Economy

Special Report

Executive Summary China’s Property Market: Signs Of Improvement? The slump in China’s property market is nearing its cyclical end. The accelerated policy easing in the housing sector should lift the sector out of deep contraction and put it on its recovery path in the second half of this year. Policy easing had supported a quick and strong recovery in Chinese property demand during 2H2020, following the first COVID wave to hit China.  This time, however, with the “three red lines” policy still in place and depressed household income growth, we expect only a moderate year-on-year growth (4-6%) in property sales during 2H2022. Chinese construction activity will also revive slightly, based on a mild recovery in project completions in 2H2022. Chinese property developers’ stocks could still have some downside in absolute terms before the pandemic situation in China stabilizes. Bottom Line: Chinese real estate market is still facing downside risks in the near term. However, accelerated policy easing from both the central government and local governments may result in a moderate recovery in Chinese property market in 2H2022. Feature Chart 1China Property Sector Woes China’s aggressive housing-sector deleveraging campaign since late 2020 has triggered turmoil in the country’s property market, while this year’s COVID-induced lockdowns have exacerbated the slump. Property sales, starts, completions as well as home prices are all in deep contraction (Chart 1).  Is a demand recovery on the way and how strong will it be? Compared with the 2020 episode, we believe that this time it will take longer to restore homebuyer confidence and the strength of the recovery will be considerably weaker. In 2H2020, to stimulate a pandemic-hit domestic property market, the Chinese authorities announced a set of supportive policies to encourage housing demand as well as to help domestic home developers overcome their extreme funding shortages. This led to an 11% year-on-year (YOY) growth in property sales during 2H2020. Although this year housing-sector policies have loosened more than they did in 1H2020, demand for housing has been sluggish and real estate developers’ propensity to take on more leverage and to invest has fallen to a multi-year low. The “three red lines” policy applied to property developers as well as the lending constraints imposed on banks remain in place. Furthermore, China’s zero-COVID policy will likely lead to rolling lockdowns and frequent disruptions to the economy, depressing household income growth, which has fallen over the past two years. Hence, assuming that the COVID-induced full lockdowns in China’s large cities are lifted before the end of May (COVID cases in China have gradually come down in the past couple of weeks), we expect only a moderate pickup in home sales in the second half of this year – about 4-6% YOY growth –about half of that in 2H2020. In terms of China’s housing-related construction activity, we believe it will only recover slightly in 2H2022, in line with our projection of a modest rebound in home completion. Chart 2China’s Housing Demand: Structural Headwinds As we discussed in previous reports, China’s housing demand is facing major structural headwinds, as demand for properties in China has already entered a saturation phase and the country’s working-age population (15-64 years of age) is shrinking (Chart 2). Despite short-term measures to stabilize the property market, China’s top leadership will likely stick to their overarching “housing is for living not for speculation” policy mantra and continue to make efforts to reduce the housing sector’s share in the economy. As such, our longer-term view on the Chinese property market remains negative. A Mild Recovery In Home Sales Chart 3The Recovery of Chinese Property Market Relies On Home Sales Home sales, which contributed to at least 50% of Chinese property developers’ funding, hold the key to the recovery of the Chinese property market (Chart 3). The core of the ongoing crisis in China’s housing market is Chinese property developers’ increasingly constrained financing due to rapidly falling home sales as well as stringent deleveraging policies. We expect a 4-6% annual growth in Chinese property sales (i.e. floor space sold in square meters) in the second half of this year. While this is a significant improvement from the 15% contraction in the past two quarters, the projected rebound will be much more muted than the 11% growth in 2H2020 and the 23% rebound in the 2016 housing-market recovery. In 2020, Chinese property sales tanked 40% YOY during January-February. After a flurry of supportive policiestook effect in March-April, the growth in home sales on a YOY basis turned positive in May 2020 and jumped to 11%YOY for the period of July-December 2020. Chart 4Slowing Household Disposable Income While we think an acceleration in housing-market stimulus1 may be able to spur some rebound in demand for housing in the second half of this year, notably, economic fundamentals and household sentiment have both turned much less favorable this year than in 2020. COVID-related restrictions have exacerbated matters and have weighed heavily on the demand for housing. The growth rate of national disposable income per capita slowed by more than two percentage points (in nominal terms) in Q1 this year from the pre-pandemic era (Chart 4). Moreover, the PBoC’s quarterly urban depositor survey in Q1 showed subdued confidence in future household income (Chart 5). Household willingness to save also hit a record high and this sentiment is even more elevated than it was in early 2020; on the other hand, the propensity to invest has dropped to a multi-year low (Chart 6). Chart 5Subdued Confidence In Future Household ##br##Income Chart 6More Chinese Households Intend To Save Rather Than Invest There are some early signs that demand for housing, including pent-up demand that has been curbed by the ongoing COVID-induced full and partial lockdowns in China’s major cities, may see some modest rebound in 2H2022: Chart 7Banks Can Moderately Loosen Up Their Lending To The Property Sector First, banks may be slowly increasing their lending to the real estate sector while complying with the real estate loan concentration management regulations (Chart 7). Second, household willingness to buy homes, although still significantly lower than a year ago, is improving somewhat. According to the Survey And Research Center For China Household Finance, the proportion of households planning to buy a house has been increasing, albeit moderately for two consecutive quarters (Chart 8). Third, we expect local governments to roll out more aggressive measures to stimulate housing demand. Land sales account for the lion’s share of the local government’s revenue but the developers’ land purchase has contracted (Chart 9). Against this backdrop, local governments will likely accelerate the implementation of supportive policies. Chart 8More Households Plan To Buy A House Chart 9Local Governments Will Likely Push For More Supportive Policies To Boost Land Sales Bottom Line: Property sales are likely to grow by 4-6%YOY during 2H2022. Will Developers’ Funding Conditions Improve? Real estate developers’ funding conditions are likely to improve modestly in the rest of 2022 , mainly due to improved property sales, from what was an extremely dire situation in 2H21 (Chart 3 on page 4). Property development is an asset-heavy and capital-intensive business, and the government-led deleveraging mandate and depressed home sales have massively curtailed cash flows to homebuilders. Chart 10Chinese Real Estate Investment: A Breakdown Of Funding Source Chinese homebuilders generally have several ways to finance themselves. Chart 10 shows a breakdown of the source of Chinese real estate investment funding, with 12% of the total funding from domestic and foreign loans, 33% from a self-raised fund through bond and equity issuances, or retained earnings, 37% from deposits and advanced payments (e.g., down payments), and 16% from homebuyers’ mortgages in 2021. Other than some modest rebound in home sales, property developers’ alternative cash flows – which account for the other 50% of their funding – will remain under constraint for the following reasons: Regulations on leveraging among property developers have not loosened much. The “three red line" policy, implemented in July 2020, has limited Chinese property developers’ borrowing capacity and has so far remained firmly in place. Under this policy, homebuilders who breach none of the three red lines can only increase their interest-bearing borrowing by 15% at most, while failing to meet all three “red lines” may result in them being cut off from access to new loans from banks. The lending ceilings imposed on banks − the real estate loan concentration management system– which came into effect on 1 January 2021, also remain in place. Due to these stringent rules, Chart 11 shows the year-on-year growth of loans to real estate developers had dropped to zero in Q3 2021 from the 25% growth in Q3 2018. As these rules are critical to containing the high leverage of the Chinese property market from evolving into a systemic risk, the Chinese authorities are unlikely to radically change them (Chart 12). Chart 11More Loans To Property Developers, Albeit Capped By A Lending Ceiling Chart 12Chinese Homebuilders’ Leverage Is Still High Chart 13The Increase In Self-raising Funds Will Be Limited This Yea Self-raised funds through bond and equity issuance also account for a large share of the Chinese real estate investment funding source. The recent riot in China’s stock market and the crisis in the offshore corporate bond market made such methods of raising fund less favorable. Indeed, self-raised funds have been in contraction since last September when the Evergrande default shocked investors (Chart 13). We do not see a sizeable increase in self-raised funds this year. Bottom Line: Developers’ funding conditions are likely to improve only moderately in 2H2022 as property sales see a mild rebound. The other sources of funding will continue to be constrained by the deleveraging policy.   What About Housing-Related Construction Activity? China’s housing-related construction activity will revive slightly in 2H2022. Property developers may accelerate completion of their existing projects, while the deep contraction in housing starts will likely narrow in 2H22. Chart 14Homebuilders Need To Deliver Their Unfinished Projects In recent years, Chinese real estate developers have raised funds by selling more newly started buildings instead of completed properties. This resulted in a divergence between property sales and completions, suggesting that there is a considerable inventory of pre-sold but unfinished projects (Chart 14). With more funding available, mainly from property sales, and to a lesser extent from bank lending, property developers will likely speed up the construction of those pre-sold but unfinished buildings. We expect property completions to grow 2-4% YOY in 2H2022, based on the following observations: The authorities repeatedly emphasized that property developers should meet their obligations by finishing and delivering their pre-sold but unfinished properties on time. They also have fine-tuned policies to support building completions by developers. New policies announced in February 2022 stated that property developers must prioritize those properties from which they have received pre-sale funds such as down payments. Meanwhile, odds are that the growth rate of property starts will stop falling in 2H2022. However, it will remain in contraction. Once property developers have some financing from property sales, they will tend to purchase land and start construction of new properties in order to generate revenue from presold properties. However, with deleveraging polices still in place, homebuilders can only increase their property starts to some extent. Some early signs of bottoming in land sales may be emerging (Chart 15). The uptick in land sales, although very small, may suggest that the deep contraction in the indicator has come to an end. Since late last year, state-owned property developers have been the main land buyers as private property developers were in a severe shortage of financing. This year, improving home sales and increasing bank lending may allow these private developers to return to the land acquisition market. Land sale transactions are highly correlated with housing starts (Chart 16). The improvement in land sales, if sustained into the coming months, suggests housing starts will improve somewhat in 2H2022.  Chart 15Land Sales May Be Bottoming Chart 16Land Sales Are Highly Correlated With Housing Starts Chart 17Housing-related Construction Activity Will Likely Revive Moderately In 2H2022 Bottom Line: Housing-related construction activity will likely revive moderately on a mild recovery in project completions (Chart 17). Investment Implications Given the negative forces from rolling lockdowns and low homebuyer confidence in the property market, property developers’ stocks (both investable and A-share) could have more downside in the near term (Chart 18). In relative terms, property developers’ stocks (both investable and A-share) have outperformed their respective benchmarks (Chart 19). We are doubtful that this outperformance in property developers’ stocks will develop into a cyclical or structural bull markert since our overall outlook for the real estate sector remains downbeat beyond next 6-9 months. Chart 18Chinese Property Developers’ Stocks: No Bottom Yet Both In Absolute Terms… Chart 19…And Relative To Benchmarks Chart 20Neutral On Prices Of Construction-related Commodities For Now Commodity prices have already been rising significantly across the board. Even though we expect a slight pickup in China’s real estate construction activity in the remainder of this year, the improvement will be only marginally positive for the country’s demand for construction-related commodities. As such, our view on the price of construction-related commodities (steel, cement, and glass) in the rest of 2022 remains neutral (Chart 20). Ellen JingYuan He Associate Vice President ellenj@bcaresearch.com   Footnotes 1     By April 29, nearly 100 cities had rolled out favorable policies such as lowering down payment ratio, relaxing curbs on home purchases or offering subsidies or even giving out cash to homebuyers. In addition, banks in more than 100 cities have cut mortgage rates ranging between 20 basis points and 60 basis points. Strategic Themes Cyclical Recommendations

