vote differently than required based on their state’s popular vote. In 2016 there were seven faithless electors and in 2020 there could be several and they could make the difference. Material punishments may not prevent an elector from making a conscientious decision to stray from his or her state’s results in an election viewed as having historic importance.

Special Report

Highlights Our base case of a Biden win with a GOP Senate may come to pass. But the US election is not over yet. Trump still has a chance of victory by winning Pennsylvania and one other state. If the vote count does not settle the outcome clearly this week, a full-fledged contested election will emerge that may not be settled until just before December 14 (or even January). Risk-off sentiment will prevail in the interim, given the importance of the executive-legislative configuration for the pandemic response and the fiscal policy outlook. What we know is that Republicans kept the Senate, in line with our final forecast last week. This means gridlock is assured – which is positive for US stocks beyond near-term fiscal risks. Stay long JPY-USD, short CNY-USD, long stocks over bonds, long health care equipment, and long infrastructure plays. Keep dry powder for the presidential outcome, as global trade hangs in the balance. Feature The US presidential election is unsettled as we go to press, but we know that Republicans will keep control of the Senate and hence that American government will be divided or “gridlocked” for the next two years. As things stand, Democrats picked up two senate seats, Arizona and Colorado, but fell short everywhere else. They may even have lost a seat in Michigan. This leaves the balance of power at ~52-48 in favor of Republicans – which is one seat better than our final 51-49 forecast in their favor (Chart 1).1 Chart 1Our Senate Election Model Correctly Predicted Republican Control Table 1Gridlock Is Inevitable Regardless Of Presidential Outcome Gridlock is the inevitable consequence. If President Trump pulls off a victory in any two of the upper Midwestern states (Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin), then he will still face a Democrat-controlled House of Representatives. If former Vice President Joe Biden pulls off a victory in two of these states, then he will face a Republican controlled Senate (Table 1). Chart 2Gridlock More Favorable Than Sweep For Wall Street, But Fiscal Risks Abound In Short Run Historically gridlock offers more upside for the S&P 500 than a single-party sweep (Chart 2), and we agree with this expectation when it comes to the long-run impact of this election. However, we have also warned against the fiscal risks of a Biden win with a Republican Senate in the short run. The status quo Trump gridlock is reflationary at first but later problematic due to trade war. The Biden gridlock is deflationary at first but the best outcome for investors over the long run. Consider the following: Trump with Senate Republicans: Trump is a spendthrift and he and his party joined the House Democrats in blowing out the budget deficit from 2018-20. Trump’s victory will force House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to concede to a Republican-drafted ~$1-$1.5 trillion new COVID-19 fiscal relief bill right away. For the second term, Trump will push an infrastructure bill, border security, and make his tax cuts permanent. The fiscal thrust in 2021 will be flat-to-up. The budget deficit will probably end up somewhere between the Republican “high spending” scenario and the Democratic “low spending” scenario in our budget deficit projections (Chart 3). This is positive for US growth and especially corporate earnings, but it comes with a catch: Trump will be emboldened in his trade wars, which could expand beyond China to Europe or others. Tariffs and currency depreciation will weigh on global growth. Still, Trump’s second term will occur in the early stages of the business cycle and the Fed is committed not to hike rates until 2023, so the overall picture is reflationary.   Chart 3Trump Gridlock Reflationary, Biden Gridlock Deflationary Over Short Run Biden with Senate Republicans: Since Senate Republicans did not capitulate to large Democratic spending demands prior to the election, when their seats were at risk, they will have less incentive to do so afterwards when the president hails from the opposing party. The only way they will agree to a new fiscal stimulus in the “lame duck” session (November-December) is if the Democrats concede to their skinny proposals for the time being. But Democrats will probably insist on their demands having made electoral gains. In this case, either financial markets will sell off, forcing Republicans to capitulate, or investors will have to wait until early 2021 to receive a new fiscal bill that is uncertain in size and timing. The first battle of Biden’s presidency will be with the GOP Senate. The Republican “low spending” scenario in Chart 3 is most likely. It is not realistic that Congress will allow the