Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.
Skip to main content
Skip to main content

Japan

The ultimate driver of bank profitability is loan growth. A brighter economic backdrop in the U.S. compared with both the euro area and Japan paints a rosier picture for relative credit growth opportunities (third panel). Already, bank credit growth in the U.S. is outpacing Japan and the euro area (top panel). This divergence has staying power, given that the U.S. economic expansion is becoming self-reinforcing, while the export-dependent euro area and Japan remain fragile. While loan volume generation is a key profit center for banks, loan pricing is equally important. On this front, negative interest rate policy (NIRP) in both the euro area and Japan are worrisome. NIRP puts an interest rate floor on deposit taking institutions that are reluctant to pass negative deposit rates onto their customers. Concurrently, NIRP forces banks to lend out new money, or roll over existing loans, at declining interest rates. This is especially constraining in the euro area periphery where mortgage lending is financed at the very short-end of the curve. The end result is a net interest margin squeeze (bottom panel). Meanwhile, each country is in a different phase of its credit cycle. U.S. and Japanese NPLs are probing multi-year lows, whereas euro area NPLs are very elevated (second panel). Tight labor markets in both the U.S. and Japan argue for a continuation of the downtrend in NPLs, although the rise in corporate bond spreads suggests that business loans are more at risk. The euro area's double-digit unemployment rate warns that NPLs will sap European bank profitability for a while longer. Bottom Line: U.S. financials are the best of a bad lot, while euro area and Japanese financials will continue to struggle to keep pace with broad market returns. For additional information on global financials please refer to the March 18 Global Alpha Sector Strategy report titled "Happy Days?". (Part III) What To Do With Global Financials? (Part III) What To Do With Global Financials?
Bank stocks comprise the bulk of financials indexes' market cap weights in the G3 (U.S., Euro Area and Japan). Thus, bank profit growth should largely define each region's financials sector earnings path, and by extension, relative performance. The top panel of the chart shows that the euro area and Japan have massive banking sectors as a percentage of GDP, especially compared with the U.S. Bank deleveraging is ongoing in the euro area, as banks continue to retrench from emerging markets and because of domestic economic slack. Sustained asset shedding in Europe is inherently negative for bank profitability, at least in the near-term, as bankers simultaneously become more conservative and reluctant to extend credit. Moreover, bank leverage ratios are stretched in Japan and in the euro area versus the U.S. (second panel). In other words, the equity capital cushion remains insufficient in the euro area and in Japan to absorb a local or global credit shock. U.S. banks are well capitalized following the Great Recession TARP recapitalization, but euro area banks continue to be plagued by ongoing and extremely dilutive equity capital raisings. Worrisomely, despite sporting higher leverage ratios, both Japanese and euro area financials ROEs trail the U.S. by a wide and rising margin (bottom panel). Steeply diverging regional ROEs should continue to drive a relative rerating of U.S. financials versus both euro area and Japanese financials (see the bottom panel of the previous Insight). Meanwhile, diverging credit and economic growth profiles, NIMs and NPLs, all favor U.S. versus both European and Japanese financials (please see the next Insight). (Part II) What To Do With Global Financials? (Part II) What To Do With Global Financials?
While relative financials stock returns tend to be highly correlated across regions, especially in the developed world (top panel), extremely divergent monetary policy developments and operating metrics suggest that these long-standing tight correlations are destined to loosen. Thus, Global Alpha Sector Strategy has broken down global financials sector coverage into three geographies: U.S., Europe and Japan, following in the footsteps of our recent disentangling of global consumer discretionary coverage (see the March 17 Insights). In that light, the euro area and Japanese financials sectors are at a particularly acute disadvantage relative to the U.S., given diverging leverage, capital cushions and ROEs (please see the next Insight). (Part I) What To Do With Global Financials? (Part I) What To Do With Global Financials?

We continue to recommend a cautious investment stance, staying at benchmark duration, as the recovery in risk assets looks more like a counter-trend rally than the start of a new bullish run.

We are sending you the Q2 <i>Global Investment Strategy Outlook</i>, which discusses the ten predictions we expect to drive global financial markets throughout the rest of the year.

Fed dovishness is weakening the U.S. dollar. As the ECB and BoJ move to the sidelines and the Fed remains reluctant to hike rates, the euro and Japanese yen should continue to recover versus the greenback.

Several tail risks appear less ominous compared to last month. Nonetheless, the earnings outlook has not improved and the FOMC will turn more hawkish ahead of the June meeting. Stay defensively positioned.

Several tail risks appear less ominous compared to last month. Nonetheless, the earnings outlook has not improved and the FOMC will turn more hawkish ahead of the June meeting. Stay defensively positioned.

Risk assets are stuck in a range driven by the Fed feedback loop. But the current rally may continue for another quarter or two.

There is little evidence suggesting that declining productivity growth in recent years has resulted from measurement error. Businesses have plucked many of the low-hanging fruits made possible by the IT revolution, while cyclical factors stemming from the Great Recession have also weighed on productivity. Low productivity growth tends to be deflationary in the short run, but inflationary longer-term. For now, this is good news for bonds, but is likely to become bad news by decade-end.