Special Report

Executive Summary Biden’s Support Among Women Investors should assume that the Supreme Court will overturn Roe v. Wade even though the odds are probably overrated. A mere modification of Roe will not have any significant macro impact. Overturning Roe will increase US political risk and policy uncertainty in the short term, as midterm election politics will go nuclear. Democrats could mitigate their midterm losses and potentially keep de facto control of the Senate. However, inflation and the economy will probably have a bigger impact on voters, so congressional gridlock remains the likeliest midterm result. Fiscal policy will freeze from 2023-25, which is marginally positive for equities in an inflationary or stagflationary environment. Illegalizing abortion in roughly half of the US states would increase the birth rate but the overall effect would likely be marginal as it would be mitigated by various factors. Recommendation  Initiation Date Return Tactically go long US 10-year Treasuries relative to duration-matched TIPS. 2022-05-11   Bottom Line: Tactically stay cautious and defensive. Go long US 10-year Treasury versus TIPS.   Chart 1Policy Uncertainty Remains Elevated The S&P 500 is down 17% year-to-date while the NASDAQ is down 27%. Our Global Investment Strategy is turning bullish on equities after the recent selloff, bringing its tactical view in line with its cyclical view. Have financial markets priced the bad news? Is a sustainable rally at hand?  We maintain our tactically cautious posture for now but we are cognizant of the potential for a market bounce or even a more sustained rally. We are staying long the US dollar and long defensive sectors relative to cyclicals until we see a clear path for de-escalation in global and US policy uncertainty (Chart 1).   Geopolitical risks are still high and rising, with immediate concerns centering on EU-Russia energy cutoff and NATO enlargement. While China is stimulating its economy, its efforts so far are mixed – import volumes are growing at 2.7% annualized rate. Related Report  US Political StrategyStill At Peak Polarization The US remains politically divided – which results in a more contentious election at home and a more aggressive foreign policy  abroad. Our “Peak Polarization” theme is becoming relevant again in the form of populist pressure on the Supreme Court. The controversy over abortion is likely to drive US political risk and policy uncertainty higher this year and sustain election-year risk-aversion among investors. Overturning Roe Adds To Election Uncertainty The latest controversy over abortion could affect US policy primarily by affecting the midterm elections on November 8. The outcome either way is congressional gridlock, which is marginally positive in an inflationary environment since it freezes fiscal expansion. But the election will keep policy uncertainty high through November.    First let us look at the controversy itself. An unprecedented leak of a draft Supreme Court opinion by Justice Samuel Alito suggests that a five-seat Supreme Court majority has taken shape to overturn the 1973 case Roe v. Wade, which effectively legalized abortion for all states.1 Chief Justice John Roberts confirmed the authenticity of the draft. The final decision in the current case, Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, is due in June or July. Investors should interpret social controversies, if at all, from the perspective of power politics rather than getting wrapped up in endless ideological debates. The fact is that a conservative majority on the court is capable of overturning Roe (Diagram 1). Therefore investors should plan on it being overturned. This is true even though the odds are probably overstated relative to a mere modification of Roe. Diagram 1Conservative Majority Implies Roe V. Wade Will Be Overturned The legality of abortion stems from a 7-2 Supreme Court ruling in 1973, which means that an opposite ruling in 2022 can revoke that precedent. The high court has overturned longstanding precedents in the past. If Roe is overturned, abortion will remain legal in about 25 states. The parameters of its legality will shift to the legislative branch and political process, i.e. the US Congress and state congresses. An estimated 31 million women of child-bearing age live in states that might ban abortion if Roe is overturned.    The decision could still change: It was only a draft opinion that leaked, which shows that the final decision could still change. The court has narrowed the scope of Roe v. Wade before without overturning it entirely, such as in the 1989 Webster v. Reproductive Health Services case and the 1992 Planned Parenthood v. Casey ruling, which relied on stare decisis, i.e. upholding precedent.   The court is not forced to uphold the draft opinion merely because public pressure is rising. While the court’s credibility will suffer if it caves to public opinion, it will also suffer if it diverges too far from public opinion. The reality is that the public remains divided after 49 years (49% pro-choice, 47% pro-life according to Gallup in 2021). This is unlike other major social controversies where the Supreme Court decision settled the debate in public opinion.2 However, Chief Justice Roberts will not cast the deciding vote. Roberts has tried to avoid the appearance of a partisan court and has sided with liberal-leaning justices on notable occasions.3 Regardless, the conservatives hold a 5-4 conservative majority without Roberts. Bottom Line: Investors should assume Roe will be overturned even if the odds are overstated. US social unrest and political instability will revive this year, driving up election uncertainty and hence overall policy uncertainty.  Major Court Rulings Do Not Help Presidents If Roe is overturned then it will mobilize women, Democrats, and independents to go to the voting booth in the midterm elections. About 59% of independents (even a third of Republicans) support abortion as a right, so states and districts that are leaning in favor of Republicans this year will grow more competitive.4Odds that Republicans will win both chambers of Congress (currently 74% on Predictit.org) will be reduced. Having said that, the president’s job approval rating and partisan popular support are the most important factors in determining midterm election results. Controversial Supreme Court decisions do not have a predictable relationship with these variables. Looking at six of the most controversial decisions since World War II, the president’s net approval rating has not reliably responded to whether his ideological camp benefitted from a major court decision:     Brown vs Board of Education, May 1954: The court ruled unanimously to desegregate the nation’s schools. President Eisenhower had appointed Chief Justice Earl Warren, supported desegregation, and saw his approval rating rise in the summer (Chart 2A, first panel). But there had been a recession in 1953-54 and Republicans lost 18 seats in the House and two seats in the Senate. A favorable court case did not help the president’s party in the midterm, while a recession hurt it.  Engel vs Vitale, June 1962: The court ruled 7-1 against prayer in schools. President Kennedy supported the court’s ruling. The court case was overwhelmed by the Cuban Missile Crisis that fall. His approval rating recovered (Chart 2A, second panel). Democrats lost only four House seats and gained four Senate seats, one of the best midterm elections for the president’s party. A favorable court case did not help the president’s party in the midterm, though a foreign policy crisis did.   Loving vs Virginia, June 1967: The court ruled unanimously to allow interracial marriage. President Johnson supported civil rights and appointed the first black Chief Justice Thurgood Marshall to the court the same summer. His approval rating rose afterwards but then fell (Chart 2A, third panel). Johnson did not contend for the presidency in 1968 and Democrats lost it. A favorable court case did not help the president’s party in the presidential elections a year later. US vs Nixon, July 1974: The court ruled unanimously that President Nixon must hand over audio tapes and other evidence to a federal district court. Nixon resigned 15 days later and his approval rating collapsed (though Vice President Gerald Ford’s spiked upon taking office) (Chart 2A, fourth panel). Unsurprisingly Republicans suffered a shellacking in the midterm, losing 49 seats in the House and four seats in the Senate. An unfavorable court case hurt the president’s party in the midterm, though the president was the respondent in the case, which makes it uniquely negative for his party.  Chart 2APresidential Net Approval And Key Supreme Court Decisions​​​​​ Chart 2BPresidential Net Approval And Key Supreme Court Decisions​​​​​ ​​​​​Planned Parenthood vs Casey, June 1992: The court ruled 5-4 to uphold Roe v. Wade and require that states not put an “undue burden” on women seeking abortion. President Bush’s approval rating suffered from the 1990-91 recession (Chart 2B, first panel). Democrats won the presidential election in November. An unfavorable court case did not help the president’s party in the presidential election later that year.  NFIB vs Sebelius, June 2012: The court ruled 5-4 that Congress could use its taxing and spending powers to impose an “individual mandate” requiring individuals to buy health insurance. President Obama’s signature legislation, the Affordable Care Act, thus survived. Obama’s popularity recovered in time for him to be re-elected that year (Chart 2B, second panel). A favorable court case did not hurt the president’s party in the presidential election later that year, though the president’s legacy was uniquely implicated. Obergefell vs Hodges, June 2015: The court ruled 5-4 that the Fourteenth Amendment requires the recognition of same-sex marriage. The economy weakened that year and President Obama’s net approval ultimately fell ahead of the 2016 election (Chart 2B, third panel). A favorable court case did not help the president’s party in the presidential election the following year. Chart 3Generic Congressional Ballot And Key Supreme Court Decisions In short, the president’s party tends to suffer in midterm elections even if a major Supreme Court decision reinforces his policy (1954, 1962). Favorable court rulings may help in immediate presidential elections (2012) while unfavorable court rulings may hurt in an immediate presidential election (1992). The implication for the Democrats in 2022 is that the court’s ruling will not exert a decisive impact on the election. An unfavorable ruling will help but maybe not by much given the stagflationary economic context. Biden’s disapproval rating on the economy is 57% as we go to press. Nor is there a clear relationship between major court decisions and the generic congressional ballot, which measures popular support for the two parties. Democrats kept their lead when Nixon lost a major court case; they lost their lead when Obama won major court cases (Chart 3). Most likely, Roe’s demise would favor Democrats relative to Republicans in the generic ballot, but it may not be decisive amid a weak economy – and Democrats would have to take a commanding lead to overwhelm the traditional midterm disadvantage for the president’s party.  Bottom Line: The most controversial court cases only directly help or hurt the president’s party if it is uniquely implicated, as in 1974 and 2012. Otherwise a favorable court case will not help much, while an unfavorable case could help or hurt. In today’s context, if Roe is overturned it will help the Democrats, but history suggests the health of the economy will outweigh social wedge issues. The Senate Hangs In The Balance Leaving aside history, President Biden’s approval among women will rise if the court overturns Roe, as he will campaign aggressively as the champion of women’s issues. But the latest polling suggests that Republican women may also be energized by the abortion controversy, again suggesting the impact may not be decisive (Chart 4). Historically the critical feature of midterm elections is low voter turnout, skewed toward voters in the political opposition who want to impose a check on the president’s party. Midterm voters also tend to be more educated, more elderly, and more ethnically white. The bar to changing this traditional pattern is very high. But anything that energizes a broader electorate could mitigate the president’s party’s losses. Hence if Roe is overturned, Democratic mobilization and turnout will increase and their midterm performance will improve on the margin.  However, Democratic enthusiasm would improve from a very low level relative to Republican enthusiasm (Chart 5). Again, the opposition’s motivation and the poor economy will be hard for Democrats to overcome. And if the Supreme Court merely modifies Roe v. Wade, the boost to enthusiasm will be small.  Chart 4Biden’s Support Among Women​​​​​ Chart 5Partisan Enthusiasm Gap In 2022 ​​​​​​ Chart 6Swing States: Majority Supports Abortion (Barely) Taking all these points together, if Roe is overturned, Republicans will still be favored in the House of Representatives but will face a tougher battle in the Senate: Our quantitative Senate election model flags Nevada, Arizona, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, and Georgia as the critical swing states in this year’s Senate election (Appendix). Arizona and Pennsylvania are the toss-up states where the probability of Democratic victory is just over 45%. A look at public support for abortion’s legality “in all or most cases” shows that support is (just) over 50% in the key states, though it is under 50% in Georgia  (Chart 6, top panel). Moreover when it comes to voters over the age of 65 – who are more likely to vote in a midterm election – support for abortion is less robust. It is barely over 50% in Arizona and right at 50% in North Carolina. It is under 50% in Pennsylvania and just over 40% in Georgia (Chart 6, second panel). In other words, only if Roe is overturned will the younger cohort of voters in favor of abortion come into play. Support for abortion is also closer to 50/50 in swing states when looking only at white voters (Chart 6, third panel). Again, if Roe is overturned then minority voter turnout may increase but probably not if it is merely curtailed. If Democrats hang onto Arizona and Georgia, they will retain de facto majority control of the Senate. It is possible that they could even gain a seat, say in Pennsylvania. But minority support for abortion in Georgia shows how hard this will be to do. What action can the Democrat-led Congress take on this issue prior to the midterm? Not much. It is highly unlikely that Democrats will be able to pack the Supreme Court, i.e. add new justices to tip the majority in their favor. They will fall short of the 51 votes needed to overrule the Senate filibuster for that purpose. Senator Joe Manchin of West Virginia has ruled it out (and in his state a majority opposes abortion). While a few Republican swing senators could vote for a federal bill to legalize abortion, they would risk losing their seats if they agreed to stack the court in favor of Democrats. Democrats could pass a federal law legalizing abortion but the Senate would have to override the filibuster, which means Republicans could do the same to illegalize abortion when they control the Senate as early as next year. Democrats could replace Manchin with a Republican swing senator. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska would probably have the support of a majority of Alaskans but she would lose her conservative voter base in the August 16 primary election and the general election. Senator Susan Collins of Maine would be more likely to defect from Republican ranks, as she is not up for election in 2022 and Maine shows strong support for abortion. Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona has ruled out overriding the filibuster but she does not face re-election this year and could make an exception on abortion given majority support in Arizona. In that case Collins (and Vice President Harris) would deliver Democrats the decisive vote. However, to gain Collins’s vote, Democrats would have to produce a simple bill that does not contain any poison pills – which is not the case at present. Thus a new federal law is possible but not likely before the election. If it occurred, then Republicans would be more motivated in the midterm elections and the odds of a Republican sweep would rise again. Thus overriding the fililbuster could backfire on Democrats immediately. Bottom Line: If the Supreme Court overturns Roe, Republicans will still be favored to win the House of Representatives, ensuring that Congress becomes gridlocked. The Senate, however, could remain in Democratic hands if Roe is overturned and women voters are fully mobilized. Does Abortion Have A Macro Impact? A divided Congress would generate more uncertainty and market volatility in 2023-24 relative to the scenario in which Republicans win all of Congress and are thus forced to pass laws and compromise with President Biden in 2023-24. President Biden will be less likely to compromise if Democrats retain the Senate, while Republicans will be more obstructionist and willing to engineer crises such as over the federal debt limit, which expires in early 2023. Either way the macro policy implication is that fiscal policy will freeze after Congress’s lame duck session at the end of this year until at least 2025. Chart 7US Fertility Rate And Labor Force Growth Since 1950 Investors will be able to count on a static fiscal outlook and will not have to worry about an additional spending splurge adding to inflationary pressures. As such, in late 2022 and early 2023, gridlock and a post-election reduction in uncertainty will be marginally positive for equities.    What is the longer-term macroeconomic implication if Roe is overturned? A marginal increase in the birth rate of some states is possible. The slowdown in US fertility and birth rates accelerated in the early 1970s resulting from broad socioeconomic change and the federal legalization of abortion. Almost all societies see fertility rates fall with higher incomes and education. US birth rates peaked in the late 1950s and early 1960s for all ages of women. Birth and fertility rates briefly started to rise again before hitting a local peak in 1970, while labor force growth peaked in 1978 (Chart 7). These peaks can be attributed to several factors including abortion. Eleven states had loosened restrictions on abortion by 1970, including New York and California. According to the most authoritative academic study of the subject, states that legalized abortion prior to Roe saw a 4% drop in fertility relative to states that maintained restrictions, while the overall drop in births as measured between states that had access and distant states that did not was 11%.5  The implication is that, if Roe is overturned, the birth rate will increase at least marginally in states that impose substantial restrictions. About 31 million women of child-bearing age live in states that could entirely ban abortion, which is 48% of all US women in this age group. A roughly 4% increase in fertility among this large of a group would be substantial. However, abortions will still be legally available in neighboring states, and studies suggest that travel across states will have a significant impact, implying less of a fertility increase than might be expected.6    US births and fertility continue to decline even as abortion rates fall sharply. Pregnancy rates for women under age 25 have collapsed since 1990 while they have been flat-to-down for women over 25. Since the Great Recession, the US birth rate has broken down from the fairly stable trend of around 70 births per 1,000 women aged 15-44 and fallen to around 58 births per 1,000 women. Covid-19 caused a further drop in fertility. Yet abortion rates have fallen from a peak of 30 per 1,000 child-bearing-aged women in 1980 to about one-third that level today (Chart 8). Both abortion rates and birth rates have collapsed for teenagers and they have fallen for other cohorts. In other words, illegalizing abortion will not affect the overall trend of falling fertility.7  Chart 8Births And Abortions In Downtrend There are a range of other macroeconomic effects that could follow from Roe being overturned, such as reduced female higher education and labor force participation in states that ban abortion outright, though these would also be marginal. Bottom Line: Overturning Roe would amplify political risk and policy uncertainty but gridlock will freeze fiscal policy in 2023-25, which is marginally positive in an inflationary environment. There would likely be a small increase in birth rates in states that restrict abortion but abortion rates have long been falling, while total fertility is falling for other reasons.    Investment Takeaways Investors should stay defensive in the near term, at least until US relations with Russia reach some kind of precarious equilibrium. That cannot happen in the context of NATO enlargement and EU-Russia energy cutoff. The US midterm election is another source of political risk and policy uncertainty both at home and abroad. The Biden administration’s reactive foreign policy threatens a larger confrontation with Russia and as such presents a headwind to global equities. Meanwhile US policy uncertainty, already rising due to monetary and fiscal policy normalization, will increase as a result of the abortion controversy. Overturning Roe would reinforce our “Peak Polarization” thesis, which holds that today’s historic peak in political polarization will remain elevated in the short run but subside over the long run. If the court overrules Roe, polarization will spike but then states will choose their own abortion laws over the long run, reducing activism and extremism on both sides. Of course, if Democrats break the filibuster to legalize abortion, and Republicans do the same to illegalize it, polarization will skyrocket and our expectation that polarization will subside will be delayed for years. Investors should expect shocking and negative surprise events in US politics ahead of the midterms. The country remains a sociopolitical powder keg and abortion and other controversies will add sparks. There have already been protests at the homes of Supreme Court justices Amy Coney Barret and Brett Kavanaugh, which highlights the security risk to their persons. An anti-abortion group’s headquarters was burned down in Wisconsin.8 More broadly, incidents of domestic terrorism from either ideological extreme are likely as long as polarization remains near peak levels. Tactically go long US Treasuries relative to TIPS. Long-dated Treasuries are at fair value according to our US Bond Strategy, while inflation is reaching a near-term peak. Matt Gertken Senior Vice President Chief US Political Strategist mattg@bcaresearch.com   Footnotes 1     Josh Gerstein and Alexander Ward, “Supreme Court has voted to overturn abortion rights, draft opinion shows,” Politico, May 2-3, 2022, politico.com. 2     See Bill Schneider, “Despite everything, Americans’ opinion on abortion hasn’t changed in 50 years,” The Hill, December 12, 2021, thehill.com. 3    Nobody knows what Roberts will decide: he famously changed his deciding vote on President Obama’s Affordable Care Act the night before the final ruling. But in this case Roberts could side with the conservatives, if he knows they will retain their majority anyway, so as to deliver a stronger 6-3 majority and hence avoid the danger to the court of a decision that is seen as narrowly partisan. Left-leaning voters would still see it as a partisan ruling but the focus of national discussion would shift to the legislative branch more rapidly if the court ruling were more decisive. 4    See Kyle Kondik, Larry Schack, and Mick McWilliams, “How Abortion Might Motivate or Persuade Voters in the Midterms,” Sabato’s Crystal Ball, May 5, 2022, centerforpolitics.org. 5    See Phillip Levine et al, “Roe V. Wade and American Fertility,” American Journal of Public Health 89:1 (1999), 199-203. Available at ajph.aphapublications.org. These findings are consistent with historical studies showing that abortion restrictions led to a 4%-12% increase in births in nineteenth-century America. See Johanna Lahey, “Birthing A Nation: The Effect of Fertility Control Access on the 19th Century Demographic Transition,” National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 18717, January 2013, nber.org.   6    See Phillip Levine, “The Impact of Roe v. Wade on American Fertility (UPDATED),” Econofact, May 17, 2021, econofact.org, and the same author in footnote 4 above. 7     See Isaac Maddow-Zimet and Kathryn Kost, “Pregnancies, Births and Abortions in the United States, 1973–2017: National and State Trends by Age,” Guttmacher Institute, March 2021, guttmacher.org. See also Amanda Barroso, “With a potential ‘baby bust’ on the horizon, key facts about fertility in the U.S. before the pandemic,” May 7, 2021, and Anna Brown, “Growing share of childless adults in U.S. don’t expect to ever have children,” November 19, 2021, Pew Research, pewresearch.com. 8    See Betsy Woodruff Swan, “Law enforcement officials brace for potential violence around SCOTUS draft opinion,” Politico, May 5, 2022, politico.com. For the Wisconsin incident, see Stephanie Fryer, “Madison police chief responds to arson investigation on city's north side,” City of Madison, May 8, 2022, cityofmadison.com. Strategic View Open Tactical Positions (0-6 Months) Open Cyclical Recommendations (6-18 Months)   Table A2Political Risk Matrix Table A3US Political Capital Index Chart A1Presidential Election Model Chart A2Senate Election Model Table A4APolitical Capital: White House And Congress Table A4BPolitical Capital: Household And Business Sentiment Table A4CPolitical Capital: The Economy And Markets  

Executive Summary The Fed, Bank of England (BoE) and Reserve Bank of Australia all hiked rates last week. The BoE, however, signaled a note of caution on future UK growth, given soaring energy prices and plunging consumer and business confidence.  Interest rate markets are pricing in a peak in UK policy rates over the next year near 2.5%, above realistic estimates of neutral that are more in the 1.5-2% range. UK productivity and potential growth remain too weak to support a higher neutral rate than that. With the BoE forecasting near recessionary conditions over the next couple of years if those market-implied rate hikes come to fruition, the time is right to increase exposure to UK government bonds in global fixed income portfolios. UK Rate Expectations Are Too High Bottom Line: Markets are overestimating how much additional tightening the Bank of England can deliver. We are upgrading our recommended strategic stance on UK Gilts from underweight (2 out of 5) to overweight (4 out of 5). Not All Central Bankers Can Credibly Restore Credibility Chart 1Developed Market Bond Yields Back To 2018 Highs Three more central bank meetings, three more rate hikes. Last week brought a 50bp hike from the Fed, a 25bp hike – the first of this tightening cycle – by the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) and a 25bp rate increase from the Bank of England (BoE). The Fed and RBA moves did little to stabilize the government bond bear markets in the US and Australia, but the BoE was able to provide a temporary reprieve for the Gilt selloff by playing up potential UK recession (stagflation?) risks. Bond yields worldwide remains laser focused on high global inflation and the associated monetary policy response that will be needed to stabilize inflation expectations (Chart 1). That includes both interest rate hikes and reducing the size of bloated central bank balance sheets. The threat of such “double tightening” is weighing on global growth expectations and risk asset valuations. The MSCI World equity index is down -6.4% (in USD terms) so far in the Q2/2022 and down -14.5% since the mid-November/2021 peak. Although in a more mitigated way, credit markets are also being impacted, with the Bloomberg Global High-Yield index down -2.6% so far in Q2 on an excess return basis versus government bonds. Rate hike expectations have started to catch up to elevated inflation expectations, at least according to inflation linked bonds. The yield on 10-year US TIPS now sits at +0.29%, a huge swing from the -1% level seen just one month ago (Chart 2). The 10-year real yield is even higher in Canada (+0.81%) where the Bank of Canada just delivered its own 50bp rate hike in April. On the other hand, 10-year real yields remain deeply below 0% in Europe and the UK, where