baseline scenario, in which the budget deficit contracts by ~7.4% of GDP. Republican senators today are not the Tea Party House Republicans of 2010, who were rabid fiscal hawks. Still, uncertainty will weigh heavily and markets will have to fall before GOP senators wake up to the underlying risk to the economic recovery. The consolation is that beyond this 3-6 month period of negative sentiment and deflationary fiscal risk, the outlook will be fairly positive. Biden will not use broad-based unilateral tariffs the way Trump did, with the possible exception of China later in his term. And the Republican Senate will not agree to tax hikes at any point, making taxes a concern for 2023 or thereafter. This is the best of both worlds for US business sentiment and the corporate earnings outlook over the two-year period. Risk-off sentiment will prevail until the election is decided. This could be in a couple of days if the vote count is clear in Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. Or it could extend until just before December 14, when the Electoral College votes, if the litigation and court rulings in these critical states drag on, which we discuss below. The reason risk-off sentiment will prevail is that the US economy is burning through its remaining stimulus funds rapidly, the fiscal trajectory is unclear until the presidency is decided, Europe is going into partial lockdowns over the pandemic, and a Biden victory would imply more US lockdowns. Diagram 1 outlines the macro and market implications as we see them, depending on the presidential outcome. We never took the view that a Democratic sweep of White House and Senate would be the best outcome for the overall investment outlook, though we conceded that it was the most reflationary and bullish in the short term. But now this point is moot. Investors will have to wait another two years at minimum for the full smorgasbord of Democratic spending proposals to have a chance at passage. Diagram 1Gridlock Rules Out Massive Fiscal Boost Bottom Line: The presidency is indeterminate as we go to press. What is clear is that Republicans retained the Senate. Therefore gridlock will prevail. This is generally market positive, though a Biden win would weigh on risk assets in the near term until financial markets force Republican senators to capitulate to a new fiscal bill. A Controversial Election Or A Contested Election? The critical battleground states are undecided as we go to press. Trump needs to win any two of Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin to retain the White House. The vote count will last through Wednesday and possibly beyond. The Republican and Democratic legal teams are preparing for trench warfare. Major legal challenges are highly likely and will delay the final outcome into December or even January. The first thing is to finish counting the absentee and mail-in ballots. Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Arizona are not accepting ballots after election day, so they will finish counting soon. Then all that remains is to see if any legal disputes arise that prevent the Electoral College members from being settled in these states, which is still possible. For example, Wisconsin is within a percentage point. Nevada will accept ballots by November 10 and North Carolina by November 12 as long as they are postmarked by election day. It is likely but not certain that Democrats will keep Nevada (~75% counted) while Republicans will keep North Carolina (~100% counted). Thus Pennsylvania poses the biggest risk of a contested result – and this was anticipated. The deadline to receive mailed ballots is Friday, November 6, but a legal dispute is already underway as to whether the original November 3 deadline should be reinstated.2 We will not pretend to predict the final court verdict on Pennsylvania, but it would not be surprising at all if the Supreme Court ruled that ballots received after election day cannot be accepted. The constitution grants state legislatures the sole power of choosing a state’s electors. Each state passes its own election laws. The Pennsylvania state legislature clearly stated that ballots must be returned by election day. It was a court decision that extended the deadline. The Supreme Court could easily determine that a lower court does not have the power to change the deadline. But nobody will know until the court rules. The fact that Trump appointed several of the judges has little bearing on their decisions because they serve lifetime appointments. Once election disputes rise above state vote-counting to the federal level, Trump gets a lifeline. First, the two-seat conservative leaning on the Supreme Court should produce strict readings of the law that could favor his bid. Second, the GOP’s victory in the Senate means that Democrats cannot unilaterally settle disputed electoral votes in their own favor at the joint session of Congress on January 6, which they could have done with a united Congress. Third, the Republicans are likely to have maintained a