Economy

Executive Summary No Funding For Property Developers, No Land Sales Beijing’s plan to bring forward RMB 2.6 trillion of financing for infrastructure expenditures in H2 2022 is a considerable stimulus. However, this new funding will not result in new investments. Rather, it will, by and large, offset the drop in local government (LG) revenues from land sales this year. In short, there is little new stimulus for infrastructure beyond what has been approved in the budget plan earlier this year. Not only is the credit and fiscal impulse smaller in this cycle than in the previous ones, but also the multiplier effect will be lower. This will hinder the recovery in domestic demand. After the one-off rebound in economic activity following the lockdowns in April and May of this year, China’s business cycle recovery will be more U shaped rather than V shaped. Bottom Line: For absolute-return investors neither A-shares nor investable stocks offer an attractive risk-reward profile. Within a global equity portfolio, we continue to recommend a neutral allocation to China’s A-shares and an underweight allocation to Chinese investable stocks. Relative to the EM equity benchmark, investors should continue to overweight A-shares and remain neutral on investable stocks. Maintain the long A-shares / short offshore investable Chinese stocks position.   Alleged plans of an additional RMB 1.5 trillion local government (LG) special bond issuance in H2 2022 have prompted investors to speculate about whether this stimulus initiative is sufficient to produce a considerable acceleration in infrastructure investment.  This stimulus would be added to RMB 800 billion and 300 billion of policy bank funding for infrastructure that the government approved earlier in Q2 this year. Hence, the combined new infrastructure financing made available by Beijing is RMB 2.6 trillion. Below, we elaborate on how this RMB 2.6 trillion of additional infrastructure financing will be largely offset by a drop in LG revenues from land sales. In short, the stimulus will preclude downside in infrastructure investment rather than herald a major acceleration.  In addition, the economic recovery still faces substantial headwinds from other segments of the economy. We believe that, approached as a whole, China’s business cycle recovery will be more U shaped than V shaped. Quantifying Infrastructure Stimulus The degree of new financing for infrastructure is considerable. This RMB 2.6 trillion in new financing in H2 2022 is equal to 7% of planned 2022 LG aggregate expenditures, 6% of planned 2022 aggregate total central and local government spending including budgetary and managed funds, 14% of fixed-asset investment (FAI) in traditional infrastructure, and 2% of GDP.  The composition of general government spending is presented in Table 1. Table 1Structure And Composition Of Government Spending In China However, a caveat is in order: this new funding will not result in new investments. Rather, it will, by and large, offset the drop in LG revenues from land sales. The primary source of financing infrastructure investment is LG managed funds. LG managed funds budgets, however, are under severe stress because of the plunge in revenues from land sales. Notably, proceeds from land sales account for 23% of aggregate LG expenditures (Chart 1). Land sales have contracted by about 30% in the January-June period of this year, and there is little hope that they will pick up in H2 2022. The reason is that property developers’ financing is down by 30% and is unlikely to recover soon (Chart 2). Chart 1Land Sales Are Critical For LG Expenditures Chart 2No Funding For Property Developers, No Land Sales Chart 3Property Developers Are Facing Debt Deflation As we have argued in our past reports, property developers carry a substantial inventory of real estate assets funded by a massive debt build-up (Chart 3, top panel). With housing prices beginning to deflate, property developers are about to face debt deflation – falling asset prices and a high debt burden (Chart 3, bottom panel). Thereby, they have little appetite or capacity to expand their assets and leverage. Assuming land sales for the full year will decline by 30%, this drop would lead to an RMB 2.52 trillion reduction in LGs managed fund revenues in 2022 (Table 2). Hence, the new RMB 2.6 trillion infrastructure financing will be used to offset the RMB 2.5 trillion shortfall in LG managed funds budgets because of the plunge in land transfer proceeds. Table 2China: New Stimulus For Infrastructure in H2 2022 On the whole, there will be very little new funding available to boost infrastructure spending beyond what has been approved by the 2022 National People’s Congress (NPC) earlier this year. Chart 4The Credit And Fiscal Impulse Will Be Moderate Hence, for this full year, there is no change to the aggregate fiscal spending impulse that incorporates central and local government budgetary spending as well as managed funds’ expenditures (Chart 4, top panel). The two scenarios for the non-government credit impulse are shown in the middle panel of Chart 4. The optimistic scenario assumes non-government credit will accelerate to 9.5% from 8.7%, and the pessimistic scenario is based on no acceleration in non-government credit growth. Finally, the bottom panel of Chart 4 illustrates the projections for the combined credit and fiscal spending impulse for the remainder of this year. Although the aggregate fiscal and credit impulse is non-trivial, it is smaller than those in 2020, 2016, 2013, and 2009. Bottom Line: The government has announced RMB 1.1 trillion in infrastructure funding and will likely raise the LG special bond quota by RMB 1.5 trillion. Yet, this RMB 2.6 trillion financing will only offset the shortfall in infrastructure financing from plunging land transfer revenue.  