central bankers have been providing less explicit guidance on future rate hikes and asset purchase reductions compared to the Fed or Bank of Canada. Interest rate markets remain reluctant to price in significantly positive real policy interest rates at the peak of the current tightening cycle. Our proxy for the real terminal rate expectation, the 5-year/5-year overnight index swap rate (OIS) minus the 5-year/5-year CPI swap rate, is only +0.18% in the US. It is still deeply negative in Europe (-1.53%) and the UK (-0.97%). Our estimates of the term premium component of 10-year government bond yields in those three markets is rising alongside interest rate expectations yet remains deeply negative in Europe and the UK (Chart 3). Chart 2Real Rate Divergences In The Face Of A Global Inflation Shock​​​​​​ Chart 3Markets Still Pricing In Structurally Low Rates​​​​​​ Of those three major bond markets, we see the UK term premium as being the least likely to see additional upward repricing, with the BoE less likely than the Fed or ECB to push for an aggressively smaller balance sheet given domestic economic risks. UK Rate Expectations Are Too Hawkish Chart 4Our BoE Monitor Justifies Recent Tightening Moves The Bank of England raised rates by 25bps last week, pushing Bank Rate to a 13-year high of 1.0%. The decision was a 6-3 majority, with three Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) members calling for a 50bp hike – matching recent moves by other G-10 central banks like the Fed and Bank of Canada – given tight UK capacity constraints (i.e. low unemployment) and high realized inflation. The MPC noted that additional rate increases would likely be necessary to tame very high UK inflation, a message confirmed by the elevated level of our UK Central Bank Monitor (Chart 4). However, the new economic forecasts presented by the BoE painted a gloomy picture on UK growth, raising the risks of a recession even as UK inflation is expected to continue climbing to a 10% peak in late 2022 on the back of high energy prices.1 Strictly looking at current inflation, the case for the BoE to continue hiking rates is obvious. Yet the BoE may now be placing more weight on the downside risks to growth from the energy shock, at a time when fiscal tightening is no longer providing stimulus. In the press conference following last week’s MPC meeting, BoE Governor Andrew Bailey noted the difficult situation policymakers are facing given the huge surge in energy prices that is fueling inflation while also weighing on household and business real incomes. So what is “neutral” anyway? Related Report  Global Fixed Income StrategyThe UK Leads The Way The BoE is one of the least transparent major central banks when it comes to providing guidance on what it thinks the neutral policy rate is. Market participants are left to arrive at their own conclusions and those can vary substantially, as is currently the case. The UK OIS curve is discounting a peak in rates of 2.72% in 2023 and discounting rate cuts after that starting in 2024. Yet the respondents to the BoE’s new Market Participants Survey are calling for a much lower trajectory with rates peaking at 1.75% before falling to 1.5% in 2024 (Chart 5). Those rate levels are in the lower half of the range of longer-run neutral rate estimates from the same Market Participants Survey, between 1.5% and 2.0% (the shaded box in the chart). Chart 5UK Rate Expectations Are Too High Chart 6Recessionary BoE Forecasts, Except For GDP Combining the messages from the OIS curve and the Survey, markets are pricing in a path for the BoE Bank Rate that will become restrictive by mid-2023, with another 172bps of rate hikes. The BoE uses market pricing for future interest rates in its economic forecasts. The Bank’s models suggest that a move to raise rates to 2.5% in response to high UK inflation, as markets are discounting, would result in a severe UK downturn that would both push up unemployment from the current 3.7% to 5.4% by Q2/2025 (Chart 6). Headline inflation would plunge to 1.3% over the same period as the UK output gap widens to -2.25% of GDP from the current “excess demand” level of +0.5%. Oddly enough, the BoE is only forecasting a flat profile for real GDP growth over that entire three-year forecasting period, although there will clearly be some negative GDP prints during that period to generate such a massively disinflationary outcome. A mixed picture on UK growth Currently, the UK economy is flashing some warning signs on growth momentum. The UK manufacturing PMI was 55.8 in April, still well above the 50 level indicating growth but 9.8 pts below the cyclical peak in 2021 (Chart 7). The services PMI is in better shape at 58.9, but it did dip lower in the latest reading. The GfK consumer confidence index has fallen sharply in response to contacting real household income growth, reaching the second-lowest reading in the history of the series dating back to 1974 in April. This is a warning sign for consumer spending – retail sales fell in April for the first time in fifteen months (middle panel). Business confidence is also impacted by the high costs of both energy and labor that is squeezing profit margins. UK real investment spending is nearly contracting on a year-over-year basis, despite the robust readings on investment intentions from the BoEs’ Agents Survey of UK businesses (bottom panel).UK firms are facing higher wage costs at a time of very tight labor market and robust labor demand. The BoE estimates that UK private sector wage growth, after adjusting for compositional effects related to the pandemic, will accelerate to 5.1% by the end of Q2/2022 (Chart 8). Chart 7UK Growth Facing Inflationary Headwinds​​​​​​ Chart 8UK Labor Market Remains Healthy​​​​​​ Chart 9Will House Prices Signal The Peak In UK Inflation? A robust labor market and quickening wage growth is forcing the BoE to maintain a relatively hawkish bias at a time of high energy inflation, even with the growth outlook darkening in the central bank’s own forecasts. Booming house prices are also making the central bank’s job more challenging. The annual growth rate of the Nationwide UK house price index reached 12.4%, a 17-year high, in March. However, rising mortgage rates and declining household real incomes will likely begin to eat into housing demand and, eventually, help slow the rapid pace of house price growth (Chart 9, bottom panel). Summing it all up, the overall UK inflation picture, including wages and housing costs in addition to energy prices and durable goods prices, will force the BoE to deliver a few more rate hikes before year-end before reaching a peak level that is lower than current market pricing. The neutral UK interest rate is likely very low Chart 10Structurally Weak UK Growth = A Low Neutral Rate The UK economy has suffered from structurally low potential economic growth dating back to the Brexit referendum in 2016. UK businesses stopped investing in the face of the uncertainty over the UK’s relationship with Europe. There has basically been no growth in UK fixed investment over the past five years. In response, UK productivity has only grown an annualized 0.9% over that same period (Chart 10) and the OECD’s estimate of UK potential GDP growth has been cut from 2% to 1.1%. With such low potential growth, the neutral BoE policy interest rate is likely even lower than the 1.5-2% range of estimates from the BoE’s Market Participant Survey. Tighter fiscal policy also lowers the neutral UK interest rate, with the UK Office of Budget Responsibility forecasting a narrowing of the UK budget deficit of -13.6 percentage points between the 2021 peak and 2027 (bottom panel). A flat UK Gilt curve is also a sign that the neutral interest rate is quite low. The 2-year/10-year Gilt curve now sits at a mere -49bps with Bank Rate only at 1% (Chart 11). While this is modestly steeper from the near-inversion of the curve seen at the start of 2022, a very flat curve at a nominal policy rate of only 1% suggests that the neutral rate is not far from the current level. Sluggish UK equity market performance and widening UK corporate credit spreads also argue that Bank Rate may already be turning restrictive, although a lower trade-weighted pound is helping to mitigate the overall tightening of UK financial conditions. Chart 11UK Financial Conditions Are Not Restrictive (Yet)​​​​​​ Chart 12Pressure On The BoE Will Not Peak Until Inflation Does​​​​​​ In the end, the pressure on the BoE to tighten will not ease until UK inflation peaks. The BoE is suffering a severe credibility crisis, with its own public opinion survey showing the deepest level of public dissatisfaction with the bank since the Global Financial Crisis (Chart 12). Inflation expectations are at similar levels that prevailed during that period, although the unique nature of the current inflation upturn, fueled by global supply-chain squeezes and war-related boosts to commodity prices, will likely prevent a repeat of the relatively fast reversal of inflation expectations seen after the Global Financial Crisis. Investment Implications – Get Ready For Gilt Outperformance Chart 13Upgrade UK Gilts To Overweight With the BoE already pushing Bank Rate towards a plausible neutral range, we do not expect many more rate hikes in the UK. Our base case is that the BoE hikes 2-3 more times by year-end, pushing Bank Rate to 1.5-1.75%, before pausing. This would represent a lower peak in policy rates than currently priced in the UK OIS curve. That is a relatively dovish outcome that typically leads to positive performance for a government bond market according to our “Global Golden Rule” framework, which we will revisit in next week’s Strategy Report. For now, however, we see a strong case to turn more positive on UK Gilts, with the BoE likely to deliver fewer rate hikes than discounted (Chart 13). The BoE is also far less likely to begin reducing its balance sheet by selling its Gilt holdings back to the market. BoE Governor Bailey strongly hinted last week that such aggressive quantitative tightening (QT) was not a given, even after the Bank research staff presents its proposals to the MPC in August. A delay in QT would also be a factor boosting UK Gilt performance versus other developed economy bond markets where more aggressive reductions in central bank balance sheets are more likely, like the US and potentially even the euro area. This week, we are upgrading our recommended strategic UK weighting from underweight to overweight. In next week’s report, we will consider the proper allocation for the UK within our model bond portfolio, after reviewing potential bond return forecasts stemming from our Global Golden Rule. Bottom Line: Markets are overestimating how much additional tightening the Bank of England can deliver. We are upgrading our recommended strategic stance on UK Gilts from underweight (2 out of 5) to overweight (4 out of 5). Robert Robis, CFA Chief Fixed Income Strategist rrobis@bcaresearch.com   Footnotes 1      The mechanical way that the UK government’s energy price regulator, Ofgem, sets price caps on retail gas and electricity costs - based on changes in wholesale energy costs implied by futures curves – means that UK household energy prices will rise by 40% in October, according to BoE estimates. GFIS Model Bond Portfolio Recommended Positioning     Active Duration Contribution: GFIS Recommended Portfolio Vs. Custom Performance Benchmark The GFIS Recommended Portfolio Vs. The Custom Benchmark Index Tactical Overlay Trades

Listen to a short summary of this report.       Executive Summary Global Equities Are More Attractively Valued After The Recent Sell-Off We tactically downgraded global equities in late February but see the current level of stock prices as offering enough upside to warrant an overweight. Global equities are now trading at 15.6-times forward earnings, and only 12.6-times outside the US. More importantly, the forces that pushed down stock prices are starting to abate: The war in Ukraine no longer seems likely to devolve into a broader conflict; the number of new Covid cases in China has fallen by half; and global inflation has peaked. The next 18 months of falling inflation and receding recession fears could see stocks recover much of their losses. The “Last Hurrah” for equities is coming. We continue to think that over a 5-year horizon, bond yields will rise from current levels, value stocks will outperform growth stocks, and crypto prices will fall. However, countertrend rallies are likely. To express this view, we recommend taking partial profits on our short 10-year Treasury trade recommendation (up 9.3% from an initial entry yield of 1.45% on June 30, 2021). We are also halving our long global value/growth position (up 20.1% since inception on December 10, 2020) and our short Bitcoin position (up 98% based on our exponential shorting technique). Bottom Line: Global equities are heading towards a “last Hurrah” starting in the second half of this year. Tactically upgrade stocks to overweight.   