one or two-state majority of state delegations in the House of Representatives (based on results as we go to press), which means that Trump would win if the candidates failed to reach a 270-vote majority on the Electoral College or tied at 269. Note that an Electoral College tie is a distinct possibility in this election. Right now, if Trump loses in Michigan and Wisconsin, but wins Pennsylvania, and nothing else changes, then an Electoral College tie could result at 269-269 electoral votes.3 Polls … And Exit Polls Before condemning the entire profession of opinion pollsters to death it will be important to receive the verified results of the election and compare them with the final polling averages. It is clear that Trump was widely underrated yet again, but it is not yet clear that this was primarily or exclusively the fault of pollsters. Right now Trump is down by 1.8% in the nationwide popular vote, whereas he lagged by 7.2% in the average of the national polls and 2.3% in the battleground average on election day. This is a big 5.4% gap in the national poll, but in the battleground poll it is a minor 0.5% polling gap and as such merely confirms what many observers knew, that the battleground polls were the ones that really mattered due to the Electoral College. Trump’s battleground support average was 46.6% and his approval rating was 45.9% on election day, which respectively is 1.8% and 2.5% below his tentative share of the national vote at 48.4%. These gaps are within the average 3% margin of error – and normally sitting presidents outperform their polling by around 1%. State opinion polling had huge errors like the national poll. Charts 4 and 4B shows the final election polling in the critical swing states along with a “T” or “B” to mark Trump’s and Biden’s tentative vote share as we go to press. Swing state polls showed Trump staging a major rally in the final weeks of the campaign, which is what prompted us to upgrade his odds to 45%. Neither major pundits nor the mainstream media paid enough attention to this shift. Several prominent outlets denied that there was any real tightening in the polls even in late October. Chart 4APundits Overlooked Trump’s Rally In Swing State Polls In Final Weeks Chart 4BPundits Overlooked Trump’s Rally In Swing State Polls In Final Weeks What this demonstrates to us is the power of momentum in opinion polling, especially in the final week before an election when people’s attitudes harden and they bare more of their true opinions. It does not tell us that opinion polling is dead. What about the exit polls? Biden cut into Trump’s lead in key demographic groups just as the Democratic Party machinery anticipated, but it is not clear if it was enough to win the election. Trump lost ground and Democrats gained ground, relative to 2016, with white voters, old folks, and non-college-educated voters. But Trump improved his support among blacks and Hispanics, a signal point that gives the lie to much of this year’s media hype (Charts 5A and 5B). Chart 5ADemocrats Gained Ground With White, Elderly, And Non-College-Educated Voters; GOP Gained Among Blacks And Hispanics Chart 5BDemocrats Gained Ground With White, Elderly, And Non-College-Educated Voters; GOP Gained Among Blacks And Hispanics By far voters cared most about the issues, not personalities, and the biggest issue was the economy (35% of voters versus 20% on racial inequality and 17% on the coronavirus, which was apparently overrated as an issue by Democrats). The economic focus is the only explanation for Trump’s outperformance – the law and order narrative was less popular. Trump’s vote share may end up exactly equal to the number of respondents who said the economy was “good” or “excellent” (48%). Otherwise Trump’s base is well known: it consists predominantly of white people, rural people, those in the Midwest and South, those who have been fairly successful in income, and those who think America needs a “strong leader” more than a unifier with good judgment who seems to care about the average person. If Trump is defeated, the clear implication is that he failed to expand his base. If he wins, the clear implication is that Democrats suffered in the key regions for their aggressive approach to COVID lockdowns, their condoning of lawlessness, and their divisive handling of racial inequality and police brutality. With such a close vote for the White House, sweeping narratives are questionable. It is not clear yet whether liberalism or nationalism won, and at any rate the margin was thin. What is clear is that Democrats substantially disappointed in the Senate and they might even have failed to gain the White House. Given that this year witnessed a recession, pandemic, and widespread social unrest – well-attested historical signs that point to the failure of the incumbent party and recession – Democrats apparently failed to capitalize. National exit polls suggest the fault lay in their relative neglect of bread and butter in favor of the coronavirus or left-wing social theory. This is true