Equities

Energy service stocks are so oversold and cheaply valued that contrarians are chomping at the bit to establish long positions. Is it time? In previous research, we have cited a number of common elements at bear market troughs: a cresting in total OECD oil inventories; a peak in global crude oil production; and a rising global oil rig count. These conditions do not yet exist, and OPEC seems unlikely to turn off the taps, lest cede market share that they have worked so hard to protect. However, the downturn in U.S. oil production may be providing a preview of what to expect in the rest of the world, particularly as credit and equity market stress robs producers of the access to capital needed to fund drilling programs. There is still a large amount of drilling slack to mop up before pricing power will improve, but the scope of bear market suggests share prices will turn well in advance of any fundamental improvement. We upgraded to neutral last October, and continue to look for an attractive point to shift to overweight. The ticker symbols for the stocks in this index are: BHI, CAM, DO, ESV, FTI, HAL, HP, NOV, SLB, RIG.

A recent article in Barron's painted a bright picture for bank stocks, but we have a more cautious view. While value is attractive, the earnings picture has darkened. The narrowing yield curve and budding downturn in credit quality will put pressure on credit creation to drive profitability. However, we are skeptical that loan growth will improve much. The latest Fed Senior Loan Officer survey showed that banks continue to tighten standards on both C&I and commercial real estate loans. While they remain willing to make consumer and mortgage loans, demand for a number of these categories is drying up. Against a backdrop of increased credit stress and rising corporate bank bond spreads, loan loss reserves are likely to accelerate, warning that low valuations are likely to persist. We recommend only a market neutral weighting. The ticker symbols for the stocks in this index are: BAC, BBT, C, CFG, CMA, FITB, HBAN, JPM, KEY, MTB, PBCT, PNC, RF, STI, USB, WFC, ZION.

It is highly unusual for equities to enter a bear market without the economy going into recession. Since we see the risk of recession as low, we recommend a neutral allocation between bonds and equities.

The current profit backdrop for the machinery industry is grim, but the relative price ratio has already made a large downward adjustment and short interest is sky high. Importantly, machinery companies are finally addressing the need to reinvigorate productivity as an offset to the competitive drag from a strong exchange rate. Importantly, history underscores the likelihood of at least a temporary hiatus in the bear market. Going back to the 1950s, we have identified five durable machinery relative performance bear markets. On average, they lasted 42 months and recorded 44% in declines from peak to trough. In comparison, the current downturn has been underway since 2011, with the price ratio shedding 36%. Interestingly, a cycle-on-cycle analysis shows that machinery stocks have troughed prior to any turnaround in either the ISM index or the U.S. leading economic indicator. Instead, the group appears to have taken its cue from U.S. dollar weakness and a rally in commodity prices, both of which herald better times ahead for primary machinery end markets. Consequently, continued economic deterioration may not translate into additional relative underperformance. We upgraded to neutral in yesterday's Weekly Report, protecting a profit of 19%. The ticker symbols for the stocks in this index are: CAT, ITW, DE, PCAR, CMI, SWK, IR, PH, SNA, DOV, PNR, XYL, FLS.

Equities are attempting to find support. This year's savage downward adjustment has created short-term oversold conditions and pushed sentiment gauges to depressed levels. These circumstances can often presage violent countertrend rallies. Sentiment can be a reliable contrary indicator, but is often misleading as a standalone. BCA's Composite Sentiment Index is depressed within the context of the past few years, but it is not yet at the extremes seen at previous bear market lows and/or during recessions. Moreover, sentiment can stay low when selling begets selling as corporate profits shrink. On this front, current leading indicators are signaling ongoing vulnerability: Global trade is in recession, deflation still haunts the corporate sector courtesy of the strong U.S. dollar and the latest durable goods report was very weak. Consequently, the recent equity bounce should be treated with caution and as a cash-raising opportunity.

The oversold bounce is not supported by policy or profits, and should be treated as countertrend. Lift machinery to neutral and differentiate between pharmaceuticals and the unwinding of the biotech mania.

Any recovery in risk assets and selloff in safe havens is unlikely to extend into the cyclical horizon.

Last month, the model outperformed both global and U.S. equities in local-currency and U.S.-dollar terms. For February, the model is aggressively increasing its risk exposure and has included a bet on commodities for the first time since 2012. For equities, the largest overweight remains Europe, but EM and Canada enjoyed significant upgrades. For bonds, the model favors the European periphery.

Special Report

While cyclical factors have contributed to the recent trade slowdown, there are many longer-term structural forces that will pose headwinds to globalization. A lack of aggregate demand will constrain growth and hurt trade in a global economy attempting to increase savings. Meanwhile, the bulk of economic dividends from free trade have already been reaped. The direct casualties from slowing global trade are economies with large export sectors: most commodity-producing countries and some south-east Asian nations.

The previous Insight showed that the overall industrials sector was in recession territory, based on the message from sinking capital goods orders. At a minimum, that argues for a highly selective investment approach. For instance, in December, we separated our coverage of the S&P aerospace & defense index into its two distinct components, underweight the former and overweighting the latter. We showed that a divergence between these two groups is typical during recessions. The latest data bear out this view. Aerospace new orders are very soft, arguing the commercial aerospace cycle is on the downswing. In turn, that implies lower plane deliveries and future profit margin pressure, as evidenced by Boeings' earnings miss. Conversely, defense orders are moving higher, which is supportive of ongoing earnings growth. We reiterate our overweight view of defense stocks, and underweight stance on aerospace names.