In brief, there is little new stimulus for infrastructure beyond what has been approved in the budget plan from early this year.   Economic Headwinds Chart 5China's Reopening Rebound Economic activity in China has rebounded following the reopening of the economy. Chart 5 illustrates that high-frequency data, such as car sales, house sales, commercial truck cargo, and steel production have all recently improved. We expect the one-off renormalization of economic activity following the lockdowns in April and May to give way to more subdued growth. The reason is that the mainland economy is facing several major headwinds: The real estate market is unlikely to recover meaningfully given the “three red lines” policy has not been eased, and many of property market excesses have not been purged. Hence, the question remains whether the Chinese economy can stage a robust recovery without the participation of the property market. We doubt it can because of the vital role that real estate has played in the economy in the past 20 years as the result of its large share in GDP and its impact on consumer and business sentiment. Since 2008, there has been no business cycle recovery in China without the property market firing on all cylinders (Chart 6). Chart 6All Economic Recoveries Were Accompanied By A Revival In The Property Market Chart 7China: The Willingness To Spend And Invest Is Very Low Rolling lockdowns will likely persist. This will weigh on household and private business confidence. Diminishing confidence will undermine the willingness to spend, invest, and hire. Our marginal propensity to spend indicators for households & enterprises remain very depressed (Chart 7). Low propensity to spend entails that the multiplier effect of fiscal and credit stimulus will be lower in this cycle than in the previous ones. Not only is the credit and fiscal impulse smaller than in the previous cycles but also the multiplier will be lower. This will hinder the recovery in domestic demand. Finally, Chinese exports are set to contract in H2 2022 because of shrinking demand for consumer goods (ex-autos) in the US and Europe as well as mainstream EM. Bottom Line: After the one-off rebound in economic activity following the lockdowns in April and May, the business cycle recovery will be more U shaped rather than V shaped. Investment Conclusions For absolute-return investors, neither A-shares nor investable stocks offer an attractive risk-reward profile.   Within the A-share market, our strongest conviction is to overweight interest rate-sensitive sectors like consumer staples, utilities, and healthcare. Consumer discretionary stocks should also be a slight overweight now.   We continue to recommend a neutral allocation to Chinese A-shares and an underweight allocation to investable stocks within a global equity portfolio. Relative to the EM equity benchmark, investors should continue to overweight A-shares and remain neutral on investable Chinese stocks.   Maintain the long A-shares / short offshore investable stocks position.   The yuan, like all other emerging Asian currencies, is still facing near-term downside risk versus the US dollar. Chinese onshore government bond yields will likely drop further.   Arthur Budaghyan Chief Emerging Markets Strategist arthurb@bcaresearch.com Strategic Themes Cyclical Recommendations

Executive Summary Bond investors can’t seem to decide whether the US economy is in the midst of an inflationary boom or hurtling toward recession. Our sense is that, while US economic growth is clearly slowing, we don’t see the unemployment rate rising enough for the Fed to abandon its tightening cycle any time soon. The 5-year US Treasury yield has tightened relative to the rest of the curve in recent weeks, and the 2-year maturity now looks like the most attractive spot for investors. TIPS breakeven inflation rates have also declined markedly in recent weeks, and TIPS no longer look expensive on our models. TIPS Are No Longer Expensive Bottom Line: US bond investors should keep portfolio duration close to benchmark. They should also shift Treasury curve allocations from the 5-year maturity to the 2-year maturity and upgrade TIPS from underweight to neutral. Whipsaw Inflationary boom or recession? US bond investors can’t seem to decide and yields are swinging back and forth depending on the latest economic data. Just in the past month we’ve seen the 10-year US Treasury yield peak at 3.49%, fall to 2.82% and then finally move back above 3% following last week’s strong employment report. Not surprisingly, implied interest rate volatility is the highest it’s been since the Global Financial Crisis (Chart 1). Our sense is that, while US economic growth is clearly slowing, we don’t see the unemployment rate