Feature Dear Client, We published a Special Alert early this afternoon tactically upgrading global equities to overweight. As promised, the enclosed report elaborates on our view change. Best regards, Peter Berezin Restore Tactical Overweight On Global Equities Chart 1Global Equities Are More Attractively Valued After The Recent Sell-Off We tactically downgraded global equities from overweight to neutral on February 28th. The war in Ukraine, the Covid outbreak in China, and most importantly, the rise in bond yields have kept us on the sidelines ever since. At this point, however, the outlook for stocks has brightened, and thus we are restoring our tactical (3-month) overweight to stocks so that it is consistent with our bullish 12-month cyclical view. First, valuations have discounted much of the bad news. After the recent sell-off, global equities are trading at 15.6-times forward earnings (Chart 1). Outside the US, they trade at only 12.6-times forward earnings. Second, the forces that pushed down stock prices are starting to abate. The war in Ukraine is approaching a stalemate, with Russian troops unable to take much of the country, let alone seriously threaten regional neighbours. A European embargo on Russian oil is likely but will be watered down significantly before it is implemented. European officials have shied away from banning Russian natural gas, an action that would have much more severe economic implications. While still very high in absolute terms, December-2022 European natural gas futures are down 36% from their peak on March 7 (Chart 2). The 7-day average of new Covid cases in China has fallen by more than half since late April (Chart 3). Considering that a significant fraction of China’s elderly population is unvaccinated, the authorities will continue to play whack-a-mole with the virus for the next few months (Chart 4). Fortunately, Chinese domestic production of Pfizer’s Paxlovid anti-Covid drug is starting to ramp up, which should allow for some easing in lockdown measures later this year. Chart 2European Natural Gas Futures Have Come Off The Boil Chart 3Covid Cases Are Falling In China… The 20th Chinese National Party Congress is slated for this fall. In the lead-up to the Congress, it is likely that the government will move to diffuse social tensions over its handling of the pandemic by showering the economy with stimulus funds. Of note, the credit impulse has already turned higher, which bodes well for both Chinese growth and growth abroad (Chart 5). Chart 4… But Low Vaccination Rates Among The Elderly Remain A Risk Chart 5A Rebound In China's Credit Impulse Bodes Well For China And The Rest Of The World   Inflation Is Peaking On the inflation front, the data flow has gone from unambiguously bad to neutral (and perhaps even slightly positive). In the US, core goods inflation fell by 0.4% month-over-month in April, the first outright decline in core goods prices since February 2021. The Manheim Used Vehicle Value Index has crested and is now 6.4% below its January peak (Chart 6). Global shipping rates have moved up a bit recently on the back of Chinese port shutdowns but remain well below their highs earlier this year (Chart 7). Chart 6Used Car Prices Appear To Have Peaked Chart 7Global Shipping Rates Are Well Off Their Highs It Is The Composition Of Spending That Is Distorted Despite the often-heard claim that US consumer spending is well above trend, the reality is that spending is more or less in line with its pre-pandemic trend (Chart 8). It is the composition of spending that is out of line: Goods spending is well above trend while services spending is well below. One might think that only the overall level of spending should matter for inflation, and that the composition of spending is irrelevant. However, this ignores the reality that services prices are generally stickier than goods prices. Companies that sold fitness equipment during the pandemic had no qualms about raising prices. In contrast, gyms barely cut prices, figuring that lower membership fees would do little to drive new business through the door (Chart 9). Chart 8Total US Consumer Spending Is Almost Exactly At Its Pre-Pandemic Trend, But The Composition Of Spending Remains Skewed Chart 9Asymmetries Matter: Firms Manufacturing Sports Equipment Jacked Up Prices, But Gyms Barely Cut Prices This asymmetry matters, and it suggests that goods inflation should continue to fall over the coming months as the composition of spending shifts back to services. A Lull In Wage Growth Wages are the most important determinant of services inflation. While it is too early to be certain, the latest data suggest that wage growth has peaked. The 3-month annualized growth rate in average hourly earnings for production and nonsupervisory workers slowed from 7.2% in the second half of 2021 to 3.8% in April (Chart 10). Assuming productivity growth of around 1.5%, this is consistent with inflation of only slightly more than 2%. Nominal wage growth is a function of both labor market slack and expected inflation. Slack should increase modestly during the rest of the year as labor participation recovers. Chart 11 shows that the labor force participation rate is still about 0.9 percentage points below where one would expect it to be, even adjusting for an aging population and increased early retirements. Chart 10Wage Growth Seems To Be Topping Out Chart 11Labor Participation Has Further Scope To Recover Employment has been particularly depressed among lower-wage workers (Chart 12). This should change as more low-wage workers exhaust their savings and are forced to seek employment. According to the Fed, the lowest-paid 20% of workers are the only group to have seen their bank deposits dwindle since mid-2021 (Chart 13). Chart 12More Low-Wage Employees Will Return To Work Chart 13The Savings Of Low-Wage Workers Are Dwindling Inflation expectations should come down as goods inflation recedes and oil prices come off their highs (Chart 14). Bob Ryan, BCA’s Chief Commodity Strategist, sees the price of Brent averaging $86/bbl in the second half of this year, down 16% from current levels.  Central Banks Will Dial Back The Hawkishness With inflation set to fall over the remainder of the year, and financial markets showing increasing signs of stress, the Fed and other central banks will adopt a softer tone. It is worth noting that the median terminal dot for the Fed funds rate actually declined from 2.5% to 2.4% in the March Summary of Economic Projections (Chart 15). Given that markets expect US interest rates to rise to 3.25% in 2023, the Fed may not want investors to further rachet up rate expectations. Chart 14US Inflation Expectations Should Recede If Oil Prices Drop Chart 15Rate Expectations Have Moved Well Above The Fed's Estimate of Neutral   The Bank of England has already veered in a more dovish direction. Its latest forecast, released on May 5, showed real GDP contracting slightly in 2023. Based on market interest rate expectations, the BoE sees headline inflation falling to 1.5% by end-2024, below its target of 2%. Even assuming that interest rates remain at 1%, the BoE believes that inflation will only be slightly above 2% at the end of 2024, implying little need for incremental policy tightening. Not surprisingly, the pound has sold off. We have been tactically short GBP/USD but are using this opportunity to turn tactically neutral. Given favorable valuations, we like the pound over the long run. Chart 16Spending In The Euro Area Is Well Below Its Pre-Pandemic Trend The euro area provides a good example of the dangers of focusing too much on short-term inflation dynamics. Supply-side disruptions stemming from the pandemic and the war in Ukraine have weighed on European growth this year. Yet, those very same factors have also pushed up inflation. Harmonized inflation across the euro area reached 7.5% in April, the highest since the launch of the common currency. The ECB is eager to put some distance between policy rates and the zero bound. However, there is little need for significant tightening. Unlike in the US, spending in the euro area is well below its pre-pandemic trend (Chart 16). If anything, more inflation would be welcome since that would give the ECB scope to bring real rates further into negative territory if economic conditions warrant it. To its credit, the Bank of Japan has stuck with its yield curve control system, even as bond yields have risen elsewhere in the world. Japan’s currency has weakened but given that inflation expectations are too low, and virtually all of its debt is denominated in yen, that is hardly a bad thing. Too Late? Has the surge in bond yields already done enough damage to the global economy to make a recession inevitable? We do not think so. As noted above, much of the recent harm has been caused by various dislocations, namely the war in Ukraine and the ongoing effects of the pandemic. As these dislocations dissipate, inflation will fall and global growth will recover. Despite the hoopla over how the US economy contracted in the first quarter, real private final sales to domestic purchasers (a measure of GDP growth that strips out the effects of changes in government spending, inventories, and net exports) rose by 3.7% at an annualized rate. As Table 1 shows, this measure of economic activity has the highest predictive power for GDP growth one-quarter ahead. Table 1A Good Sign: Real Final Sales To Private Domestic Purchasers Rose By 3.7% In Q1 Meanwhile, and completely overlooked at this point, S&P 500 earnings have come in 7.3% above expectations so far in Q1, with nearly 80% of S&P 500 companies surprising on the upside. Earnings are up 10.4% year-over-year in Q1. Sales are up 13.6%. Looking out to Q4 of 2022, S&P companies are expected to earn $60.93 in EPS, up 4.3% from what analysts expected at the start of the year. It is also worth noting that homebuilder stocks have basically been flat over the past 30 days, even as the S&P 500 has dropped by nearly 10% over this period. Housing is the most interest rate-sensitive sector of the economy. With the homeowner vacancy rate at record low levels, even today’s mortgage rates may not be enough to push the economy into recession (Chart 17). Economic vulnerabilities are greater outside the US. Nevertheless, there is enough pent-up demand on both the consumer and capital spending side to sustain growth. The Last Hurrah How long will the “Goldilocks” period of falling inflation and supply-side driven growth last? Our guess is about 18 months, starting this summer and lasting until the end of 2023. Unfortunately, as is often the case, the benign environment that will emerge in the second half of this year will sow the seeds of its own demise. Real wages are currently falling across the major economies (Chart 18). That has dampened consumer confidence and spending. However, as inflation comes down, real wage growth will turn positive. This will stoke demand, leading to a reacceleration in inflation, most likely in late 2023 or early 2024. Chart 17Tight Supply Makes Housing More Resilient Chart 18Real Wages Are Falling In Most Countries   In the end, central banks will discover that the neutral rate of interest is higher than they thought. That is good news for stocks in the short-to-medium run because it means that forthcoming rate hikes will not induce a recession. Down the road, however, a higher neutral rate means that investors will eventually need to value stocks using a higher discount rate. It also means that the disinflation we envision over the next 18 months will not last. All this puts us in the rather lonely “transitory transitory” camp: We think much of today’s high inflation will prove to be transitory, but the transitory nature of that inflation will itself be transitory. Be that as it may, the next 18 months of falling inflation and receding recession fears could see stocks recover much of their losses. For most investors, that is too long a period to sit on the sidelines. The “Last Hurrah” for equities is coming. Taking Partial Profits On Our Short Treasury, Long Value/Growth, And Short Bitcoin Trades We continue to think that over a 5-year horizon, bond yields will rise from current levels, value stocks will outperform growth stocks, and crypto prices will fall. However, with the “Last Hurrah” approaching, countertrend rallies are likely. To express this view, we recommend taking half profits on our short 10-year Treasury trade recommendation (up 9.3% from an initial entry yield of 1.45% on June 30, 2021). We are also halving our long global value/growth position (up 20.1% since inception on December 10, 2020), and our short Bitcoin position (up 98% based on our exponential shorting technique). Peter Berezin Chief Global Strategist peterb@bcaresearch.com Global Investment Strategy View Matrix Special Trade Recommendations Current MacroQuant Model Scores

Executive Summary The Fed offered more explicit near-term forward rate guidance at its meeting last week. This guidance will reduce yield volatility at the front-end of the curve during the next few months. We expect the Fed to deliver two more 50 basis point rate hikes (in June and July) before settling into a pattern of hiking by 25 bps at each meeting. Our anticipated Fed hike path is shallower than what is priced in the market, but it also lasts longer. Investors should position for this outcome by buying the December 2022 SOFR futures contract versus the December 2024 contract. Economic and financial market indicators suggest that the 10-year Treasury yield will fall back during the next six months, alongside falling inflation. Rate Expectations Bottom Line: Investors should keep portfolio duration close to benchmark for now, though we expect to get an opportunity to reduce portfolio duration later this year once inflation and bond yields are lower. Feature Last week was a chaotic one for the US bond market. Treasury yields rose and the Fed delivered its first 50 basis point rate increase since 2000. Yet, there is a broad consensus that the Fed’s message was dovish relative to expectations. In this week’s report we try to make sense of these confusing market signals. We do this by focusing on two important occurrences: (1) The Fed’s “dovish” 50 basis point rate hike and (2) The 10-year Treasury yield breaking above 3% for the first time since 2018. The Fed Takes Back Control Chart 1An Uncertain Rates Market Fed Chair Jay Powell had a clear agenda for last week’s FOMC press conference. Simply, he wanted to provide more concrete forward rate guidance to a market that had become increasingly volatile (Chart 1). The problem is that while the Fed had been explicit about its intention to lift rates, it hadn’t provided any firm guidance about its anticipated pace of tightening. This led to wild speculation in rates markets. Will the Fed lift rates at every meeting or every other meeting? Will it move in traditional 25 basis point increments or perhaps 50 basis point increments? Maybe even 75 basis point increments? This sort of speculation is unacceptable to Chair Powell who said in his opening remarks that the Fed “will strive to avoid adding uncertainty to what is already an extraordinarily challenging and uncertain time.”1 New Explicit Forward Guidance From Chair Powell’s post-meeting press conference, we can discern the following about the Fed’s near-term rate hike intentions. The Fed will not lift rates by 75 basis points at any single meeting. Two more 50 basis point rate hikes are likely at the June and July FOMC meetings. After July, the Fed will likely continue to lift rates at each FOMC meeting. Inflation’s trend will dictate whether these rate increases are delivered in 50 bps or 25 bps increments. The Fed will continue to lift rates at every meeting until it is confident that it has “done enough to get us on a path to restore price stability.” It’s also worth noting that, in addition to delivering