not so much in the House of Representatives but in the presidential and senate races. If Trump wins – especially through a contested election – then US political polarization will rise due to the continued divergence of popular opinion and the constitutional system. “Peak polarization” will last another four years at least. But if Trump loses, given that Republicans held the Senate, there is room for compromise that would reduce polarization. But it is too early to say. Investment Takeaways Trade and foreign policy hinge on the presidency. Trump is favored in several of the key states at the moment and he is especially favored in a contested election process, but it is too soon to make investment recommendations on the executive branch other than that US equity outperformance is likely to continue on both of the scenarios at hand. Table 2Earnings Shock From Partial Repeal Of Trump Tax Cuts Has Been Averted For now we recommend investors stay long JPY-USD, short CNY-USD, long health care equipment, and overweight stocks relative to bonds. On the Senate, the key takeaway is that Biden and the Democrats will not be able to raise taxes. This is a big benefit to the sectors that faced the greatest earnings shock from a partial repeal of Trump’s Tax Cuts and Jobs Act – namely real estate, tech, health care, utilities, consumer discretionary, and financials (Table 2). A simple play on these sectoral benefits courtesy of Anastasios Avgeriou, our US equity strategist, would be to go long small caps versus large caps, i.e. S&P 600 relative to the S&P 500, but wait till the fiscal hurdle is cleared. The BCA infrastructure basket should benefit regardless, as infrastructure is one of the few areas of bipartisan agreement, especially amid a large output gap.   Matt Gertken Vice President Geopolitical Strategy mattg@bcaresearch.com   Footnotes 1 We upgraded the Republicans to favored status last week based on our quantitative Senate election model, which showed a 51% chance that Republicans would maintain control, with 51-49 votes. Our presidential model also showed Trump winning with a 51% chance, but we subjectively capped his odds at 45% due to our doubts about his ability to win Michigan given Biden’s 4% lead in head-to-head public opinion polls there. 2 It is possible that Nevada’s November 10 deadline or North Carolina’s November 12 deadline could become relevant, but we doubt it. 3 Precise Electoral College outcomes cannot be predicted due to faithless electors, i.e. electoral college members who vote differently than required based on their state’s popular vote. In 2016 there were seven faithless electors and in 2020 there could be several and they could make the difference. Material punishments may not prevent an elector from making a conscientious decision to stray from his or her state’s results in an election viewed as having historic importance.

Your feedback is important to us. Please take our client survey today. Highlights The long-term outlook for the dollar is bearish, but fresh shorts could be offside over the next one to three months. An uptick in US political uncertainty adds to our bullish dollar view over the next month. Stay short USD/JPY as a core holding for now. Beyond the near term, the Scandinavian currencies are best positioned for outperformance over the next 12 months. Silver is selling off relative to gold. Being long silver is a long-term bet that will pay handsome returns, but stand aside for now. Feature November is seasonally a good month for the dollar, and this year could well prove no exception (Chart I-1). Just a few days ago, the market consensus was that the dollar would decline irrespective of who sits in the Oval Office next year. A few days later and the market woke up to the realization that such a “heads I win, tails I win” bet rarely pans out smoothly. We have been very sympathetic to a dollar-bearish view over the long term, but as we highlighted last week, a few indicators have not passed our smell test, setting up the potential for a knee-jerk dollar rally. To add to this thesis, the rise in the greenback this week (and bloodbath in financial markets) has eerie historical echoes with the recent past. Remarkably, since the 2009 global financial crisis and the ensuing 2011 dollar bull market, the greenback has tended to stage its most powerful rallies into year-end. Chart I-2 shows that even after adjusting for the dollar uptrend over the last decade, November to January have proven to be very good months for dollar-long positions. This was particularly notable in 2009, 2011, 2014 and 2017 (Chart I-3). Chart I-1The Dollar Loves November Chart I-2The Dollar Since GFC Chart I-3The Dollar Is Oversold We are no technical experts, but could this time be different, especially given so many uncertainties clouding the investment outlook? And if so, what are other catalysts for a dollar bounce, other than those penned in report last week? What Could Be Different? Chart I-4The Dollar Rally Occurs In Two Phases Crises are rarely solved with one