rising enough for the Fed to abandon its tightening cycle any time soon. This is especially true because the Fed will tolerate a significant rise in the unemployment rate as long as inflation stays above target.1 Turning to the evidence, decelerating US economic activity is apparent in the manufacturing and non-manufacturing PMIs, which are both falling rapidly from high levels (Chart 2). Though both indexes remain firmly above the 50 boom/bust line, trends in financial conditions suggest that they could dip below 50 within the next few months. Chart 1A Highly Volatile Rates Market Chart 2US Growth Is Slowing The employment components of both indexes are already in contractionary territory (Chart 2, bottom panel), but this is due to concerns about labor supply, not demand. For example, last week’s ISM non-manufacturing PMI release included three representative quotes from respondents about labor market conditions.2 All three quotes reference concerns about labor supply: Unable to fill positions with qualified applicants. Extremely hard to find truck drivers. Demand for talent is higher, but availability of candidates to fill open roles continues to keep employment levels from increasing. This doesn’t sound like an economy that is on the cusp of surging unemployment, and this is exactly what the Fed is counting on. The Fed’s hope is that slower demand will bring down the large number of job openings without leading to a significant increase in layoffs or a significant rise in the unemployment rate. In that regard, it is notable that job openings ticked down in May, both in absolute terms and relative to the number of unemployed. Meanwhile, the rates of hiring and layoffs held steady (Chart 3). Chart 3Some Hope For A Soft Landing Investment Implications Our investment strategy hinges on two key economic views related to the labor market and inflation. First, while a surge doesn’t seem imminent, slowing economic activity means that the unemployment rate is more likely to edge higher between now and the end of the year than it is to fall. Second, as we’ve written in previous reports, US inflation has a relatively easy path back to its underlying trend of approximately 4%.3 After that, it will be more difficult for policymakers to bring inflation from 4% back down to 2%, and we could see the Fed push rates above 4% next year to accomplish this task. Taken together, these two views suggest that growth will be slowing and inflation falling between now and the end of the year. This combination could easily push bond yields lower, especially if recession worries flare up again. High frequency bond yield indicators such as the CRB Raw Industrials / Gold ratio and the relative performance of cyclical versus defensive equities also suggest that bond yields have room to fall (Chart 4). That said, the market is currently priced for the fed funds rate to peak at 3.74% in May 2023 and to fall back to 3.19% by the end of 2023. We see strong odds that inflation will be sticky enough (and the labor market resilient enough) for the Fed to push rates above those levels next year. This leaves us with an ‘at benchmark’ stance on portfolio duration for the time being, with an inclination to turn more bearish on bonds later this year if our base case forecast pans out. More specifically, we would likely reduce portfolio duration if the 10-year Treasury yield falls back to 2.5% or if inflation reverts to its 4% underlying trend. Conversely, we will turn more bullish on bonds if we see signs in the labor market data that point to a Fed pause (or Fed rate cuts) being necessary. For now, growth in nonfarm employment and aggregate weekly payrolls (wages x hours x employment) suggest we aren’t close to this outcome (Chart 5). Chart 4High-Frequency Bond Yield Indicators Chart 5The US Labor Market Is Strong Sliding Down The Yield Curve Since early April we’ve been recommending that investors position long the 5-year Treasury note and short a duration-matched barbell consisting of the 2-year and 10-year notes to take advantage of a US yield curve that was quite steep out to the 5-year maturity point and quite flat beyond that. That trade is now played out. The 5 over 2/10 butterfly spread has tightened back to zero and the 2-year note is now the most attractively priced security on the US Treasury curve. Chart 6 shows that the spread between the 2-year note and a duration-matched barbell consisting of cash and the 5-year note offers an extraordinary yield advantage of 92 bps. What’s more, Table 1 shows that, with the exception of the unloved 20-year bond, the 2-year note offers the most attractive 12-month carry on the curve, largely a result of the 18 bps of rolldown attributable to the still-steep slope between the 1-year and 2-year maturity points. Chart 6Shift Into 2s Table 112-Month Carry Across The US Treasury Curve This large shift in relative pricing compels us to close our prior position (long 5-year bullet versus 2/10 barbell) and open a new position: long the 2-year note and short a duration-matched cash/5 barbell. This new position (long 2yr over cash/5) offers attractive 12-month carry, but given the current volatile interest rate environment, it should mainly be expected to profit in the event of a steepening of the 2/5 Treasury slope. With that