a 50 basis point rate hike and providing firmer forward rate guidance, the Fed announced that it will begin shrinking its balance sheet on June 1. The Fed will follow the plan that was presented in the minutes from the March FOMC meeting and that we discussed in a recent report.2 Turning to markets, we see that the overnight index swap curve (OIS) is priced for an additional 201 bps of rate increases between now and the end of 2022 (Chart 2). This is consistent with three more 50 basis point rate hikes and two more 25 basis point rate hikes at this year’s five remaining FOMC meetings. If delivered, those hikes would bring the fed funds rate up to a range of 2.75% to 3.00%. Chart 2Rate Expectations Looking out until the end of 2023, we see the OIS curve priced for 262 bps of rate increases. That is, the market is priced for roughly 200 bps of tightening between now and the end of 2022, but only another 62 bps of rate increases in 2023. In fact, Chart 2 shows that the OIS curve has the funds rate peaking at 3.49% near the middle of 2023 and then edging slowly back down. Related Report  US Investment StrategyWage-Price Spiral? Not So Fast Based on our view that inflation will decline between now and the end of the year, we see the Fed delivering only 175 bps of additional tightening this year (50 bps rate hikes in June and July, followed by three more 25 bps hikes). This is slightly lower than what is priced in the curve. However, given the strong state of private sector balance sheets, we can also easily envision 25 basis point rate increases continuing at every meeting in 2023. That scenario would push the fed funds rate above 4% by the end of 2023, significantly higher than what is priced in the market. We recommend that investors position for this “slower, but longer” tightening cycle by buying the December 2022 SOFR futures contract versus the December 2024 contract (see “Yield Curve Trades” table on page 12). Charts 3A-3D focus more specifically on what’s priced in for the next few FOMC meetings. The charts show where the fed funds rate is expected to land after each meeting, as implied by the fed funds futures curve. Additionally, we use an ‘x’ to denote where we expect the fed funds rate to be at the end of each meeting. You can see that we expect the fed funds rate to be about 25 bps lower than the market by the end of September. Our expectation of a slower near-term hike pace stems from our view that inflation has already peaked.3 With that in mind, it’s notable that monthly core PCE inflation printed below levels consistent with the Fed’s 2022 forecasts in both February and March (Chart 4). In addition, last week’s employment report showed a significant deceleration in average hourly earnings (Chart 5). Average hourly earnings are an imperfect wage measure because they don’t adjust for the changing industry composition of the workforce. However, an adjusted measure that gives each industry group equal weighting is also starting to slow (Chart 5, bottom panel). Chart 3AMay 2022 FOMC Meeting Chart 3BJune 2022 FOMC Meeting Chart 3CJuly 2022 FOMC Meeting Chart 3DSeptember 2022 FOMC Meeting Chart 4Tracking Below The Fed's Forecast Chart 5Peak Wage Growth Bottom Line: The Fed’s more explicit rate guidance will reduce yield volatility at the front-end of the curve. Two more 50 basis point rate hikes are likely in June and July, but we expect falling inflation will prompt the Fed to switch to 25 basis point hikes after that. We also expect the tightening cycle to last longer than what is currently priced in the curve. Investors should keep portfolio duration close to benchmark and should position for our expected “slower, but longer” tightening cycle by owning the December 2022 SOFR futures contract versus the December 2024 contract. A Quick Note On The Neutral Rate And Financial Conditions Chart 6Financial Conditions Chart 2 shows that the market expects the Fed to lift the funds rate until it is slightly above the range of the Fed’s long-run neutral rate estimates (2% - 3%). At that point, restrictive monetary policy will presumably weigh on economic growth enough for the Fed to back away from tightening. While forecasters need some estimate of the neutral rate to predict where bond yields will land at the end of the cycle, it’s important to understand that Fed policymakers are not guided by these same concerns. In fact, Chair Powell said the following last week when asked whether the Fed intended to lift rates above estimates of neutral: … there’s not a bright line drawn on the road that tells us when we get [to neutral]. So we’re going to be looking at financial conditions, right. Our policy affects financial conditions and financial conditions affect the economy. So we’re going to be looking at the effect of our policy moves on financial conditions. Are they tightening appropriately? And then we’re going to be looking at the effects on the economy. And we’re going to be making a judgment about whether we’ve done enough to get us on a path to restore price stability. In other words, actual Fed policy will not be guided by neutral rate estimates. Instead, the Fed will continue lifting rates at a regular pace until it sees enough evidence of tightening financial conditions and slowing inflation. For this reason, it will be critical to monitor broad indexes of financial conditions as the Fed tightens policy. At present, the Goldman Sachs Financial Conditions Index remains deep in “accommodative” territory, but it is rising quickly (Chart 6). Based on history, we might expect the pace of tightening to slow once the index breaks into “restrictive” territory. Conversely, if financial conditions don’t tighten very much, then it will encourage the Fed to hike more aggressively.  The Return Of 3% Treasury Yields Chart 7Back Above 3% The 10-year Treasury yield broke above 3% after the FOMC meeting on Wednesday and it has so far held firm above that key psychological level. The last time the 10-year yield reached these heights was near the end of the last tightening cycle in 2018 (Chart 7). One big difference between today and 2018 being that today’s 3% 10-year yield consists of a much higher inflation component and a much lower real yield (Chart 7, bottom panel). At 2.88%, the cost of inflation compensation embedded in the 10-year yield is too high, and it will fall as inflation rolls over and the Fed tightens. There is a question, however, about whether this drop in 10-year inflation expectations will translate into a lower nominal bond yield or simply be offset by a rising 10-year real yield. The answer will depend on how quickly inflation comes down off its highs. Chart 85y5y Is Above Neutral If inflation falls quickly during the next few months, then the market will start to price-in a less aggressive Fed. This will hold down the 10-year real yield. However, if inflation remains sticky near its current level, then the market will judge that the Fed still has a lot of work to do. This will pressure 10-year real yields higher even if long-dated inflation expectations recede. It’s often simpler to ignore the breakdown between real yields and inflation expectations and focus purely on the nominal bond yield itself. This exercise strongly suggests that long-maturity nominal bond yields will fall back somewhat during the next six months. First, we observe that the 5-year/5-year forward Treasury yield has risen to 3.19%, above the upper-end of survey estimates of the long-run neutral fed funds rate (Chart 8). Long-maturity forward yields have rarely moved much above the range of neutral rate estimates during the past decade. Second, high-frequency indicators that historically correlate with bond yields have not justified the recent move higher in the 10-year yield. The ratio between the CRB Raw Industrials commodity price index and gold and the relative performance of cyclical versus defensive equity sectors have both stalled out, even as yields have shot up (Chart 9). Finally, the change in bond yields correlates strongly with the level of economic data surprises. Positive data surprises tend to coincide with a rising Treasury yield, and vice-versa. Economic data surprises have been positive during the past few months, justifying the move higher in yields (Chart 10). However, that trend is poised to reverse in the coming months. Economic momentum is bound to slow now that the Fed is tightening and the labor market is close to full employment. Further, the Economic Surprise Index exhibits a strong mean-reverting pattern. Extremely high values tend to be followed by lower values, and vice-versa. A simple auto-regressive model of the Surprise Index suggests that it is on track to turn negative within the next month. Chart 9Bonds Go Their Own Way Chart 10Economic Data Surprises Bottom Line: Our indicators suggest that the 10-year Treasury yield will fall back somewhat during the next six months. That said, on a longer-run horizon we continue to expect that interest rates will rise further than the market anticipates. Investors should maintain neutral portfolio duration for now, but stand ready to re-initiate below-benchmark positions later this year once inflation and bond yields are lower. A Quick Note On The Yield Curve And Credit Spreads Yield Curve Positioning Not only have bond yields increased since the Fed meeting last Wednesday, but the Treasury curve has also steepened significantly. The turnaround in the yield curve has been startling. The 2-year/10-year Treasury slope was inverted one month ago, but it is now back up to 40 bps (Chart 11). But despite the big moves in the 2/10 slope, the yield curve remains quite flat beyond the 5-year maturity point. In fact, the 2/5/10 butterfly spread – the 5-year yield minus the yield on a duration-matched 2/10 barbell – remains far too high compared to the 2/10 slope (Chart 11, bottom 2 panels). Therefore, our recommended yield curve positioning remains unchanged. Investors should buy the 5-year Treasury note versus a duration-matched barbell consisting of the 2-year and 10-year notes. Credit Spreads A steeper yield curve has positive implications for corporate bond spreads. All else equal, a steeper yield curve suggests that we are further away from the end of the economic recovery, meaning that corporate bonds have a longer window for outperformance. That said, at 40 bps, the 2-year/10-year Treasury slope is still relatively flat, and while corporate bond spreads have widened during the past few months, the high-yield index option-adjusted spread is still close to its 2019 level and the 12-month breakeven spread for the investment grade index is still below its median since 1995 (Chart 12). Chart 11Favor The 5-Year Chart 12Corporate Bond Valuation We remain cautious on corporate credit for the time being. Specifically, we recommend an underweight allocation (2 out of 5) to investment grade corporates and a neutral allocation (3 out of 5) to high-yield. However, if the 2-year/10-year Treasury slope were to steepen to above 50 bps and/or if corporate bond spreads were to widen further, then we may see an opportunity this year to tactically increase exposure. Stay tuned. Ryan Swift US Bond Strategist rswift@bcaresearch.com Footnotes 1    https://www.federalreserve.gov/mediacenter/files/FOMCpresconf20220504.p… 2    Please see US Bond Strategy Weekly Report, “Peak Inflation,” dated April 19, 2022. 3    Please see US Bond Strategy Weekly Report, “Peak Inflation,” dated April 19, 2022.   Recommended Portfolio Specification Other Recommendations Treasury Index Returns Spread Product Returns

Executive Summary Ingredients For A Policy Mistake The hawks on the European Central Bank Governing Council have become vocal about a July rate hike. Such a move would be a policy mistake because European growth is weak, while inflation is supply-driven and will soften meaningfully. July 2022 hike is not yet certain. A policy mistake suggests that the current interest rate pricing for June 23 is too aggressive. Buy June 2023 Euribor contract. The serious risk of a policy mistake and the uncertainty surrounding Europe’s energy security confirm that investors should maintain a defensive stance in European assets. The pronounced threats to UK growth warrant a negative view on the pound.   Recommendation INCEPTION DATE RETURN SINCE INCEPTION (%) COMMENT Buy June 2023 Euribor contract 05/09/2022     Bottom Line: Stay defensive in Europe. The risk of a policy mistake is high. Only when inflation peaks should investors move into cyclical stocks.   