silver bullet. Historians can try to justify this over the last several centuries, but for the dollar call, it is instructive to simply re-examine the significant events we have lived through since the Great Financial Crisis. Enter 2008. The dollar rally occurred in two phases. The first phase prompted the US authorities to act by dropping interest rates, which dampened the rally and stimulated reflation. When the crisis proved bigger than the authorities expected, indiscriminate liquidation by financial market participants eventually prompted more action (Chart I-4). To be specific, the US first introduced swap lines with a select few central banks in December 2007 in response to the dollar crisis following the collapse of the housing market. These swap lines allowed foreign central banks to draw on dollar liquidity directly from the Federal Reserve and use this to provide credit to domestic concerns. However, from March to October 2008, the dollar soared by about 25%, since the swap lines did not include emerging markets. This prompted the Fed to expand its swap lines to include more developed-market participants and some emerging market countries. When the crisis proved bigger than the authorities expected, indiscriminate liquidation by financial market participants eventually prompted more action.  If we consider the situation today, we can all agree that the nature of the crisis is quite different from 2008, but the severity is as important, if not greater. However, similar to 2008, the Fed only has swap lines with 14 central banks. Moreover, the six-month original window is expiring. Granted, cross-currency basis swaps do not suggest any imminent danger (Chart I-5). Nevertheless, emerging market countries like South Africa, Turkey, India, Indonesia, and Russia do not have direct access to dollar liquidity from the Fed and are at risk to torpedo the dollar decline. Chart I-5No Funding Stresses For Now In short, many emerging market central banks do not have swap agreements with the US. These are countries with huge dollar liabilities that could continue to see their currencies fall, pushing up the aggregate dollar index. Developed market commodity currencies tend to be highly correlated with emerging market currencies, so this dynamic is very important for the US dollar call (Chart I-6). Meanwhile, there is a huge pool within the financial architecture unable to access funding through central bank swap lines. To be exact, around 60% of outstanding foreign exchange swaps/forwards are among non-bank financial and other institutions. Hedge funds are included in this group, and they entail a lot more credit risk than any central bank would be willing to bear. Then there is the Fed’s FIMA facility. This is a temporary repo facility for foreign and international monetary authorities (FIMA) that allows account holders to temporarily exchange their Treasury securities held with the Fed for US dollars. However, the pool of Treasury securities available to swap for US dollars has shrunk significantly. This has been on the back of slowing global trade and conscious diversification of reserves by offshore concerns (Chart I-7). Chart I-6EM And DM Currencies Chart I-7A Smaller Pool Of Treasurys To Sell The bottom line is that there is a window between a crisis and action by the Fed that could exacerbate the knee-jerk rally in the US dollar, as we have been highlighting in recent weeks. For now, there remains ample room for foreign central banks to draw on dollar liquidity (Chart I-8). As such, the dollar bounce will be an opportunity to establish fresh short positions rather than signal a renewed bull market. Chart I-8Ample Swap Liquidity Currency Positions US Dollar: A temporary dip in inflation expectations in the US will boost real rates and encourage flows back into US fixed-income assets. The drop in oil prices, which has been moving neck in neck with US inflation expectations, corroborates this view (Chart I-9). The DXY could easily touch 96 before consolidating gains. Chart I-9US Inflation Expectations Could Drop Euro: It remains unclear the disbursement of the funds from the pandemic emergency purchase program (PEPP). In the meantime, the European Central Bank stood pat today, confirming the narrative that Europe might be out of monetary bullets and fiscal policy is needed to revive animal spirits. This could cause air pocket for EUR/USD, which could touch 1.15 before rebounding. Yen: The yen is a perfect “heads I win, tails I don’t lose much bet.” Japan is one of the few countries offering positive real rates (Chart I-10). Switzerland also falls in that category. In a world that can temporarily dip into deflation, one might prefer to be in US dollars, but the yen and Swiss franc will also hold up nicely. Chart I-10Only In Japan And Switzerland Loonie: Our colleagues at the Daily Insights summarized the Bank Of Canada’s actions this week as technical and not fundamental (Chart I-11). With no real change in monetary policy, Canadian asset prices will remain dominated by global