in mind, it’s notable that the 2/5 slope recently inverted. Inversions of the 2/5 slope are historically rare. They tend to occur near the end of Fed tightening cycles and, with the exception of the early-1980s, they tend to not last that long (Chart 7). Chart 72/5 Inversions Are Rare And Fleeting Going forward, we see three plausible scenarios for the 2/5 slope during the next 6-12 months. First, the Fed achieves something close to the soft landing it is aiming for. Inflation starts to fall and the unemployment rate edges higher. However, unemployment never reaches levels that necessitate a complete reversal of Fed tightening. The 2/5 Treasury slope bear-steepens in this scenario as the market discounts that the Fed will have to push rates above 4% to hit its inflation target. Second, a deep recession and complete reversal of Fed tightening occur much more quickly than we anticipate. The 2/5 Treasury slope would bull-steepen in this scenario as the front-end of the curve is pulled down by the Fed’s pivot. Third, inflation shows no signs of reversing course. Long-dated inflation expectations jump and the Fed determines that it has no choice but to follow the example of Paul Volcker and tighten, even if the economy falls into a deep recession. As was the case in the early-1980s, the 2/5 Treasury slope could become deeply inverted in this scenario. Our sense is that the first two scenarios are much more likely than the third. We have written in prior reports about how the current spate of inflation is much different than what was seen in the early 1980s.4  This makes us willing to bet against a prolonged deep inversion of the 2/5 slope. Bottom Line: US Treasury curve investors should exit their positions long the 5-year bullet versus a duration-matched 2/10 barbell. They should initiate a position long the 2-year bullet versus a duration-matched cash/5 barbell. Upgrade US TIPS To Neutral Finally, we note that TIPS breakeven inflation rates have declined markedly during the past month. The 10-year TIPS breakeven inflation rate is currently 2.38%, near the lower-end of the Fed’s 2.3%-2.5% target range, and the 5-year/5-year forward TIPS breakeven inflation rate is a mere 2.12%, well below target (Chart 8). We also note that the 5-year/5-year forward TIPS breakeven inflation rate is back below survey estimates of what inflation will be 5-10 years in the future (Chart 8, bottom panel). Chart 8TIPS Breakevens We have been recommending an underweight position in TIPS versus nominal US Treasuries since early April, but the recent valuation shift means it’s time to add some exposure. Critically, our TIPS Breakeven Valuation Indicator has also increased to +0.6, moving into “TIPS cheap” territory (Chart 9). Historically, the 10-year TIPS breakeven inflation rate has averaged an increase of 28 bps in the 12 months following a reading between +0.5 and +1.0 from our Indicator (Table 2). Chart 9TIPS Are No Longer Expensive Table 2TIPS Breakeven Valuation Indicator Track Record The drop in TIPS breakeven inflation rates has been most prominent at the front-end of the curve. The 2-year TIPS breakeven inflation rate is down to 3.22% from a peak of 4.93%. The high correlation between short-maturity TIPS breakevens and realized CPI inflation means that short-dated breakevens can fall further as inflation continues to trend down, but already we see that 3.22% looks like a much more reasonable estimate of average inflation for the next two years than did the 4.93% peak. While we advise investors to upgrade TIPS from underweight to neutral relative to nominal US Treasuries, we continue to recommend an outright short position in 2-year TIPS. The 2-year TIPS yield has risen sharply since its 2021 low (Chart 10), but recent comments from Fed officials imply that the Fed would like to see positive real yields across the entire curve before it declares monetary policy sufficiently restrictive.5 This means that there is still some room for the 2-year TIPS yield to increase, from its current level of -0.10% back into positive territory. Such a move should also lead to more flattening of the 2/10 TIPS curve, and we continue to recommend holding that position as well (Chart 10, bottom panel). Chart 10Stay Short 2-Year TIPS Bottom Line: Investors should upgrade TIPS from underweight to neutral relative to nominal US Treasuries but maintain outright short positions in 2-year TIPS. 2/10 TIPS curve flatteners and 2/10 inflation curve steepeners also continue to make sense. Ryan Swift US Bond Strategist rswift@bcaresearch.com Footnotes 1 For more details on how to think about the tradeoff between the Fed’s inflation and employment goals please see US Bond Strategy Weekly Report, “When The Dual Mandates Clash”, dated June 28, 2022. 2 https://www.ismworld.org/supply-management-news-and-reports/reports/ism-report-on-business/services/june/ 3 Please see US Bond Strategy / Global Fixed Income Strategy Weekly Report, “No End In Sight For Fed Tightening”, dated June 21, 2022. 4 Please see US Bond Strategy Weekly Report, “No Relief From High Inflation”, dated June 14, 2022. 5 Please see US Bond Strategy Weekly Report, “When The Dual Mandates Clash”, dated June 28, 2022. Recommended Portfolio Specification Other Recommendations Treasury Index Returns Spread Product Returns