In recent weeks, a chorus of ECB hawks expressed the need to increase rates as early as July 2022. Inflation data is on their side; HICP stands at 7.5% and core CPI has reached 3.5%, levels never seen since the introduction of the euro. Markets are responding. The ESTR curve is pricing in a positive ECB deposit rate for the October 2022 Governing Council meeting. We need to examine the underlying European economic picture to address two key questions: Will the ECB lift rates as early as July? And will doing so constitute a policy mistake that would hurt European assets? Weaker Growth Let’s start with the growth outlook. European economic activity is rapidly deteriorating. Real GDP growth in the Eurozone has slowed markedly. In Q1, real GDP growth fell to 0.2% quarter-on-quarter or an annualized rate of 0.8%. Worrisomely, Italy’s GDP contracted by -0.2% over that time frame and the very economically sensitive Swedish activity contracted by -0.4%, which suggests that Europe’s deceleration is only starting. Soft data confirm the flagging economic outlook on the continent. Consumer confidence is plunging to levels that are consistent with a recession, led by the collapse in the willingness to make large purchases (Chart 1, top panel). The ZEW as well as the Ifo survey confirm that growth expectations point to a very large decline in output (Chart 1, bottom panel). The weakness is also evident in hard data. High inflation erodes real household income, which squeezes consumer spending. Retail sales across Europe are slowing sharply, only growing at an annual rate of 0.8% while contracting -0.4% on a monthly basis; on a level basis, they are lower today than they were in June 2021. Meanwhile, German retail sales volumes are falling at a -5.4% annual rate. The situation is even worse for new car registrations, which are collapsing at an annual rate of 20.2% (Chart 2). Chart 1Soft Data Point To Soft Growth... Chart 2...So Do Hard Data Industrial production has not been spared. Euro Area IP softened to 2% annually in February and contractions are now visible in Germany and France. Some of this weakness reflects supply difficulties, but the -3.1% annual fall in German factory orders indicates that demand is frail too and that industrial production will shrink further in the months ahead (Chart 2, bottom panel). The deterioration in the global outlook further hurts Europe economic prospects. Our global growth tax indicator, based on energy prices, the dollar, and global bond yields, points toward a further deceleration in the global and US manufacturing PMI, it suggests Euro Area PMIs could fall below 50 (Chart 3). China woes continue to reverberate throughout the global economy. Potential supply constraints will hurt industrial production, but, more importantly, the weakness in China’s marginal propensity to consume (as measured by the gap between the growth rate of M1 relative to M2) predicts a much greater deterioration in European industrial orders, which means that the demand for European capital goods will slow (Chart 3, bottom panel). Chart 3Risks To The Downside Chart 4Tightening Financial Conditions European financial conditions are also tightening significantly. The iTraxx Crossover Index is rising swiftly. European high-yield corporate spreads are now above 450bps, levels that coincide with past recessions in the Euro Area (Chart 4). Government bond markets are increasingly under duress too. Italian BTPs now yield close to 200bps above German Bunds (Chart 4, bottom panel), which accentuates the periphery’s pain. Bottom Line: The Eurozone economy is slowing sharply. While Q1 GDP avoided a contraction, soft and hard data indicators suggest that Q2 is likely to record an actual output contraction for the whole Euro bloc. High Inflation, But For How Long? At first glance, European inflation numbers scream for an ECB rate hike, preferably one yesterday. However, the picture is not that clear-cut. Supply factors predominantly drive the Eurozone’s inflation surge. Chart 5 highlights the role of energy, utilities, food, and transportation costs in the HICP and shows that these factors account for more than 80% of the 7.5% HICP rate. Moreover, the fluctuations in energy CPI continue to explain most of the gyration in headline CPI. The close relationship between energy CPI and core CPI highlights an elevated degree of pass-though, the result of higher electricity and transportation costs (Chart 6). Chart 5Energy, Food And Transport Dominate European CPI Chart 6All About Energy Chart 7No Demand Pull-Inflation In Europe Unlike those in the US, Euro Area underlying inflation drivers are weak and inconsistent with demand-pull inflation. Wage growth in Europe stands at a paltry 1.6% annual rate, while in the US, the Atlanta Fed Wage Tracker has jumped to 4.5% (Chart 7, top panel). Moreover, Eurozone rent inflation remains stable at 1.2%, while it is a very elevated 4.5% in the US (Chart 7, bottom panel). The bifurcation in demand-driven inflation reflects vastly different output gaps between the two regions. US nominal GDP stands 2.5% above its 2014-2019 trend, while that of the Eurozone is still 5.3% below it. In the consumer durable goods sector, where the US experienced the greatest demand-supply mismatch – and therefore, the greatest inflation pressures – purchases are 25% above their 2014-2019 trend, while in Europe, they are still 9.5% below that trend (Chart 8) Year-on-year inflation prints should roll over this summer, as highlighted by weakening sequential inflation. Even if it remains elevated, the monthly Trimmed Mean CPI peaked last year. Energy inflation, moreover, is already contracting on a month-to-month basis (Chart 9). Chart 8Mind The Output Gap Chart 9Weakening Sequential Inflation Chart 10A Naive Inflation Forecast Simple simulation exercises also confirm that annual inflation will peak this summer (Chart 10). Monthly headline inflation averaged 0.11% from 2010 to 2019, 0.31% in the first half of 2021, and 0.55% from mid-2021 to January 2022. If we assume that monthly inflation prints remain in line with its most recent average, annual inflation will peak by year-end at 9.1%, before falling to 6.8% by April 2023. However, if monthly inflation falls back to an historically elevated monthly average of 0.31%, annual headline inflation will peak in September and fall back to 3.8% by April 2023. Similarly, if monthly core CPI averages 0.28%, annual core CPI will peak in October before declining to 3.4% by April 2023, but it will fall to 2.1% by April 2023, if monthly core CPI averages an historically elevated 0.17%, or the average observed in the first half of 2021 (Chart 10, bottom two panels). Chart 11A Conditional Inflation Forecast A more sophisticated exercise based on energy prices and the EUR/USD exchange rate also underlines the downside for Euro Area headline inflation. Energy inflation, which drives headline CPI, closely tracks the evolution of brent prices in euro terms and Deutsch natural gas prices. Assuming that natural gas prices average the historically very high level of €100/MWh over the next twelve months, that Brent averages US$95/bbl over that time frame (consistent with BCA’s commodity and energy team forecasts), and that the euro progressively moves back to EUR/USD1.10 by April 2023 (a weaker expectation than BCA’s Foreign Exchange Strategy team  anticipates), then the Eurozone’s energy inflation will collapse to -10% by April 2023 (Chart 11). We can also assume that Russia enacts a full energy embargo on Western Europe if Sweden and Finland apply for NATO membership. In this case, Brent would spike quickly to $140/bbl and natural gas to €250/MWh. In our scenario, prices stay elevated for two months, before they ultimately normalize by early 2023. Under this scenario, energy inflation would experience a spike to 80% (!) in June 2022 before falling back sharply. In all cases, the collapse in energy inflation is consistent with a rapid decline in headline inflation toward 2% in 2023. Bottom Line: European inflation is elevated but remains mainly driven by supply factors, particularly the evolution of energy inflation. Demand-pull inflation is minimal, unlike that in the US. Additionally, both core and headline inflations are set to peak in the coming months based on the evolution of sequential monthly inflation as well as the behavior of the energy market. A July ECB rate hike would constitute a policy mistake for three reasons: (i) the ECB has no control over supply-driven inflation; (ii) Eurozone inflation is set to weaken; and (iii) economic growth will remain poor. Investment Implications Despite the noise made by the hawks, a large amount of uncertainty around the July 2022 meeting’s outcome remains. It is easy to forget that the ECB’s decisions are consensual. Influential members such as Vice-President Luis de Guindos continues to see a July 2022 hike as possible but unlikely. Others, such as Executive Board member Fabio Panetta, are very worried about the Eurozone’s economic slowdown. Moreover, ECB President Christine Lagarde has not endorsed the hawks. In the context of weak growth and a potential top in inflation, achieving consensus about an early summer hike could be difficult. Chart 12Patience Would Be Rewarded The great paradox is that, if the ECB waits before pushing interest rates up, it will have an opportunity to increase rates durably next year. Wage growth is anemic today, but the decline in the Eurozone unemployment rate is consistent with a pickup in salaries in 2023 (Chart 12). Moreover, if energy inflation slows, the relative price-shock that is hurting households and domestic demand will ebb, which will allow consumption to recover. Patience would give Europe strength and the ECB a very strong basis to lift rates sustainably. The hawks will sway the council to their views. Inflation has latency, which means that its inertia may cause HICP to remain elevated beyond this summer. Moreover, the EU’s proposed ban on Russian oil imports along with Sweden’s and Finland’s likely accession-demand to NATO in the upcoming weeks could provoke Russia to strike first by cutting all its energy export to the EU to zero immediately. This would lift inflation for somewhat longer, as we showed in Chart 9. Related Report  European Investment StrategyThe Three Forces Hurting European Earnings In response to the significant risk of a rate hike, we continue to recommend investors stay short cyclical stocks relative to defensive ones. Moreover, if the risk of a Russian energy cutoff increases, so does the threat of a severe recession in Europe, as a recent Bundesbank study posits (Chart 13). Capital preservation is paramount in today’s context; thus, we continue to lean on the side of prudence, especially considering Europe’s soft profit outlook. Once risks recede, we will abandon this strategy. This decision, however, would require clarification of Sweden and Finland’s decision about their membership in NATO as well as Russia’s response, a confirmation that the ECB is not hiking rates in July, and a pullback in inflation surprises, which would prove a powerful help for European equities and the cyclicals/defensive split (Chart 14). Chart 13The Russian Embargo Risk Chart 14Wait For Inflation To Turn In fact, our view that inflation will peak leads to direct implications for European markets. The periods that followed the previous four peaks in European core inflation were associated with an outperformance of small-cap stocks and cyclical stocks over the subsequent six and twelve months as well as declines in German yields and narrower credit spreads (Table 1A). The sectoral implications were not as clear, but industrials enjoyed an edge, while healthcare stocks suffered marked declines. Our conviction is strongest that energy CPI will fall. Again, this environment is associated with an outperformance of small-caps stocks and cyclicals over the following six months (Table 1B). Sector-wise, energy names suffer in this climate along with defensives, especially communication services equities. Table 1APeaks In Core CPI & Subsequent European Asset Performance Table 1BPeaks In Energy CPI & Subsequent European Asset Performance Looking at this period of disinflation more broadly rather than just following peaks in inflation, we find similar results. Declining core CPI is associated with an outperformance of cyclicals relative to defensives as well as strength in small-cap equities (Table 2A). This larger sample allows for a clearer view of sectors. Specifically, the performance of industrials and tech relative to the broad market improves markedly, while utilities suffer greatly. We reach roughly similar conclusions when energy CPI is contracting, except that, in this instance, energy stocks also underperform (Table 2B). Interestingly, so do financial companies. This is a surprising result, but previous instances of weaker energy CPI in the sample reflected weaker demand, not an evolving supply shock. Weaker aggregate demand always hurts financials.  Table 2ADisinflation & Subsequent European Asset Performance Table 2BEnergy Deflation & Subsequent European Asset Performance Bottom Line: The risk of a policy mistake at the July ECB meeting is elevated. A policy mistake suggests that the current interest rate pricing for June 23 is too aggressive. Buy June 2023 Euribor contract. Moreover, Russian energy exports are still under threat. Accordingly, we continue to emphasize capital preservation and favor defensives over cyclicals. However, a buying opportunity will emerge rapidly once inflation peaks, especially if the ECB follows our base case. At this point, investors should buy small-cap and cyclical stocks. Industrials will beat energy, while all the defensive sectors will suffer. The BoE’s Tough Choice The Bank of England is stuck between a rock and a hard place. UK inflation shares characteristics of that of both the Eurozone and the US. On the one hand, energy inflation is increasing and could push headline CPI into double-digit territory around October 2022, once fuel subsidies fully expire. On the other hand, wage growth is strong as labor supply elasticity declined after Brexit. Demand-pull inflation is also rampant, which has pushed core CPI to a 5.7% annual rate. The UK’s cost push inflation, along with the growth slowdown in Europe and increasing tax rates are likely to cause a recession in the UK over the coming twelve months. The demand-pull inflation, however, will force the BoE to hike interest rates. This accentuates the downside risk to UK economic activity. Chart 15BoE's First Victim: The Pound The obvious victim of this configuration is the pound. Weak growth will prevent the BoE from matching the pace of rate hikes of the Fed and poor economic growth will detract from investments in the UK. As a result, we see further downside in GBP/USD (Chart 15). BCA’s FX strategy team is also selling the pound versus the euro. This position is likely to generate further gains as investors will revise down their views for UK economic activity relative to the Euro Area, since they already hold much more dire expectations for the latter than the former. Bottom Line: EUR/GBP possesses more upside. The growth outlook for the Eurozone is poor, but investors currently overestimate the growth path of the UK relative to that of its southern neighbor.   Mathieu Savary, Chief European Strategist Mathieu@bcaresearch.com Tactical Recommendations Cyclical Recommendations Structural Recommendations

Special Report