trends. The CAD has cyclical upside versus the USD, as we wrote about, but the current period of market tumult should push the loonie lower in the coming month or two. Chart I-11Canada Versus US Scandinavian currencies: The NOK and SEK have borne the brunt of the dollar decline so far and will bounce the most once reflation is back in play. We have a limit buy order on Nordic currencies should they decline further (Chart I-12). Chart I-12Dollar Seasonality Relative Value: Focus on relative value at the crosses rather than outright dollar bets. We are short the NZD/CAD, CAD/NOK and EUR/GBP as plays on relative fundamentals. EUR/GBP remains at risk of a significant selloff if we get a Brexit deal. Oil currencies: Remain long petrocurrencies versus the euro, but we are looking to use the tactical bounce in the dollar to shift to USD shorts. Silver: Short-term investors should stand aside on silver for now. The bullish thesis remains intact but volatility will rise in the short term.   Chester Ntonifor Foreign Exchange Strategist chestern@bcaresearch.com Currencies U.S. Dollar Chart II-1USD Technicals 1 Chart II-2USD Technicals 2 Recent data from the US have been positive: GDP recovered by 33.1% quarter-on-quarter on an annualized basis in Q3. The Markit Manufacturing PMI marginally increased from 53.2 to 53.3 in October. The services PMI also increased, from 54.6 to 56. The Chicago Fed National Activity Index declined from 1.11 to 0.27 in September. Initial jobless claims increased by 751K for the week ending on October 23rd. The DXY index increased by 1% this week alongside the equity market correction, impacted by the looming US elections and increasing number of COVID-19 cases. Our Geopolitical strategists have upgraded Trump’s odds of winning from 35% to 45%, though major opinion polls still favor a Biden victory. Our bias is that a Biden win will likely increase fiscal stimulus and decrease economic and trade policy uncertainties, which is bearish for the US dollar. Report Links: A Few Market Observations - October 23, 2020 Does The US Save Too Much Or Too Little? - October 16, 2020 Tail Risks In FX Markets - October 2, 2020 The Euro Chart II-3EUR Technicals 1 Chart II-4EUR Technicals 2 Recent data from the euro area have been mixed: The Markit Manufacturing PMI increased from 53.7 to 54.4 in October. However, the Services PMI declined from 48 to 46.2.  M3 money supply surged by 10.4% year-on-year in September. The Economic Sentiment Indicator was unchanged at 90.9 in October. The euro plunged by 1.4% against the US dollar this week. On Thursday, the ECB held its key interest rate unchanged at -0.5% despite re-imposed lockdown measures against surging COVID cases in Europe. However, it also hinted that there could be additional policy action and more stimulus in December should conditions worsen. Report Links: Addressing Client Questions - September 4, 2020 On The DXY Breakout, Euro, And Swiss Franc - February 21, 2020 Updating Our Balance Of Payments Monitor - November 29, 2019 Japanese Yen Chart II-5JPY Technicals 1 Chart II-6JPY Technicals 2 Recent data from Japan have been positive: The Jibun Manufacturing PMI increased from 47.7 to 48 in October. The Coincident Index rose from 78.3 to 79.2 in August. The Leading Economic Index also ticked up from 86.7 to 88.4. Retail trade fell by 8.7% year-on-year in September.  The Japanese yen depreciated by 0.3% against the US dollar this week amid market volatilities. With relatively higher real interest rates, a current account surplus and cheaper valuation, the Japanese yen is our favorite safe-haven currency. We continue to recommend holding the Japanese yen as a portfolio hedge for surfing election and COVID waves. On a separate note, the BoJ kept its interest rate on hold this Thursday. The Bank also weakened its economic forecast for this year but upgraded the economic recovery outlook. Report Links: The Near-Term Bull Case For The Dollar - February 28, 2020 Building A Protector Currency Portfolio - February 7, 2020 Currency Market Signals From Gold, Equities And Flows - January 31, 2020 British Pound Chart II-7GBP Technicals 1 Chart II-8GBP Technicals 2 Recent data from the UK have been mixed: Retail sales increased by 4.7% year-on-year in September. The Markit Manufacturing PMI declined from 54.1 to 53.3 in October. The services PMI fell from 56.1 to 52.3 in October. The British pound plunged by 1.5% against the US dollar this week amid broad USD strength. The latest PMI releases saw a steeper decline in the services industry. As UK’s services account for more than half of total economic output, it suggests that the pound is more exposed to second infection risks than other manufacturing-oriented economies. Report Links: Revisiting Our High-Conviction Trades - September 11, 2020 Updating Our Balance Of Payments Monitor - November 29, 2019 A Few Trade Ideas - Sept. 27, 2019 Australian Dollar Chart II-9AUD Technicals 1 Chart II-10AUD Technicals 2 Recent data from Australia have been positive: Imports fell by 1% month-on-month