Executive SummaryIn this report, we look at recent macroeconomic developments through the lens of the business cycle, inflation, and Treasury yield regimes to select winning sectors and styles.The US economy is currently in the slowdown stage of the business cycle, with all of its hallmark attributes, such as slowing growth, elevated inflation, and rising rates.We find that, despite being a real asset, equity performance deteriorates when inflation is on the rise. However, once inflation goes past its apex, the equity rebound is swift.During periods when both inflation and rates are rising, the Energy and Materials sectors tend to outperform, while the Financials and Consumer Discretionary sectors lag.The market is currently in a “high inflation and rising rates” regime but is about to transition to the “inflation is high but falling” regime, and today’s winners may turn into tomorrow’s losers. The new winners are likely to be the Financials, Consumer Discretionary, and Technology sectors.Bottom Line: As inflationary regimes shift, investors can tilt the odds of positive returns in their favor by taking a granular approach to sector selection. So far, 2022 has not been a welcoming year for investors.  All at once, slowing growth, surging inflation, impending monetary tightening, soaring energy prices, lockdowns in China, and a war in the heart of Europe have been thrown at them.With so much happening, it is difficult to separate signal from noise in the cross-currents of economic data. To make sense of the markets, we will look at recent developments through the lens of macroeconomic regimes, focusing on the stages of the business cycle, level and change in inflation, and the direction of Treasury yields.The Business Cycle Is In A Slowdown StageThe business cycle is a cornerstone of any investment decision as it underpins the fundamentals, and preordains the types of assets likely to outperform based on their level of risk and sensitivity to economic growth. The stage of the business cycle is a succinct way to summarize a wide range of economic data, such as capacity utilization, growth, policy, credit conditions, and valuation (Table 1). Table 1Business Cycle Is In A Slowdown Stage While we are barraged with somewhat contradictory economic data, it is still fair to say that we are currently in the middle of the slowdown stage of the business cycle. Our proprietary business cycle indicator, constructed from a mix of soft and hard data across multiple economic dimensions, is trending down, consistent with that position (Chart 1). Furthermore:Growth is slowing, albeit off high levels, and the most recent disappointing ISM PMI is just another case in point. More concerning is that the new orders-to-inventories ratio has plunged (Chart 2);Unemployment is at a 2-year low of 3.6%, and there are currently two job openings per job seeker;Capacity utilization is high;Inflation is elevated;The Fed has commenced a monetary tightening cycle. Chart 1Economic Growth Is Slowing  Chart 2ISM PMI Disappointed As such, during slowdown stage of a business cycle, returns tend to be lower than during recovery and expansion, while volatility is elevated (Chart 3).Chart 3During A Slowdown, Equity Returns Are Paltry, While Volatility Is Elevated If equities are set to deliver pedestrian returns, we need to be more discerning in our sector and style selection. In an environment of slowing growth, growth stocks, large caps, and defensives tend to outperform (Chart 4).  However, we have all observed that Growth has not fared that well due to rapidly rising interest rates and soaring inflation. In order to better understand the implication of the macroeconomic backdrop for equities, we need to drill further down into the inflation and interest-rate regimes.Chart 4During A Slowdown, Quality, Growth, And Defensives Outperform Inflation And Rates RegimesHigh Inflation: Then And NowThe recent spike in inflation came as a shock to most money managers – the last time inflation hit this level was in the 1980s, which predated their investment careers.In the wake of major oil shocks, oil prices quadrupled in 1973-74 and doubled in 1979-80. The combination of high inflation with weak economic growth, fueled by repeated supply shocks, gave rise to the phenomenon of “stagflation”, i.e., soaring inflation accompanied by stagnating economic growth and high unemployment.The high inflation we are living through now was brought about by the pandemic, which ushered in unprecedented fiscal and monetary easing, soaring demand for consumer goods, and a disrupted global supply chain. More recently, inflation has been further exacerbated by the indirect effects of the war in Ukraine, such as skyrocketing energy, food, and materials prices. Despite the challenges of the current period, economic growth is still robust, and unemployment is at historically low levels. Energy and materials prices have soared, but not to the same extent as in the 1970s. And while economic growth is slowing, and stagflation is a risk, it is hardly inevitable.To ensure a more precise study of the sector and style analysis, we will separate the 1970-1984 period and look at it as a template for the performance of equities during a stagflation regime. We will use the 1984 to 2022 period to analyze sector performance during more ordinary inflation regimes.Equities Hate ItEquities are a real asset and, theoretically, should not be affected by inflation – sales and earnings growth are reported in nominal terms, and underlying economic growth is, by far, more important than inflation.Of course, reality is often different from theory, and businesses hate inflation: Not only do they have difficulty budgeting and planning ahead, but they are also often not able to convert sales growth into earnings growth, i.e., their costs may grow faster than their revenues. According to the most recent NFIB survey, 31% of small businesses consider inflation their biggest problem compared to 1-2% in 2019.In addition, high inflation is a harbinger of a hawkish Fed and rising interest rates. Hence, on balance, high inflation is bad news for equities (Chart 5). As inflation climbs, equity returns decline, as multiples contract in anticipation of lower earnings and higher discount rates (Chart 6). Chart 5Equities Underperform In A High-Inflation Environment  Chart 6High Inflation Leads To Multiple Contraction Investing In Periods Of High-Inflation And Rising RatesHigh inflation is often accompanied by rising rates both because of strong economic growth and imminent monetary tightening which aims to arrest growth to combat inflation. As a result, high inflation comes hand in hand with elevated risk aversion and the repricing of more economically sensitive areas of the market.Indeed, when inflation is high (>3.5%) and rates are rising, median three-month equity returns are outright negative, and positive three-months returns occur less than 50% of the time (Chart 7). To beat the market, we need to tilt the return distribution in our favor.Chart 7We Are In High Inflation / Rising Rates Regime When inflation is elevated (above 3.5%) and Treasury yields are climbing, the most appropriate portfolio stance is a tilt toward all-weather defensive sectors like Consumer Staples and Health Care, which hold their own in an environment of slowing growth, as well as sectors that command significant pricing power (Chart 8). The following is a brief summary of the winners and losers. Chart 8Sector Performance In High Inflation / Rising Rates Regime High Inflation/Rising Rate WinnersEnergy: High oil prices are often one of the culprits behind runaway inflation, with the exception of the mid-1980s episode when Saudi Arabia drowned the world in oil, causing a collapse in oil prices, while inflation was on the rise. The energy sector has significant pricing power as it is upstream of the supply chain and can pass on costs to customers (Chart 9). This sector also benefits from high operating leverage. Outperformance usually peaks when inflation turns.Health Care: Health Care stocks tend to outperform when overall consumer prices advance. The non-cyclical nature of health care services reflects their resilience against economic volatility, irrespective of the direction of pricing pressures (Chart 10).  Over the past few years, health care companies have struggled, mostly because of the pressure exerted on pharma by hospitals, insurers, and the government. However, recently, the sector’s pricing power has turned because of pent-up demand for medical procedures. Chart 9The Energy Sector Wields Significant Pricing Power  Chart 10Pricing Power Of The Health Care Sector Has Picked Up Thanks To Pent-up Demand Consumer Staples: Historically, Consumer Staples have outperformed during periods of high inflation (Chart 11). Just like Health Care, this is a non-cyclical sector, because the demand for necessities is inelastic. While this sector is experiencing challenges because of the rising prices of raw materials, it is able to pass on its costs to customers, who have to allocate an increasing share of their budget to necessities. It has also helped multinationals in the S&P 500 index, as they invest in brand building, which now aids them to differentiate their offerings even when consumers are under duress.Utilities: Utilities is another quintessential defensive sector, with a stable revenue stream, significant pricing power, and profitability controlled by the regulators.    Of course, one might argue that this is a highly leveraged sector which may be hurt by rising borrowing costs.  However, it fares well, as regulators have a target return-on-investment for utilities companies, thus allowing them to raise prices to offset rising costs.  Furthermore, with high inflation, long-term debt is smaller in real terms.  Chart 11Consumer Staples Companies Have Invested In Brand-building High Inflation/Rising Rates LosersConsumer Discretionary companies underperform in an environment of high and rising inflation as inflation reduces consumers’ purchasing power and forces them to shift spending away from discretionary goods and services, and toward necessities. The high negative correlation of the sector with the Consumer Drag Indicator is a case in point (Chart 12). Further, rising interest rates often follow high inflation, and weigh on demand for durable goods that require financing.Financials: High inflation is a headwind for the sector because monetary tightening which follows on the heels of high inflation tends to flatten the yield curve, affecting banks’ Net Income Margins (NIM), or the spread between loans and deposits. Inflation also hurts S&P Financials due to the mismatch between bank assets and liabilities. A typical bank has longer maturity for its assets (loans) than for its liabilities (deposits). Consequently, as inflation rises, this reduces the future net inflow because creditors demand higher interest rates, while the returns earned by the bank on its current loan book are mostly fixed by existing contracts. Chart 12Raging Inflation Cuts Into Consumers' Discretionary Spending Inflation Will Turn Soon (Hopefully), And So Will Sector PerformanceInflation is likely to fade somewhat over the coming quarters, as supply chains normalize, and consumer demand wanes because of saturation and elevated prices. Arithmetic will also help, i.e., the base effect will kick in. Also, aggressive monetary policy is likely to slow economic growth and demand for labor further. With all of that, inflation will trend down but will reach the elusive 2% only years from now.However, when it comes to inflation, it is both the level of inflation and the direction of change that matter. While, overall, high inflation is bad for equities, it is necessary to differentiate between “inflation high and rising” and “inflation high and falling” regimes (Chart 13). As such, it is likely that we are about to shift into the “inflation is above 3.5% but falling” regime, where the median three-month return is 3.0% and returns are positive 69% of the time. We do anticipate a rebound in equities once the tighter monetary regime is priced in, and inflation shows signs of abating.Chart 13When Inflation Turns, Equities Will Rebound With the Fed assuming an active role, we believe that going forward, equity returns will be more of a function of the monetary tightening cycle than of inflation. However, falling inflation readings may slow the pace of monetary tightening, or even put the Fed on hold.According to our analysis of sector performance in the “inflation is above 3.5% and is falling” regime, Energy and Materials will be the first sectors to reverse recent gains. The Consumer Discretionary sector is likely to rebound as pressure on consumer purses eases. Financials will also be among sectors that outperform in this regime, since fading inflation will help with asset/liability management. Consumer Staples and Health Care are likely to keep their outperformance going as inflation will continue to be an issue.Last, while empirical analysis does not show that the Technology sector outperforms when inflation is falling, we believe this will be the case based on the simple assumption that falling inflation will imply a lower discount rate (Chart 14). In this regime, we also anticipate a rotation from Value to Growth, and from Large to Small (Chart 15). Chart 14New Inflation Regime Will Usher In New Winners  Chart 15Changes In Inflation Regimes Brought About Market Rotations Stagflation: Magnifying Glass On The 1970sStagflation, along with a recession, is now on investors’ minds – concern about the Fed making a policy mistake. After all, the Fed is already behind the curve, and it is hard to put the inflation genie back into the bottle. What would happen then?In this case, just as in the 1970s, we will see continued growth slowdown accompanied by raging inflation (Chart 16). Back then, equities pulled back every time inflation was on the rise (Chart 17), with Energy, Materials, and Health Care outperforming.The market rebounded at the first signs of inflation abating, reversing sector performance, and turning losers into winners, i.e., Consumer Discretionary and Real Estate started outperforming (Chart 18).Chart 16In The 1970s’ Stagflation Crushed Equities  Chart 17Energy And Materials Were Biggest Winners In the "Inflation High And Rising" Regime...  Chart 18...But They Gave Back Their Gains In "Inflation High But Falling" Regime Bottom LineWe are in a slowdown stage of the business cycle, and Quality, Defensives, and Growth are expected to outperform. However, high inflation has mixed up all the cards and sent Growth into a tailspin. High inflation is unfavorable, not only for Growth but also for equities in general, even though they are a real asset. However, investors can shift the odds of positive returns in their favor by taking a granular approach to sector selection suitable for different inflation regimes.The market is currently in a “high inflation and rising rates” regime, with Energy and Materials outperforming. However, we are about to transition into the “inflation is high but falling” regime, and today’s winners may turn into losers. Defensives is the only group which holds up across all high inflation regimes, thanks to its earnings resilience even in the face of slowing growth.  Irene TunkelChief Strategist, US Equity Strategyirene.tunkel@bcaresearch.com