in September. Exports, however, increased by 3% month-on-month. The trade surplus widened from A$2.6 billion to A$5.1 billion. Headline CPI increased by 0.7% year-on-year in Q3, up from -0.3% the previous quarter. The Australian dollar fell by 1.5% against the US dollar this week. The pickup in inflation eased the RBA’s pressure to further ease monetary policy further. The expansion in the trade account surplus also bodes well for the Australian dollar in a reflationary environment. Report Links: An Update On The Australian Dollar - September 18, 2020 On AUD And CNY - January 17, 2020 Updating Our Balance Of Payments Monitor - November 29, 2019 New Zealand Dollar Chart II-11NZD Technicals 1 Chart II-12NZD Technicals 2 Recent data from New Zealand have been negative:  Exports fell from NZ$4.4 billion to NZ$4 billion in September while imports expanded from NZ$4.7 billion to NZ$5 billion. The trade deficit therefore widened from NZ$282 million to NZ$1,013 million. The ANZ Business Confidence Index rose to -15.7 from -28.5 in October. The New Zealand dollar fell by 1.2% against the US dollar this week. The ANZ Activity Outlook Report said that “there was a mix of ups and downs” in recent developments and warned against higher economic and unemployment risks once the cushioning impact of the wage subsidy fades. Report Links: Currencies And The Value-Versus-Growth Debate - July 10, 2020 Updating Our Balance Of Payments Monitor - November 29, 2019 Place A Limit Sell On DXY At 100 - November 15, 2019 Canadian Dollar Chart II-13CAD Technicals 1 Chart II-14CAD Technicals 2 Recent data from Canada have been positive: Building permits increased by 17% month-on-month in September. The Canadian dollar plunged by 1.7% against the US dollar this week. Crude oil prices dropped by 12% this week amid worries about the second infection wave and prolonged travel restrictions, which represent a headwind for the Canadian dollar. On Wednesday, the Bank of Canada announced that it would keep interest rates on hold at 0.25% and maintain such low policy rates until the inflation objective is achieved. Moreover, the Bank is recalibrating the QE program to shift purchases towards longer-term bonds, which have a more direct influence on the borrowing rates for household and businesses. Report Links: Currencies And The Value-Versus-Growth Debate - July 10, 2020 More On Competitive Devaluations, The CAD And The SEK - May 1, 2020 A New Paradigm For Petrocurrencies - April 10, 2020 Swiss Franc Chart II-15CHF Technicals 1 Chart II-16CHF Technicals 2 Recent data from Switzerland have been negative: The ZEW Expectations Index plunged from 26.2 to 2.3 in October. Total sight deposits increased from CHF 705.1 billion to CHF 706.9 billion for the week ending on October 23rd. While the Swiss franc depreciated by 1% against the US dollar this week, it increased by 0.5% against the euro, which brings it close to our limit buy price of 1.06. An expensive currency is likely to impede growth for a small open economy like Switzerland, suggesting the SNB will step up its currency intervention. Prepare to go long EUR/CHF.  Report Links: On The DXY Breakout, Euro, And Swiss Franc - February 21, 2020 Currency Market Signals From Gold, Equities And Flows - January 31, 2020 Portfolio Tweaks Before The Chinese New Year - January 24, 2020 Norwegian Krone Chart II-17NOK Technicals 1 Chart II-18NOK Technicals 2 Recent data from Norway have been positive: Retail sales increased by 0.3% month-on-month in September. The Norwegian krone plunged by 3.4% against the US dollar this week, making it the worst performing G10 currency. Despite recent market volatilities, we continue to favor the Norwegian krone in the long run based on its cheap valuation and a brighter energy outlook in the post-vaccine world. We are looking to rebuy the Nordic currencies on weakness. Report Links: Revisiting Our High-Conviction Trades - September 11, 2020 A New Paradigm For Petrocurrencies - April 10, 2020 Building A Protector Currency Portfolio - February 7, 2020 Swedish Krona Chart II-19SEK Technicals 1 Chart II-20SEK Technicals 2 Recent data from Sweden have been positive: The trade balance shifted from a deficit of SEK 2.1 billion to a surplus of SEK 2.6 billion in September. Consumer confidence increased from 88.4 to 90 in October. Retail sales increased by 3.9% year-on-year in September. PPI fell by 4.2% year-on-year in September. The Swedish krona decreased by 1.9% against the US dollar this week. While COVID cases have been resurging in Sweden, Sweden’s services is lower, as a % of GDP, than other major euro area countries and therefore less exposed to the risk of a second wave. We continue to recommend the Swedish krona from a cyclical perspective. Kelly Zhong Research Analyst Report Links: Revisiting Our High-Conviction Trades - September 11, 2020 Updating Our Balance Of Payments Monitor - November 29, 2019 Where To Next For The US Dollar? - June 7, 2019 Trades & Forecasts Forecast Summary Core Portfolio Tactical Trades Limit Orders Closed Trades